Friday, October 14, 2016

"The Dressmaker" and The Week in Reviews

[I review the movie "The Dressmaker" as well as two documentaries available on DVD: "City of Gold" and "To Be Takei."  The Book of the Week is "Playing Dead: A Journey Through the World of Death Fraud."  I also bring you up-to-date on "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project" with an early martial arts film: "A Touch of Zen."]




The Dressmaker


Myrtle "Tilly" Dunnage returns to her small rural Australian Outback town to seek revenge.

A long shot from above shows a train puffing over the Australian Outback and when it stops, out steps a fashionably dressed woman who says "I'm back, you bastards."  Meet Myrtle Dunnage (Kate Winslet) AKA as Tilly.

Tilly was sent away from her hometown of Dungatar after a disastrous incident that happened when she was a child.  She traveled the world and became a dressmaker, working at some of the great ateliers in Paris.  Now it is 1951 and she is back and it's the talk of the town.  She has come back to take care of her ailing mother, Molly (Judy Davis) -- but she has also come back for revenge.

She steps off the train dressed to the nines in a Dior-inspired dress of her own creation and is greeted by the local cop, Horatio Farrat (Hugo Weaving) who swoons over her dress. We discover that our local cop appreciates and likes to wear women's clothes, especially feather boas.  When Tilly arrives at her old house, she finds it in disrepair and her mother in bed with a possum to keep her company. Tilly's mother is eccentric to say the least and verging on dementia. Her strange lifestyle and the townspeople have dubbed her "Mad Molly" due to her strange antics. 

Tilly's mother doesn't recognize her (or pretends not to) and Tilly, not remembering what happened in 1926 when she left, asks her mother if she, Tilly, is a murderer. Tilly believes that she is cursed. Her mother says she doesn't remember any of it, either. After that question, the story unfolds that as a young girl, Tilly witnessed the death of a young boy, Stewart Pettyman, and, because she was there when he died, his parents blamed her for his death and had her sent her away. 

Tilly's starts a dressmaking business out of her mother's home and soon wins over the local women when she transforms the drab and bespectacled Gertrude (Sarah Snook) into a princess.  After her transformation, Gertrude charms the rich and handsome William (James Mackay) much to his social climbing mother's dismay. You see, Gertrude is the daughter of the local shopkeeper. Not suitable! Tilly's success with Gertrude leads the other local women to seek Tilly's services. The local women are all transformed by Tilly's dresses and there is a cute scene when we encounter them all dressed to the nines walking around the dusty town in the middle of the day. Tilly's success with her dressmaking business causes Mr. Pettyman (Shane Bourne), who is the local councilman and who still has it out for Tilly, to bring in a rival dressmaker, Una Pleasance (Sacha Horler), in a side-story that was an unnecessary distraction.

Tilly is out to shock the townsfolk and early upon her arrival in town, sashays to a rugby match where she does a modified strip tease causing the opposing team to be distracted and lose the game.  That is a good thing for local handsome boy Teddy (Liam Hemsworth) and he and Tilly start a relationship.

Tilly is not just out to shock the townsfolk, though.  She is also out for revenge for their blaming her for Stewart's death and sending her away.  However, in the course of her seeking revenge, she finds out just what happened that day with Stewart, why and how she was sent away, and her mother's big secret.  And, oh, yeah, she gets her revenge too.

Speaking of the pairing of Winslet and Hemsworth, considering that Kate Winslet is 41 and Hemsworth is 26, it's a strange pairing, but little is made of the obvious age difference especially since there is the implication that the two had known each othe when Tilly was still living in the town.  However, Winslet is a lovely woman that any 26 year old man would probably have a hard time saying no to. Likewise, those Hemsworth boys are lovely to behold.  Chris has always been a favorite of mine, but I also enjoyed Liam here, especially when he took his shirt off so that Tilly could measure him for a suit which was a fun scene with Molly lurking about and lusting after him.  Supposedly Hemsworth worked out and did some extreme dieting for that scene and Winslet remarked in a magazine article that she could hear his stomach growling during their scenes. But I didn't mind the age difference.  I certainly wouldn't kick him out of bed! 

Judy Davis as Molly is also wonderful (when is she not wonderful? She's had me ever since "My Brilliant Career"), though I found her character here annoying at first.  But as Molly warms to Tilly, the two play well against each other.

This is a strange little film.  Based on the novel by Rosalie Harn (screenplay by director Jocelyn Moorhouse and P.J. Hogan), it can't seem to decide whether it's a drama or a comedy.  It vacillates between the two.  There are certainly some very dramatic and serious, tragic even, elements to this film, but then Tilly's mother is a comic character until the end and the townspeople are a motley crew, to say the least.  The pharmacist has a hunchback that is so bad that when he gets going he can't stop his forward motion, so his wife sits outside the pharmacy with a pillow on her lap so he can stop himself by ramming his head into the pillow.  The side story of the other dressmaker coming to town to give Tilly some competition is a comical but distracting element, and William's mother trying to keep Gertrude and William apart has some slapstick humor.  In fact, all of the townspeople are comic characters which is at times jarring against the more tragic elements of the film.

Director Jocelyn Moorhouse made her mark in the 90's with "Proof (1991)," "How to Make an American Quilt (1995)," and "A Thousand Acres (1997)," so this is her first film in almost 20 years and it's a nice vehicle for Winslet who I find to be a lovely and talented screen presence, not to mention my enjoyment of the hunky Liam. But it's also welcome to see a film directed by a woman and driven by a strong female character. Moorhouse knows how to make films that showcase women. The film's location in the Australian Outback is also very atmospheric, thanks to the cinematophy by Donald McAlpine.  He captures the stark beauty of the Outback, which is a particular favorite film location of mine.

Rosy the Reviewer says...it's a fun, though strange, little story but Winslet's, Davis's and Weaving's performances are worth the price of a ticket. And if you want to see it, better get to the theatre soon.  There was little hype for this film and it won't be around long, but it deserves to be seen.



 
***Some Movies You Might Have Missed888
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)!

Now on DVD





City of Gold (2015)


A profile of Los Angeles Times food critic Jonathan Gold.

Food writer Johnathan Gold gets into his green pick-up truck and tours Los Angeles ("The City of Gold") to explore the food that defines it.  He is not your typical snobby foodie who extolls the virtues of a five-hour, 12-course French meal at prices that would defy most of us to partake. No, Gold's thing is finding those Mom and Pop storefront restaurants that just happen to have some of the best food in town.  He writes as a cultural commentator using food to comment on modern life. It's food criticism as storytelling and Gold is so good at it that he was the first food critic to get a Pulitzer.

But Gold wasn't always a food critic.  He was a failed cello player who discovered punk rock music.  Punk rock took him out of his shell and he played cello with some weird bands.  He also grew up in LA and you can feel the love he has for his city.

"I am an LA guy.  I drive.  I am my truck - my truck is me."

How very L.A.

Gold came to fame when he wrote a piece for The L.A. Weekly called "The Year I Ate Pico Boulevard," where he ate at every restaurant along Pico Boulevard (15.5 miles) and then wrote about it. 


If you consider yourself a foodie, you need to know who Jonathan Gold is.

Food and writing have been paired throughout history and that has turned food from fuel to an art form.  The French started it (of course) but now we have Yelp where everyone is a food critic. The film explores the role of the food critic and why we need him or her.  We may have Yelp but, take note, Yelpers and those who read your reviews, actual food critics have actual knowledge.

As Gold explores LA restaurants, he doesn't just appreciate the food, he appreciates where the food has come from - the culture of the food.  He says you don't have to travel far in L.A. to feel you have traveled far. He changed the food writing world when he started to write about the hard-to-find restaurants in small communities like out in the Valley.  Gasp!  The Valley? Who goes THERE?  He highlight's LA's self-contained cities of people who are not cooking for tourists, they are cooking for their communities.

"In this ordinary place, there happens to be extraordinary food."

That leads us to a bit of L.A. history where the sprawl happened because everyone wanted a yard.  Gold provides a culinary map that helps us understand the city.  He not only eats at the restaurants, he profiles the owners and their lives. According to this film, the biggest thing in restaurants over the last 40 years is diversity.  In the old days everything considered good was French and now it's all over the place. This is the story of immigrants passing down their family recipes here in the United States and Gold says we are luckier for it. 

Gold also bucked the tradition of being an anonymous food critic.  He felt that everyone figured out who the critics were eventually anyway, so why bother?  He reserves under fake names but doesn't bother to disguise himself.  He goes to a restaurant four or five times before he writes his reviews.  If the cuisine is unfamiliar, he might go as many as 17 times.  What a job!

Written and directed by Laura Gabbert, this film shows the real L.A. through the eyes of GoldEveryone thinks they know what L.A. is even if they have never been there.  Gold does know L.A.  It's his town.

So where should we eat when in LA?

Favorites highlighted are the Mariscos Jalisco food truck, Thai restaurant Jitlada, Nanjing Kitchen, Little Ethiopia, Tom's #5 Chiliburgers (and chili fries), Soban, rice bowls at Chego, Korean street food at Kogi, King Taco ("taco eating. The word taco should be a verb!"), Chengdu, and Attari Sandwich Shop to name a few.

Rosy the Reviewer says...a film about food and a food critic but it's also a love letter to Los Angeles, the city Jonathan Gold loves - The City of Gold.  Brilliant!






To Be Takei (2014)


Who knew Lt. Sulu would become an Internet phenomenon with over seven million Facebook fans at the age of 77?

In 1966 when the TV show "Star Trek" first aired, there were few African American or Asian stars on TV.  "Star Trek" changed all of that with Uhura and Sulu.

Today, at 77, actor George Takei (pronounced Ta-Kay - I bet you have been pronouncing it wrong, right?) is more famous than he ever was when starring on "Star Trek."  Who doesn't love George Takei with those memes and quotes that are all over the Internet?

This film chronicles Takei's life from his youth growing up in Los Angeles, followed by his family being sent to a Japanese interment camp in Arkansas during WW II, and his subsequent struggles to make his way as an Asian actor in a world where his first roles were uncredited voiceovers in "Godzilla Raids Again" and "Rodan" and the later roles available to him were usually stereotypical ones such as Japanese houseboys or evil Vietnamese soldiers. 

After the "Star Trek" TV show, roles dried up so Takei ran for L.A City Council and lost but then Mayor Bradley appointed him to the Southern California Rapid Transit District where he served for 11 years. But then along came the "Star Trek" movies, projects on Broadway and campaigning for marriage equality.  Like many gay people in the movie industry, he had to hide his homosexuality, but decided that he had to come out in order to stand up for gay rights.

We hear from his co-stars in "Star Trek," and others who George has known and influenced along the way. Today George is known for his social media memes, sayings on Facebook and for just being George Takei, beloved by old "Star Trek" fans and the younger generation alike.

The film also follows George and his husband, Brad, as they drive around Los Angeles.  George is the laid back one and Brad is the "nervous" one who handles George's business affairs.  As they drive and walk around, they  humorously bicker, George also talks about himself and we get to hear from George directly in that VOICE.  If ever a voice could be called mellifluous, George Takei has that voice.

Rosy the Reviewer says...who wouldn't want to spend 90 minutes with George Takei?  I could listen to that voice for hours.







***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***




231 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?





A Touch of Zen (1971)



After her family is murdered, Yang is on the run from government officials, but is helped by Ku, a scholar/artist and some Buddhist monks.

Yang (Hsu Feng) was the daughter of a government official who, when he uncovered a plot by the evil eunuch, Wei, to overthrow the emperor, was murdered along with her entire family. Yang escaped but now she is on the run.  Hsu's henchmen are looking for her.

The film begins in a small village during the Ming Dynasty. Ku (Chun Shih) is a scholar and painter who is also a bit clumsy, clueless and unambitious.  His mother wants him to be a government official and scolds him for his lack of ambition. She also laments the fact that he is unmarried and that she will never have any grandchildren to carry on the family name.

Ku is approached by a stranger to paint his portrait but we discover that the stranger is a bad guy looking for Yang.  I couldn't help but notice that the stranger also has an uncanny resemblance to Donald Trump despite the Ming official headwear.  

When Ku finally meets Yang (and it takes 35 minutes before they even meet), who is living alone in an abandoned General's mansion, his mother starts to do a bit of matchmaking.  Ku is obviously attracted to Ms. Yang and when she lures him to her place they have sex.  After that encounter, Ku finds out that Yang is a fugitive on the run and somehow that sexual encounter has changed Ku from an awkward Ku into the brave Ku who wants to help Ms. Yang.  But when he goes to tell her he wants to help, he meets a so-called blind man who isn't really blind.  He is General Shih who is in disguise and working with Yang. The bad guys attack them, Shih kills them in the usual highly choreographed martial arts way, so now Ku knows that Shih is not blind.  Ku also knows that he is really truly screwed because now he is involved in all of this stuff.  Still with me? 

But Ku finally gets to do something.  He concocts a plan to spread a rumor that the General's Mansion is haunted and they booby trap the place to make the bad guys think they are being haunted by the undead.  Lots of fights ensue and the bad guys are killed but then Ku can't find Yang.  He tracks her down at a monastery where she has decided to become a nun.  And surprise, surprise.  She has a baby.  It's Ku's baby.  She lured him into having sex so she could give him an heir, something his mother wanted.  Now that is going above and beyond to help out an unhappy mother! When more bad guys show up at the monastery there is a huge battle with the monks that all ends in a very stylized, very "zen" way.

Why it's a Must See:  "There's a reason [why this film] is considered a benchmark in Chinese cinema: It's like a Rosetta Stone of the wuxia, or swords-and-sorcery, genre...[Director] King Hu is rightly regarded as the pioneering director of the wuxia film, in spite of the genre's existence in film history...it was Hu who brought these traits to the cinema, combining them with the acrobatics and pageantry of Peking Opera and the underpinnings of Zen Buddhism."

The film is very stylized and arty with beautiful cinematography, but it's one of those films that likes itself so much that it lingers too long on every shot just in case we might miss how gorgeous it is.  Every shot takes FOREVER which I guess is why the film is three hours long and everything takes a long time to happen.

But it is an early martial arts film and what is really great about these Chinese martial arts films is the strong women warriors who can kick the bad guys' butts and Yang is no exception. The literal English translation of the movie's Chinese title is "Warrior Woman."  And another interesting facet of this movie is no CGI.  This was all down to the actors to be super acrobatic and athletic.

Rosy the Reviewer says...a gorgeously produced film with an interesting story.  I just wish it hadn't taken so long to get to the point.







***Book of the Week***




Playing Dead: A Journey Through the World of Death Fraud by Elizabeth Greenwood (2016)


Ever want to fake your own death?  Well, meet those who have and get some tips in case you decide to do it too!

Greenwood was awash in student debt so was tempted to try to fake her own death.  "Is it possible to do that in the 21st century?" she wondered.  She goes off to find out.

She profiles some famous "fakers," such as "The Canoe Man," a guy who went kayaking (they call it a canoe in the UK) and was presumed dead for eight years only to discover he had been living with his wife in his own house the whole time.  He ended up turning himself in.  Greenwood also profiles others who faked their own deaths, but who made some mistakes that led to their being found out.

And then there are the people who Greenwood calls "The Believers," those who believe that Michael Jackson and Elvis are still alive and faked their own deaths.  Why do they believe that?  She investigates.

She then decides to find out if she could fake her own death and travels to Manila to get a fake death certificate.  She got the fake death certificate, but that's as far as it went.  But she also discovered there was a certain satisfaction to know she could disappear at any time if she wanted to.

"The impulse and instinct to begin again is as deeply imprinted on our psyches as it is to begin in the first place...What it comes down to is choices: how the assemblage of tiny decisions we make all day can, before you know it, accumulate into a mountain so high that jumping off with a hidden parachute appears to be the only way out...What have I learned from all this?  I've learned that faking your death is less romantic than I thought it would be.  The people I met traded in the dark and the bizarre, but they all still waded through the quotidian business of living...I've learned it is still possible to fake your own death in the twenty-first century, and, in some ways, it's easier now than ever..."

It's good to know that Greenwood's life improved and she stopped thinking about faking her own death, but here are some things she learned in case you need to disappear.

Some tips from those "fakers" who learned the hard way:

  • If you fake your death, don't come back.  Not for your wife.  Not for your girlfriend.  Not for your kids. 
  • If you plan to claim life insurance, be sure the policy is small (otherwise causes undo suspicion)
  • Don't fake your own death at sea.  Go for a hike
  • Don't bother with a stand-in body and elaborate funeral.  Spend your money on good authenticating documents.
  • Commit to a disguise
  • Use your real first name (then you won't have to worry about remembering who you are)
  • Don't Google yourself (you can be traced)
  • Don't drive (a simple ticket for a broken tail light can lead to your capture)

Rosy the Reviewer says...a fascinating look into a world few of us know about.


 
That's it for this week!
 

Thanks for reading!


See you next Friday 

 
for my review of

"The Girl on the Train"

 and 

  The Week in Reviews

(What to See or Read and What to Avoid)


 and the latest on



"My 1001 Movies I Must See Before  

 I Die Project." 

 

 
If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rosythereviewer


Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.

 

Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 

Go to IMDB.com, find the movie you are interested in.  Once there, click on the link that says "Explore More" on the right side of the screen.  Scroll down to External Reviews and when you get to that page, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.

NOTE:  On some entries, this has changed.  If you don't see "Explore More" on the right side of the screen, scroll down just below the description of the film in the middle of the page. Click where it says "Critics." Look for "Rosy the Reviewer" on the list.

Or if you are using a mobile device, look for "Critics Reviews." Click on that and you will find me alphabetically under "Rosy the Reviewer."

Friday, October 7, 2016

"The Magnificent Seven" and The Week in Reviews

[I review the new movie "The Magnificent Seven" as well as DVDs "Genius" and "10 Cloverfield Lane."  The Book of the Week is "The Girl on the Train."  I also bring you up-to-date with "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project" with "The Phenix City Story."]




The Magnificent Seven


Bartholomew Bogue and his henchman have taken over the small mining town of Rose Creek, robbing it of its resources and enslaving the locals, killing anyone who questions his authority.  A plucky woman whose husband was killed by the bad guys travels to another town to get help and manages to find seven gunman to help her reclaim her town.

Chris Chisholm (Denzel Washington) is a warrant officer (which I think is a fancy name for a bounty hunter) out looking for criminals when he comes across Emma Cullen (Haley Bennett).  In the cold opening of the film we have already seen her husband get killed by the evil Bartholomew Bogue (Peter Sarsgaard) and his henchmen who have taken over the town.  Emma is looking for help to get her town back and she engages Chris who in turn finds six other men to help her. All having their reasons for getting involved, they return to the town and prepare the townspeople and themselves to take on Bogue and his men.  It looks like an impossible task but you know how these kinds of movies go, right?

This is a remake of a remake.  The first remake was the 1960 film of the same name which turned Kurasawa's original Samurai warrior film "The Seven Samurai" into a western.  If you read my reviews regularly you know how I feel about remakes, so I won't get into that whole thing again.  Let's just say I don't like remakes and since this is not only a remake, but a remake of a remake, you would think that I really wouldn't like it.  But you would be wrong. 

Though there are similarities between the 2016 version and the 1960 version of this film, most notably that they are both westerns with all-star casts, the actual plot is a bit different. Both the original film and the 1960 remake involved bandits robbing and pillaging the town whenever they felt the need.  In this latest version, there is a resident pillager, Bogue, who is terrorizing and exploiting the townfolk and the local farmers. The 1960 film had a romance, this one doesn't, and there certainly were no African Americans or Native Americans as part of the "Seven" in the 1960 remake.  However, the pyrrhic victory remains the same.

As in most westerns/war movies/etc. that involve a group of guys, there is always a mix of personalities and everyone comes with some baggage.  In that way, the two films remain the same with some slight variations on the characters, though despite Chris Pratt and Denzel, for its day, the 1960 film had more big names.

If you were a fan of the 1960 version, you will remember that badass Yul Brynner played the head gunslinger Chris Adams.  Now badass Denzel Washington leads the "Seven" as warrant officer Sam Chisholm; Steve McQueen's failed gambler Vin Tanner is replaced by character Chris Pratt's Josh Faraday, though Josh also likes to do card tricks and blow things up; Bernardo O'Reilly (Charles Bronson), a gunfighter of Irish-Mexican heritage in the original remake, is comparable to the new film's Mexican outlaw Vasquez (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo) and Britt (James Coburn), the knife expert is now an Asian character, Billy Rocks (Byung-hun Lee).  And every group has to have a coward - Ethan Hawke plays Goodnight Robicheaux who is having a crisis of confidence just as Lee (Robert Vaughn) did in the 1960 version. A couple of new characters are an almost unrecognizable Vincent D'Onofrio as the mountain man Jack Horne and Martin Sensmeier as the Native American warrior Red Harvest. This latest remake had no comparable character for the hotheaded, inexperienced but very hot and handsome Chico (Horst Buchholz), who provided a love interest in the 1960 film.  No romance in this new one.

So the characters are similar and so is the plot.  So why redo this already classic redo?

I would guess part of the reason could be the dearth of westerns these days, and it's a classic story of good versus evil and fighting for what's right even if the odds are against you.  Plus the studios were probably looking for something that would highlight Chris Pratt who is really hot right now.

I am not much of a western fan.  I think it's because there were just so many of them on TV when I was growing up.  I was more of a sitcom girl (remember "Bachelor Father" and "Ozzie and Harriet?").  My Dad was a western fan so I got my fill of "Gunsmoke" and "Have Gun Will Travel" and "Wanted Dead or Alive."  TV was awash in westerns in the 1950's and 60's.


But I have to say this is an exciting, well-acted story and I enjoyed it.

Haley Bennett plays our plucky heroine, and though I liked that she got right in there with the men fighting off the bad guys, I couldn't get over the fact that every costume she wore had some decolletage or was off the shoulder or showed some cleavage. Not very practical outfits for clomping around in the dirt, riding a horse or shooting a rifle. We didn't have any romance in this film, but we certainly had some cheesecake.

Chris Pratt has pretty much perfected the smirking smart ass character and here he is again.  Denzel is his usual wonderful steady steely badass self and Ethan Hawke is poignant as the troubled ex-Confederate officer Robicheaux. Peter Saarsgard is expert at playing reptilian types and and this part is no exception.

The cinematography is beautiful and, at the end of the film, you are even treated to a little of the iconic instantly recognizable "Magnificent Seven" theme music by Elmer Bernstein made famous in the 1960 film.

Here is a little treat for you while you read the rest of my reviews!
You are very welcome!



Directed by Antoine Fuqua, who has worked with Denzel on "Training Day" and "The Equalizer," with a script by Richard Wenk and Nic Pizzolatto, this film is beautiful to look at and is a welcome addition to the western movie genre in a world where we see few westerns anymore.

Rosy the Reviewer says...if you like westerns and shoot 'em ups, you will enjoy this. 





***Some Movies You Might Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)!

Now on DVD






Genius (2016)


A biopic of reknowned book editor Maxwell Perkins who guided the work of Thomas Wolfe, F.Scott Fitzgerald and Hemingway while working at Scribners in the 1920's.

You might say, Maxwell who?  Literary films are few and far between these days and when they do occur they often don't do well at the box office.  Not sure what that says about us and our penchant for reading, or lack thereof (see how literary I am using big words)?  So it's strange to see this little film about a man few know today played by one of our most well-known actors, Colin Firth

Though Perkins worked with Fitzgerald and Hemingway and other writers, this film focuses on his relationship with Thomas Wolfe (Jude Law) from the publication of Wolfe's first novel "Look Homeward Angel" to "Time and the River." Wolfe is portrayed as a bit of a nut job and has a relationship with Aline Bernstein (Nicole Kidman), who is also kind of a nut job.  She is not particularly happy about Thomas's success since it cuts into her time with him. You see, she is older and bit insecure about that.

But it's the relationship between Perkins and Wolfe that is the interesting one.  They both influenced the other. Tom's freewheeling lifestyle loosened Max up, and Max was able to calm Tom's writing style down.  You see, Tom has absolutely no problem whipping out a 5000 page manuscript and doesn't want to cut a word of it. Tom is single-minded about his work and it dawns on Max that he too is the same.  Even though there are wives and lovers, this film is about the relationship between Max and Tom and explores the psyches of these two men.  Where Tom's ego was big enough that he thought every word of a 5000 page book was worth keeping, Max was wracked with doubt that his editing made the book better. The movie also explores the question: since Wolfe couldn't edit himself how much of his success was because of Perkins?

Perkins was never a writer himself but he understood writers and what made a good book.  Working with Wolfe was a challenge because Wolfe was so prolific and, er, wordy?  He could knock off a 5000 page book - no problem.  Perkins had to make it readable.  Wolfe was in love with his own words and Perkins was able to get him to hone the book down into a readable one. So who was the genius here?  Wolfe or Perkins?

Perkins lived a seemingly normal life at home in Connecticut with his wife, played by Laura Linney (what has happened to her career?  She seems to play nothing but wives of famous men these days e.g. "Sully") and their five daughters, but when he would go to work in NYC he would be surrounded by literary geniuses, mostly men. 

Perkins was a father figure for Wolfe and his other authors.  There are appearances by Fitzgerald (Guy Pearce), who has to deal with his wife Zelda and his career on the downswing and Hemingway (Dominic West) whose confidence is in contrast to Fitzgerald's lack of it. Perkins was as much father confessor as editor. He was a bit of a father figure to his authors and, with five daughters, they in turn were his "sons."

Jude Law, who was once a great heartthrob and who we don't see that much anymore, does a good job showing Wolfe as a character who was complicated and "so full of life" that after he died (he died young at the age of 38) "there was a great void."  But I found the character annoying. If that was how Wolfe really was, I don't know how Perkins put up with him.  People who are "full of life" can also be a pain in the butt. Nicole Kidman as Aline is also annoying but she is supposed to be and does a very good job of being annoying.

But it's Firth, with Perkins' ever present fedora, who carries the film.  His quiet elegance and patience comes through and he is able to convey Perkins' love for Wolfe, who was probably the son he never had and why he put up with him.

Directed by Michael Grandage with a screenplay by John Logan (based on the book "Max Perkins, Editor of Genius" by A. Scott Berg), one can't help but wonder how this little film ever got made and with such big names.  It was probably in the theatres for about a minute.  But we need these kinds of films and we need to remember the great authors.

Rosy the Reviewer says...an interesting exploration of a time of great literary expression and the man who made it all happen. Now go read a book!





10 Cloverfield Lane (2016)


A woman escaping her past gets into a car accident and when she wakes up finds herself in a bunker with two men who say there has been an apocalyptic chemical attack.

Mary Elizabeth Winstead plays Michelle, who has left her boyfriend, Ben, and is fleeing in the dead of night.  Few people are around and out of nowhere she is struck by a truck.  When she wakes up she finds herself chained to a bed in a room with an IV in her arm.  She sees her cell phone a few feet away, so she rips out her IV and gets to her phone and wouldn't you know?  The bane of cell phone users existence!  NO SERVICE.

But she isn't going to lie around waiting to find out why she is a captive.  She decides to be proactive. She fashions a knife out of her crutch and then starts a fire in the air vent.  When her seeming captor finally comes into the room she attacks him but he overcomes her and sedates her once again.  When she comes to again, we finally find out that her captor is Howard (John Goodman) and he has saved her from "the attack." He's not sure if it was chemical or nuclear. She soon learns that she is not alone in the bunker with Howard.  There is another person there as well, Emmett (John Gallagher Jr.), a young guy we don't know much about. He eventually shares with Michelle that he's not a smart guy and gave up his sports scholarship to go to college because he feared the smarter kids.  We also learn that Howard is a survivalist and conspiracy theorist.

Howard, Michelle and Emmett are all together in an uneasy alliance.  Howard states the rules:  use coasters on the table because it's an heirloom, put the DVDs and tapes back in their sleeves and no touching. The three settle into a routine of playing games, watching videos.

But little things start happening that make Michelle feel like Howard is not telling the truth about the attack. Michelle starts to remember the accident and suspects that Howard was the one who hit her.  What if he did it on purpose?

One day the air filtration system fails so Howard has Michelle crawl into the duct system to restart it.  While in the space where the filtration system is, she sees a ladder leading up to a skylight.  She can't resist crawling up there and when she gets to the top, she sees the word "Help" scrawled into the glass.  She also finds an earring and a picture of a girl that Emmett recognizes as a girl from his high school who went missing.

Michelle starts working on Emmett to form an alliance against Howard so they can escape and one hour and fifteen minutes into the film there is a big twist.

So the whole crux of this film is this:  is Howard telling the truth - has there been an apocalypse - or is he a perv who has abducted her? 

This is a three-hander, meaning for almost all of the film it's just the three characters, but the film also seems to want to make a metaphor out of Michelle's distrust of Howard and her need to escape from the confines of the bunker, no matter what. Michelle has always run away. Michelle shares with Emmett that she had an abusive childhood and there was an incident where she could have helped a little girl who was also being abused.  But she didn't and she ran away. She has just run away from her boyfriend and is now also trying to run away. Mmmm.

John Goodman started out as the jovial kindly father on "Rosanne" and has matured into character roles, some sidekicks and supporting roles, but lately, more and more sinister types.  I haven't decided if Goodman is a good dramatic actor or not. I will keep you posted.  But Winstead and Gallagher are wonderful young actors.  Winstead has starred in the TV shows "Mercy Street" and "BrainDead" and will be starring in the third season of "Fargo," premiering in 2017.  I think we will also see more of her in feature films. Gallagher also hails from TV shows - "The Newsroom" and the award-winning "Olive Kitteridge" mini-series.

Directed by Dan Trachtenberg, produced by J.J. Abrams of "Star Wars" fame (he also produced the first "Cloverfield") and with a script by Josh Campbell, Matthew Steucken and Damien Chazelle, this film does not have much in common with the first one, except the name, though there was a bit of a tease at the end.  Was it related to the first film?  Not sure.  But this one is not directly related (I don't think), which was a sort of disappointment because I found the first film to be a fresh, original and creepy horror film. However, there are rumors that the name "Cloverfield" is going to become a sort of "Twilight Zone" type of franchise. And who knows?  Maybe there will be others and they will all come together and be related somehow.  In the meantime, this one stands on its own as a creepy little film perfect for a dark and rainy day.


Rosy the Reviewer says...if you are expecting this to be a sequel to "Cloverfield," you will be disappointed, but despite an ending that is a bit much, it doesn't lack for intensity and thrills.


 
 

***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***

232 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?





The Phenix City Story (1955)


Based on a true story, father and son attorneys take on the crime syndicate that has been running their town for 100 years and turned it into Sin City USA.

The film starts with a cold opening of "breaking news," where a reporter is seen interviewing the townspeople about the aftermath of a murder of a nominee for State Attorney General.  The murder has been the catalyst for busting a crime syndicate that had been running the town. The reporter refers to Phenix City rising from the ashes - the name of the city itself being a rather blatant metaphor - but  it's not just a metaphor, it's a real city in Alabama.

After the opening credits, the film flashes back to a dramatic reenactment of a true 1955 story and about how the syndicate was brought down.

Local attorney Albert L. Patterson (John McIntire) is an honest attorney but has turned a blind eye to the corruption in his city, because what can he do?  It's been this way for 100 years.  We know things are bad in Phenix City because we have a sultry singer, a smoked filled room, gambling, jazz and sinister looking guys wearing fedoras. But when Albert's son (Richard Kiley), who is also an attorney, returns from the war, he gets his Dad fired up and they decide to try to make some changes.  But when Albert decides that to make those changes he must run for the State's Attorney General position and get people to vote, the mob, run by good old boy Rhett Tanner (Edward Andrews), is not happy and comes down on him hard. 


I sometimes scratch my had at some of these "1001 movies" I am supposed to see before I die.  Some just don't stand the test of time, in my opinion.  To stand the test of time, the film must have natural acting or at least some innovation that lead to other films following suit.  It must say something significant and the story must be universal to appeal to everyone.

Did this one meet the standard?

Why it's a Must See: "Although its graphic violence was virtually unprecedented in Hollywood, what makes this low-budget shocker truly innovative is its recognition that new content calls for new form. [This film] is a purposely ugly movie, full of ugly rednecks, ugly juke joints, ugly camera angles...Many movies since have portrayed more explicit and elaborate violence, but few have conveyed violence's chaotic force with such intelligent crudeness."
---"1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die"

Let's just say it grew on me.  The acting was a bit over-the-top at times and you might be distracted by the 1950's cars, clothes and clichés, but as the film went on, I was amazed at the brutality and the message is an important one. Get out and vote!

Director Phil Karlson, went on to direct the TV movie "The Scarface Mob" in 1959 which led to "The Untouchables" TV show.

McIntyre, Kiley and Andrews are all faces you will recognize though you might not have known their names and they are journeymen actors who can be counted on to give great performances.  And they do.

Rosy the Reviewer says...if you like films like "On the Waterfront" and "All The King's Men," you might like this film.  And the message is clear. Be sure to vote!



 
***Book of the Week***





The Girl on the Train by Paula Hawkins (2016)


A woman trying to recover from a bad breakup drinks too much and has blackouts, and as she commutes on the train, fantasizes about the people she sees from her train window until one day she is pulled into a real life murder.

Rachel is in bad shape. She is divorced and getting drunk every day.  And every day she takes the commuter train from the suburbs into London and every day she passes the house where she used to happily live with her husband.  She also watches the couple who lives a few doors down from where she used to live.  She has named them Jess and Jason and fantasizes about the happy life they are leading, a life she once had before her husband cheated and left her for another woman who he married and now lives with in their old house.  And to make matters even worse they have a baby together, something Rachel was never able to do and which started her drinking. 

But one day she hears about a murder and it's Jess.  Except her name isn't Jess.  It's Megan, and Rachel realizes she saw something shocking one day from the train that could help the investigation.  However, when she goes to the police, she is considered an unreliable witness.  Is she?  Has her drinking made her hallucinate?  Rachel tries to untangle what's in her head and finds herself tangled up in a complicated story.

Told from three different points of view - Rachel's, Megan's and Anna's (Anna is the woman Rachel's husband married) - we find out just how bad Rachel's life has become since she split from her husband.  She is drunk A LOT. She wakes up many mornings and can't remember what happened the night before. Each woman gives her perspective as the story unfolds.

Hawkins has a gift for dialogue and makes each woman come alive off of the page.  She uses an effective device for telling her story.  Each chapter has a date and is divided into "morning" "afternoon" and "evening." She starts by introducing Rachel in real time and then goes back a few months to introduce Megan and Anna and as the book goes on, the dates catch up with each other as the three women's lives mesh.  It's a fantastic device that makes the book read like you are watching a movie. 

Speaking of movies, the movie version of this book opens TODAY, October 7th, 2016.  I can't wait to see it!





Rosy the Reviewer says...Before you see the film, read the book.  From the very first page you will be pulled in and will not be able to stop reading, and no matter what you think of the movie, you will always have that great read!  However, after reading you will probably think you should stop drinking!




That's it for this week!
 

Thanks for reading!



See you next Friday 
 

for my review of


"The Dressmaker"


 and 

  

The Week in Reviews

(What to See or Read and What to Avoid)


 

and the latest on



"My 1001 Movies I Must See Before  

 I Die Project." 

 

 
If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rosythereviewer


Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.

 

Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 

Go to IMDB.com, find the movie you are interested in.  Once there, click on the link that says "Explore More" on the right side of the screen.  Scroll down to External Reviews and when you get to that page, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.

NOTE:  On some entries, this has changed.  If you don't see "Explore More" on the right side of the screen, scroll down just below the description of the film in the middle of the page. Click where it says "Critics." Look for "Rosy the Reviewer" on the list.

Or if you are using a mobile device, look for "Critics Reviews." Click on that and you will find me alphabetically under "Rosy the Reviewer."