Wednesday, November 9, 2022

Tár and The Week in Reviews

[I review the new movie "Tár" as well as the movie "Mack and Rita."  The Book of the Week is Matthew Perry's memoir "Friends, Lovers, and The Big Terrible Thing"]


Tár(2022)


The story of Lydia Tár, a world reknowned female symphony conductor who has some issues.

'Tis the season.

No, I'm not talking about the holiday season.  I am talking about Oscar season!  This is the time of year when the studios release their big Oscar contenders, and there is no doubt that Cate Blanchett's performance in this movie will be recognized.  As for the movie itself, er...

Hubby said to me as I headed out the door to see this film, "I have a feeling you are going to love Blanchett's performance and hate the film." He was right.

I was already worried because the film was in at two hours and 38 minutes and I often hold that against a film at the outset. I dare it to hold my interest. Few movies need to be that long.  More and more directors seem to have a difficult time editing themselves. So sitting in the theatre, I was already worried but when the film began, I knew I was in big trouble.

You know how you usually get up and leave at the end of the film when the credits are rolling because you don't really care who the grip or the gaffer was on the film or who drove the stars around?  Well, writer/producer/director Todd Field must not have wanted you to do that, because he rolled all of the credits AT THE BEGINNING OF THE FILM with an irritating soundtrack playing in the background. And other than wanting to be sure we had to watch the credits, I have no idea what the purpose of that was except to irritate.

So there I was in the theatre, already twitching in my seat and the movie hadn't even really started yet.

Now don't get me wrong.  I didn't really have a problem with the film once it got started. It actually had an intriguing storyline with a message. The problem was that the story didn't really get started until about an hour in.  Before there was any story, we had to sit through an interview and what was basically an entire class on conducting so by the time all of that was over, I was squirming in my seat.

You see, Lydia Tár (Blanchett) is a world famous conductor, the first female conductor to direct the Berlin Philharmonic.  So to be sure we know just how famous Lydia is, the film begins with an interview where the interviewer (real life New Yorker writer, Adam Gopnik) reads a lengthy introduction (she's an EGOT, an ethnomusicologist, a piano virtuoso and more) and Lydia talks about her musical philosophy. It's all very intellectual. That is followed by Lydia teaching a class to conducting students where she once again shares her philosophy, but this time she humiliates one of the young students who doesn't agree with her.  At this point, we start to learn that Lydia is not very nice. She also has a huge ego.  

As the film progresses, we discover just how self-serving, egotistical and cold she is. She upbraids her wife, Sharon (Nina Hoss), when she returns home to find too many lights on and she orders her assistant, Francesca (Noemie Merlant), around.  Later, we learn that Lydia is also, in fact, a predator. 

When I say it's all very intellectual, I mean that I can't imagine anyone other than a classical music aficionado understanding half of what Lydia talks about in her interview, in the classroom or when she is talking to her mentor. I am totally okay with exposition to get the audience oriented but almost an hour of musical tutelage to do that was too much. I was totally lost before anything really began, and it's not that I know nothing about classical music.  I am familiar with Mahler and his music, I was a fan of Leonard Bernstein, and I have even heard of Elgar, but when Lydia got into naming specific movements of orchestral pieces, using conducting jargon and throwing around the names of other female conductors, I got lost and, dare I say, bored?  And there is a LOT of that in this film, not to mention times when Lydia was speaking German and there were no subtitles. 

As for Lydia's issues, she has acute hearing and keeps hearing noises that keep her awake. She also has a neighbor knocking, she washes her hands a lot, and finds herself running down a dark tunnel.  Guilt perhaps but all devices that are never explained.

Which leads me to question some of Field's directorial choices. That strange opening of the full credits notwithstanding, there were people speaking German, sometimes with subtitles, sometimes not. There seemed to be no rhyme or reason to that. There was a mysterious person, never identified, sending text messages.  An unexplained package arrives.  It goes on and on like that, scenes and ocurrences that seemed to be unrelated and never explained. And I won't even rant, like I usually do, about this being almost three hours long.  Well, I will rant a little.  I think it could have been cut by an entire hour.

But despite the fact that I didn't like this film, I can't fault Cate Blanchett's performance.  

She is a wonder. She is right up there in the Meryl Streep echelon.  When she performs I am a believer.  I forget she is acting.  She mastered the conducting and the German so I give her props for that as well. She will no doubt be nominated for an Oscar for Best Actress. But since I noticed, while watching those interminable opening credits, that she was one of the producers, I do have to also give her some of the blame for this film.

Overall, the production values are beautiful, the film has a message - the exploitation that can occur when someone attains a high level of fame - and it's all very arty, and that, in my estimation, is its downfall. It's as pretentious as that accent over the "a" in Lydia Tár's name, and I can't imagine the average moviegoer enjoying this film. In fact, I really can't believe that anyone other than someone heavily immersed in the music world would enjoy it. And if they say they did, well, the word pretentious again comes to mind.

Rosy the Reviewer says...if you are a huge Cate Blanchett fan and want to watch her performance for 158 minutes, you might like this but as for the film itself, I often say, "I see the bad ones so you don't have to."  And you are welcome.



Mack and Rita (2022)


A 30-year-old wakes up to find that she has turned into her 70-year-old self.

Written by Madeline Walter and Paul Welsh and directed by Katie Aselton, this is one of those "body-swap films," like "Freaky Friday" and "Big," where the main character is transformed into a different person and inhabits a new body.  In this case, it's Mack (Elizabeth Lail), a 30-year-old writer, who doesn't feel comfortable in her own skin.  She thinks of herself as an old lady trapped in the body of a young woman. On a whim she goes into a "regression" tent at a fair, which is really an old tanning bed overseen by a seedy hippie and wishes herself to be her 70-year-old Grammy Martin, who she had always admired and had fun with. Not sure how regression makes you older, but, okay, I will go with it.  Mack thought she was doing this for fun, but when she wakes up, she has literally turned into a 70-year-old, her future old self.  

Enter Diane Keaton and all of her recent comic schtick and it's not pretty.  

Now we have ourselves a "fish out of water" story as Mack/Rita (Keaton) tries to navigate a 30-year-old's life in a 70-year-old's body while at the same time trying to find that regression guy again so she can get back into that tanning bed and return to her old, I mean, young self. 

Mack/Rita confides in her best friend, Carla (Taylour Page), who unbelievably believes her about her predicament but Mack passes herself off to the rest of her young friends as her Aunt Rita. Rita gets entangled in a pilates machine; she tries cryotherapy; she even gets to kiss her cute young neighbor, Jack (Dustin Milligan), who for some reason likes to hang around her. Diane Keaton is a nice looking older woman but it's a stretch that she would pull a cute young guy like him. Rita tries to do stuff that a 30-year-old might do and it's supposed to be funny as she falls down and gets flustered (making fun of old people is always good for a laugh, right?), but as a 70+ year old myself, I was offended. But Rita finds a posse of old ladies to hang out with, has that cute young guy and starts having such a good time as an old lady, Rita isn't sure she wants to go back to being Mack. Naturally as these movies are prone to do, Mack learns to value herself. I just wish the writers and director had valued something called character development and originality. Worst of all?  It was a comedy that wasn't funny.

Will Mack be able to get back to her 30-year-old self? I eventually thought, who cares?

Ordinarily, I would like a story like this, but in addition to the lack of character development, my big problem was and is Diane Keaton.  I used to be a huge fan.  I mean she was in "The Godfather" and "Reds" and "Annie Hall," for god's sake, "Annie Hall" being one of the funniest films of all time.  But the problem is, Diane has seemed to turn herself into a real-life version of Annie Hall and that is not funny, especially in a 76-year-old woman.  She has la-ti-da-ed herself into a character that gets on my nerves with her big hats and eccentric outfits. She now plays flibberdigibbets and whenever she appears on a talk show, she acts so dippy that I can't watch.  And I guess she is not embarrassed by that behavior because in this movie she even references her stints on "Ellen" by ordering red wine with ice cubes (when she would show up on "Ellen," that was a thing).  So obviously Diane thinks we like the persona she now gives us. And her movies are just more of the same.  I didn't like "Poms" and I didn't like this one. 

Rosy the Reviewer says...if you are a big Diane Keaton fan, you might like this but just remember you will never have this 90 minutes back again.


***The Book of the Week***


Friends, Lovers and The Big Terrible Thing by Matthew Perry (2022)



Matthew Perry, star of the TV show "Friends" shares his story of addiction and redemption.

“Hi, my name is Matthew, although you may know me by another name. My friends call me Matty. And I should be dead.” So begins Matthew Perry's harrowing story of addiction.

If you haven't heard about this memoir, you must have been under a rock or not have a TV.  Perry has been on every talk show and newsfeed running up to publication of this memoir.  He really wants to tell his story and it is a fascinating one. 

Best known as Chandler on the TV show “Friends,” Perry grew up in Canada but his parents divorced when he was very young. His mother was Pierre Trudeau's press secretary and his father was an actor who moved to L.A. and eventually became famous as the original Old Spice Guy.  Perry's mother remarried Keith Morrison of "Dateline" fame. You know, the guy who always purrs "Was it murrrrder?" 

With his mother in Canada and his Dad in L.A. Matty was shuttled back and forth alone on a plane, an "unaccompanied minor" and that fueled his lifelong feelings of insecurity and abandonment, a hole difficult to fill. But he tried. First, by being the funny guy, then with alcohol. That first drink at 14 was a revelation. While his teenaged friends were throwing up after their first big binge, he thought he had died and gone to heaven. That empty hole was starting to be filled.  What he didn't know was that he would almost die and he was already on his way to hell.

Then Perry moved to L.A. to live with his Dad, and he thought fame would solve all of this problems.  He already had a big alcohol habit but toiled in supporting TV roles and eventually landed the role of Chandler in “Friends," and he thought, finally, everything was going to be okay. But then he discovered opioids and his life-long battle with “The Big Terrible Thing,” his addiction, really began. He says in the book that if you watch "Friends," you can tell when he was drinking heavily and when he was mostly on pills. When he was drinking he was heavy; when he was using pills, he was skinny.  During one hiatus, he lost 50 pounds and they had to dress him in baggy clothes to cover that up when the season started up again.  At one point, he was taking 55 opioids a day.  He has been through 65 detoxes.

But it’s not all tragedy. Now sober and self-aware, Perry is grateful for his life and uses his self-deprecating humor to candidly talk about “Friends”, lovers, and yes, The Big Terrible Thing in hopes that he can help others.  Helping others has finally filled that big terrible hole.

Rosy the Reviewer says...celebrity watchers and fans of "Friends" will enjoy the behind the scenes anecdotes and Perry's encounters with other celebrities but this is also a tale of hope for those struggling with addiction.


Thanks for reading!


See you again soon!

If you enjoyed this post, feel free to like it and share it on Facebook, Twitter, or other sites; email it to your friends and/or follow me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rosythereviewer 

And next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). Go to IMDB.com, find the movie you are interested in.  Scroll over to the right of the synopsis to where it says "Critic Reviews" - Click on that and if I have reviewed that film, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list (NOTE:  IMDB keeps moving stuff around so if you don't find "Critics Reviews" where I am sending you, look around.  It's worth it)!

(NOTE:  If you are looking for a particular movie or series, check out this cool site: JustWatch.  It tells you where you can access all TV series and movies)


Monday, October 24, 2022

But Is It Worth Watching?

[I weigh in on some popular series:  "The Watcher," "Bad Sisters," "The Patient," "Real Girlfriends in Paris," "The Mole" and the new Netflix cooking show "Easy Bake Battle."]  

"The Watcher" is currently the most popular series on Netflix. It seems the entire country is watching it.  But should you watch "The Watcher?" 

Let's see.


The Watcher 





A family moves into their dream house only to be stalked by "The Watcher." 

This is your classic tale of the malevolent house. An innocent family buys their dream house and then finds out its sad history and then everything goes to hell.  Remember "The Amityville Horror?"  Well, this one is kind of like that but in this case the evil comes from someone watching the family and sending them threatening letters.

Writer/Producer/Director Ryan Murphy ("Glee," "American Horror Story," "Pose," "Dahmer-Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story") has taken a true life mystery and Murphy-ized it into a gothic horror story.  

The series is based on the true story of the Broaddus Family, Derek and Maria, who bought their dream home at 657 Boulevard in Westfield, New Jersey in 2014.  Before moving in, they started renovating the house and soon started to receive anonymous letters from "The Watcher," someone who claimed to have lived in the house and was now in charge of watching over it.  There were four letters, all menacing, and, because of those letters, the family never moved in and eventually sold the house five years later for a loss of $400,000. "The Watcher" was never identified.

So those are the basic facts of this story, and beyond the basic facts - that the owners of a beautiful house in Westfield, New Jersey received scary letters signed "The Watcher" - the rest of this series is complete fiction. Ryan Murphy discovered this story and was off and running.

Murphy has taken the true story and run with it, adding his dramatic touches, throwing in a variety of suspects, along with a smarmy police detective (Christopher McDonald), Theodora Birch (Noma Dumezweni), an eccentric private investigator, many red herrings, a satanic cult and even the latest phenomenon of "phrogging." There is everything in this but the kitchen sink, including the real life List murders, a mass murder that happened in Westfield in 1971. John List (here called John Graff) killed his entire family and then went on the run for 18 years.  Murphy has added that as something that also happened in the house at 657 Boulevard but those murders did not happen there.

In this fictionalized account, Naomi Watts and Bobby Cannavale play Nora and Dean Brannock, who buy the house and move in with their son, Carter (Luke David Blumm), and daughter, Ellie (Isabel Gravitt).  Nora is an artist and Dean is a lawyer and this house is a chance to get out of the city and live the American Dream, even though it's a bit beyond their means. Well, it's a lot beyond their means. In fact, they have some real money problems. Soon after moving into the house, the Brannocks start receiving menacing letters from "The Watcher." 

So who is "The Watcher?"

Is it Maureen (Margo Martindale) and Mitch (Richard Kind), the odd, older, unfriendly and disapproving neighbors across the street who sit in their yard chairs and watch the Brannocks?  Is it, Pearl (Mia Farrow), the nutty local historian for the Westfield Preservation Society who is obsessed with the dumb waiter in the house (note: the dumb waiter plays a role) and who threatens to take the Brannocks to court if they disturb it or make changes to the house that the preservation society doesn't approve of?  Or is it Pearl's brother, Jasper (Terry Kinney) who has PTSD from finding the Graff family murdered in the house years before?  What about Dakota (Henry Hunter Hall), the young kid who is putting in the security system?  Or Karen (Jennifer Coolidge), the real estate agent who is dying for Nora to sell the house so she can list it?  And what about Theodora Birch, that private investigator that the Brannocks hired to help find The Watcher. What's her deal?  There is a lot going on in this bucolic little town, and everyone is a suspect and everyone is suspicious. And the bottom line is that everyone is watching everyone.

Naomi Watts is always good, though after seeing her last movie, "Goodnight Mommy," and now this, I'm wondering if she is headed for a career in horror films. And I can't help but ask, "What's with those huge black glasses?" But that aside, Bobby Cannavale is the one I had a problem with.  He is perfect gangster material but as a harried husband, I struggled with it, but like the show, he grew on me. But why the character of Theodora Birch?  She didn't really seem to have a purpose. In fact, there were many characters like that, who made me wonder, "What are they doing here?"  Like I said, Murphy threw everything he had at this.

So the series gives us many suspects but in the real life story?  Who sent those letters? You decide. So far, no one knows, but there are rumors out there - one is that the husband did it.  Isn't that always the case with true crime? The husband did it. 

And there is a sort of message here: There is a dark side to the American Dream, when that dream is money, status and a big house and even with all of that you still don't feel safe. 

But is "The Watcher" worth watching? (I love a little alliteration, don't you)?

After watching the first episode, I was thinking, no.  It was very over-the-top and over dramatic.  I mean Mia Farrow in pig tails and big glasses was enough to turn me off right at the beginning.  And other characters were so out there that at times I thought I was watching a comedy. Jennifer Coolidge alone makes me laugh without even doing anything. And later, some of the side storylines went completely off the rails. A satanic cult? A murder/suicide across the street? C'mon. But Ryan Murphy is never not compelling, so I hung in there and, like Bobby, the series grew on me...until the end.

The last episode...oh, dear. 


Rosy the Reviewer says...I can't wholeheartedly recommend this, but it's an intriguing story and I did stick with it.  However, it could have been executed better, but if you are a Ryan Murphy fan and like your mysteries strange and way over-the-top with some comedy moments (that maybe aren't supposed to be funny), you might enjoy this, and, hey, if everyone else is watching it, you want to be in the know around the water cooler at work, right? (Are people still at work?  Are there still water coolers)? (Netflix)



Bad Sisters 


There are five Irish Garvey sisters - Eva, Grace, Ursula, Bibi and Becka and four of them are gravely concerned about how Grace's husband, John Paul (Claes Bang), treats their sister, Grace. They all have reasons to hate him. And then he turns up dead.

And that's not a spoiler.  The series begins with John Paul's funeral and it unfolds in flashbacks as we discover just what a bad guy John Paul was. Let's just say the first episode is called "The Prick" for a reason.  That's John Paul.  And he was.

But first, let's get to know the Garvey sisters.

  • Eva Garvey (Sharon Horgan) is the oldest and feels the most protective of her sisters since she had to take care of all of them after the death of their parents. Eva is single and feeling her time running out for having children.  She and John Paul don't get along, not just for how he treats her sister, Grace, but they also work at the same architectural firm and are up for the same promotion and John Paul is not above doing some dirty stuff to ruin Eva's reputation.

  • Grace Williams (Anne-Marie Duff) is the second eldest sister of the Garvey family, John Paul's wife, and the mother of their daugher, Blanaid (Saise Quinn). Grace loves her husband, but he is, as the first episode is named, "A Prick." He is controlling and cringey and she is losing her close relationship with her sisters because of him. He demeans her and has done everything he can to make her feel bad about herself.  But don't give up on Grace.

  • Ursula Flynn (Eva Birthistle), the middle sister of the Garvey family, is a nurse, is married to Donal (Jonjo O'Neill) and has three children.  She is also having an extramarital affair with Ben (Peter Coonan) and, when John Paul discovers the affair, he threatens to expose her with some racy pictures she thought she was sending to Ben.

  • Becka Garvey (Eve Hewson), youngest sister of the Garvey family, is a massage therapist who hopes to open her own massage studio.  John Paul was going to help her with that until he reneged on his promise.

  • Bibi Garvey (Sarah Greene), second youngest sister of the Garvey family, hates John Paul after he is responsible for the car accident that resulted in the loss of her eye. She wears an eyepatch, and is the impetus for the sisters' decision to murder John Paul.

So...all of the sisters have a reason to want John Paul dead.  And, like I said, he really is a bad guy. You will want him dead, too!

Each sister is different and interesting and you can love them all or pick your favorite but you will root for them because - did I mention this?  John Paul is a very bad man.

So they decide they need to murder him. But how? They try various and humorous means, but these women are not good at murder. He's like a cockroach.  They can't seem to get rid of him.  

So how did he die?  Well, that's why you keep watching.  And you keep watching because these sisters are fun to watch. 

Then to make matters even more interesting, enter the Claffin brothers, the insurance investigators who represent Claffin & Sons.  Grace has asked for the insurance pay out for John Paul's policy and they suspect foul play.  They also do not want to pay it for reasons that become clear later.  Thomas Claffin (Brian Gleeson, son of Brendon) embarks on an insurance investigation that threatens to uncover the sister's plans.  To complicate matters, Becka becomes involved with Matt, the other, and extremely handsome Claffin brother played by Daryl McCormack, who those of you who watched the charming Emma Thompson movie "Good Luck To You, Leo Grande" will recognize as her handsome escort. 

The series goes back and forth from the present to the past in a pleasing way (not the usual confusing flashbacks and flash forwards we sometimes encounter), as the sisters try to find a way to off John Paul, and the Claffin brothers try to get out of paying Grace the insurance money. You see, the Claffin & Sons insurance company has its own issues so they have to figure out a way to prove that John Paul's death was not an accident.

This all sounds very serious but it's actually very funny, the dark kind of funny.

Conceived by Sharon Horgan, Brett Baer and Dave Finkel (Horgan was also one of the producers), this series is a follow-up to Horgan's stint in the wonderful "Catastrophe" and shows that she is much more than a comic actress in a quirky rom-com.  As for Claes Bang, I first saw him in a Danish film (he's Danish) called "The Square."  He has since made his mark in several films since, like "The Girl in the Spider's Web," and here he does a good job of playing an Irishman, a bad one.  Gleeson and McCormack are also fun to watch, and I predict McCormack will become a very hot leading man.  I mean, c'mon, he's HOT! But the entire ensemble is first rate. 

But is it worth watching?

Rosy the Reviewer says... Yes! This is a celebration of sisterhood.  These "bad sisters" are really good sisters who are loyal and love each other very much and it is a joy to watch.  And if you read my reviews regularly, you will know that I judge on whether or not a film or series is a satisfying experience.  I think you will find this fun to watch and the ending very satisfying. Brilliant writing, brilliant actresses and a brilliant villain. (Apple+)


The Patient 


Every psychiatrist's nightmare.

Created by Joel Fields and Joseph Weisberg, "The Patient" stars Steve Carell as psychiatrist Alan Strauss who finds himself locked up and chained to the floor at the home of one of his patients. Turns out, Sam, his patient, is a serial killer who wants to stop those killing urges of his and thinks the only way to do that is to have the doctor all to himself.
You Harry Potter fans might recognize Domhnall Gleeson (he played Bill Weasley and is another son of Brendon - see "Bad Sisters" above) as Sam and the series is mostly what the Brits call a “two-hander,” Alan and Sam alone in the basement with Alan trying his best to keep Sam from killing again while at the same time trying to figure out how to get Sam to let him go.
Alan is Jewish and when he is alone, he spends time thinking about his wife and his son, Ezra. Through flashbacks, we learn that Alan’s wife, Beth, was a Jewish cantor. Their adult son, Ezra (Andrew Leeds), has become Orthodox causing frustrating family events and estrangement that affected Beth’s health and she has recently died. Alan also thinks about his own therapist (David Alan Grier) and has mental conversations with him that gives the viewer more insight into Alan and forces him to examine his own life. Sam isn’t the only one with issues.
I am not usually a huge Steve Carell fan but here he embodies the kind of therapist you would want to have. He emanates warmth and kindness and trust, which is a LOT considering he has been imprisoned by a serial killer and there is a man Sam wants to kill imprisoned in the other room. Oh, didn’t I mention that?

But is it worth watching?

Rosy the Reviewer says…Yes! This brings a whole new meaning to the guy living in his mother's basement. From the start, you will be hooked and want to know what is going to happen to Alan and Sam. A tense, sometimes humorous but always fascinating look at empathy, isolation and the world of therapy and one of the best series of the year. Not be missed. Trust me. I'm a criticologist!
(Hulu)


Real Girlfriends in Paris


Six Gen-Z’s follow their dreams and navigate the pitfalls of friendship and romance while trying to find themselves, all with the City of Love as their backdrop.
This looks like Bravo’s attempt to pull in a younger crowd to it’s “Housewives” franchise, except these ladies aren’t rich housewives, they are twenty-something ex-pat singles living in Paris, and so far no one seems to have an axe to grind nor has anyone angrily flipped a table. It’s more “Emily in Paris” meets “Sex and the City.
Victoria is 25, from a conservative family in Texas, and likes girls, but hasn’t yet come out to her mother. She had been briefly married to her college boyfriend but ended the marriage when she discovered his cheating.
Adja, who is also 25, has Senegalese roots, has family in Paris and is fluent in French. She finds European men more romantic than American men and she is working her way through a few.
Margaux, 26, has French parents and spent her life living in both New York City and France. Her Dad currently supports her until she “finds herself.” So far she has dabbled in several careers – the French would call her a dilettante. Currently she thinks she wants to open an agency to represent artists. We shall see.
Kacey is 27, African American and has lived in Paris off and on for three years. She teaches English part-time and babysits and is hoping to get a visa so she can stay in Paris permanently.
And there is a real life Emily. She is 22, has an internship at a fashion house but unlike that other Emily in Paris, knows little about fashion.
And finally, Anya. She is the only one not in her twenties. She is a fashionista, licensed tour guide and the OG of the group – 32 – and she has been in Paris for ten years so she is the shoulder the other women sometimes need.

I have a soft spot for “Emily in Paris” because it helped me endure lockdown during the height of the pandemic. This series doesn’t quite have the same charm as “Emily,” but it still has that je ne sais quoi that makes me want to know what is going to happen to these young women. And just like “Emily,” there is fashion (which you know I love) and, of course, Paris (which I really love)!

This series celebrates female friendship and six cute young women living in Paris? What’s not to like?

But is it worth watching?

Rosy the Reviewer says…Yes, for me anyway! Lots of fodder here for some interesting and fun storylines. But it's very fluffy and sometimes silly, so if you are not a fan of Bravo's reality shows, this probably isn't for you. (Bravo)


The Mole


Twelve players compete for a cash prize, except it's not really a fair contest. One of them is a mole who is trying to sabotage them. Who is the mole?

This is a reboot of a show that ran from 2001 to 2008. I loved that show back in the day, one of the original reality game shows. It's actually a kind of intellectual version of "Survivor," with some mystery thrown in. Who is trying to sabotage the other players? Contestants must complete tasks to win money but there is a saboteur amongst them and they need to figure out who that is.

Hosted by MSNBC host Alex Wagner (back in 2001 it was a very young Anderson Cooper), this time the contestants are in various parts of Australia and have to complete missions that include zip lining, climbing mountain peaks, treasure hunting and trying to follow homing pidgeons, all within a certain amount of time. If they complete the task, they add money to a pot that one of them will ultimately win. But if The Mole is able to sabotage, they win nothing.

At the end of every episode, the contestants must take a quiz that asks questions to identify about who they think the Mole is and the person scoring the lowest is eliminated.

Who is The Mole? Can you figure it out?

But is it worth watching?

Rosy the Reviewer says...Yes, it's a unique take on competition shows, so if you are a "Survivor" or "The Challenge" fan and enjoy a bit of mystery, this is for you! (Netflix)


Easy Bake Battle 


Home cooks compete to see who can make the easiest and fastest dishes.

If you like cooking competitions featuring home cooks, this is a new one.

No, they don’t really have to use a toy Hasbro “Easy-Bake Oven,” though there is a giant state-of-the-art version that plays a role in the competitions. The keyword for this show is “easy.” The recipes must be easy. In addition to easy, the dishes must also be delicious, well-presented and in one competition, "The Dish Dash," fast. fast. The cook who finishes the fastest gets extra points. That is followed by the “Easy-Bake,” where the cooks must create a dish using only the oven.

The contestants and the judges also share cooking hacks to make cooking easier, such as cooking bacon in a waffle maker, poaching eggs in the oven in a muffin tray, crushing ice in a food processor and using dental floss to cut dough.
Hosted by Anthony Porowski (“Queer Eye”) and featuring a different celebrity guest judge per episode, three home cooks square off against each other, with one winning $25,000 and then moving on to the next episode in hopes of winning up to $100,000. There are eight episodes, all with different themes (late night snacks, holiday cooking, kid-friendly eats), each episode less than 40 minutes so you can binge this entire series in one day if you are so inclined.

But is it worth watching?

Rosy the Reviewer says…Yes and no. It is entertaining and there are some good ideas for home cooks, though some of the hacks may seem a bit lame for experienced cooks. I was also frustrated that I couldn't find the recipes. (Netflix)

Thanks for reading!


See you again soon!

If you enjoyed this post, feel free to like it and share it on Facebook, Twitter, or other sites; email it to your friends and/or follow me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rosythereviewer 

And next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). Go to IMDB.com, find the movie you are interested in.  Scroll over to the right of the synopsis to where it says "Critic Reviews" - Click on that and if I have reviewed that film, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list (NOTE:  IMDB keeps moving stuff around so if you don't find "Critics Reviews" where I am sending you, look around.  It's worth it)!

(NOTE:  If you are looking for a particular movie or series, check out this cool site: JustWatch.  It tells you where you can access all TV series and movies)







Wednesday, October 5, 2022

"Blonde" and the Week in Reviews

[I review the new movie "Blonde" as well as a little British mystery film: "Miss Willoughby and the Haunted Bookshop." The Book of the Week is Kelly Ripa's "not-a-memoir," "Live Wire: Long-Winded Stories."]

Blonde (2022)



A very fictionalized account of the life of Marilyn Monroe.

There has been quite a bit of controversy surrounding this movie with it taking a lot of criticism about its accuracy when it came to Monroe's life.  However, what you may not know is that this movie is based on Joyce Carol Oates' book of the same name, a book that was a work of fiction.  It was her fictionalized account of Marilyn. So with that in mind...

I get the controversy, but I am not against movies having creative license when it comes to telling true stories.  What I am against is an unpleasant film experience. This is not just a fictionalized account of Marilyn's life but a horror movie.

Marilyn Monroe was born Norma Jean Mortenson (baptized Baker) in 1926. Raised in Los Angeles, without a father, her mother suffered from mental illness and Norma spent much of her childhood in foster homes and an orphanage.  She started out as a pin-up model during WW II and soon found fame in the movies as a "blonde bombshell," and became one of the most famous sex symbols of the 50's and 60's starring in such movies as "Gentlemen Prefer Blondes," "The Seven Year Itch" and "Some Like it Hot." But her turbulent personal life seemed to outweigh her career accomplishments.  She was married to James Doherty at the age of 16 (not touched on in the movie), baseball hero, Joe DiMaggio, and playwright Arthur Miller, neither of whom seemed to really take her seriously.  She supposedly had an affair with JFK and she struggled with drug addiction. She died mysteriously in 1962 at the age of 36 and she remains a pop culture icon to this day.

Written and directed by Andrew Dominick, the movie touches on much of that, but quickly skips from the orphanage to modeling to acting without much detail about how Norma Jean got there and became Marilyn. The film mostly concentrates on the sad side of Marilyn:  her exploitation by men, her mentally ill mother, her absent father, an abortion that she never got over (with a very cringy abortion scene), a miscarriage that she also never got over, drugs and possibly her own mental illness. The film also has another very cringy, an oral sex scene with JFK. In fact, there are many cringy scenes in this film. 

Marilyn, played by Ana de Armas, is portrayed as a victim who just happened to make it big.  All she really wanted was to be loved and to be taken seriously and to find that absent father.  But according to this, that never happened.  She was a victim who was taken advantage of time and time again. It's a dreary and grim story, and at almost three hours, it's a dreary, grim, and over-dramatic film experience that eventually becomes irritating because it seems to never end. 

Production wise, the film was also irritating.  It moves back and forth from black and white to color without a rhyme or reason.  At first, I thought the black and white sections were memories or the past but that didn't add up. I never did figure out what that device was supposed to embody, but it bugged the heck out of me.

The only thing I really liked in this film was Ana de Armas' performance which is extraordinary.  She embodies Marilyn and I can envision an Oscar nomination for her performance.  I just wish she had more to work with.

Much of the controversy surrounding this film is about the factual accuracy of this depiction of Marilyn's life. Did Marilyn's mother really try to kill her? Did Joe really beat her up during their marriage? Did JFK really rape her? What if she was a drug addict, what if mental illness was taking her over? Lots of what ifs and did that really happen questions. I don't mind the questions. What I minded was the relentless dreariness of this story.

Yes, Marilyn had a rough life in many ways but what's the lesson here? Is there one?  If there was, I didn't get it.  Men in power exploit women?  Yes, we know that. Horrible childhoods result in messed up adults. Again, yes. Marilyn Monroe was really little Norma Jean trying to find her Daddy. Okay. But when all of this bad stuff goes on and on with no let up and no real message, it feels like Marilyn is being exploited all over again and leaves the viewer feeling exploited too.

Marilyn Monroe may have been dead for 60 years but her memory deserves more than this.  Yes, she was probably exploited in life, but I don't like the feeling I get watching her memory get exploited in death. 

Rosy the Reviewer says...according to this film, Marilyn had an extremely unpleasant life, and for me, this was an extremely unpleasant film experience. (In theatres and on Netflix)


Miss Willoughby and the Haunted Bookshop (2021)


An amateur detective investigates some strange goings on at a bookshop.

Miss Elizabeth Willoughby (Nathalie Cox) is a poor little rich girl who grows up to be a professor and an amateur sleuth.  Her parents died when she was very young and she was left with her father's friend, Robert (Kelsey Grammer), an American, as her guardian. As a young girl, Lizzie was an insatiable reader, so Robert let little Miss Willoughby read the morning away but in the afternoon he taught her martial arts, which we later learn will come in handy one day.

When Lizzie's friend, Helen (Louise Bangay), an owner of a bookshop, reports some strange goings on there, she asks Lizzie for help. Helen believes she is being haunted by the ghost of her late father. Helen's husband (Steven Elder) believes Helen is going mad.  Is the bookshop really haunted or his Helen's husband gaslighting her?  Lizzie is on the case.

Written by Kate Wood, Chad Law, and Josh Ridgway (story by Philippe Martinez) and directed by Brad Wilson, this is a bit slow to get going but very much in the vein of British TV shows like "All Creatures Great and Small" and "Grantchester," very cosy and quaint and old fashioned, with a mystery that is not really a mystery.  Let's just say, there is nothing here to get your knickers in a twist about.  It's all very uncomplicated and "G rated," but it's a pleasant story with a pleasant cast. If you were a fan of "Murder She Wrote," it's kind of like that, and this is supposedly the first in a series which would be a welcome addition to that genre.

Rosy the Reviewer says...if you need an escape into the beautiful English countryside with some pleasant people, and you like your mysteries British, ones that won't tax your brain too much, this is for you. (For rent on most streaming platforms)


***The Book of the Week***


"Live Wire: Long-Winded Short Stories" by Kelly Ripa (2022)



Actress and talk show host Kelly Ripa does her usual over-sharing, this time in a book.

Actress and talk show host Ripa (“Live with Kelly and Ryan”) wants readers to know that this is not really a memoir.  It’s a series of essays and she wrote them all by herself.  But fans will be happy to know there are plenty of anecdotes about her life delivered in her characteristic self-deprecating humor.  

She laments the difficulty of writing a book, she shares the difference between North and South Jersey (she’s from the South), muses on parenting (“I thought as long as my kids didn’t get strep throat often and had cookies for the class bake sale I was killing it in the parenting department”), the empty nest, mother/daughter relationships, botox and plastic surgery, auditioning for Live! and her tenuous relationship with ex-cohost Regis Philbin. She also overshares stories about her 25 year marriage to her husband, Mark Consuelos, whom she met on the set of “All My Children,” the birth of her first child, an embarrassing chance encounter with Richard Gere along with a lot more oversharing, but fans of Live! are probably used to that.  Ripa exhibits the same openness, bawdy humor, and TMI that her fans have come to expect.

I laughed out loud at much of this and thought, gee, I should watch the show.  So I gave it a try.  What I discovered was that Ripa is funny on the page, way too much for me in person.

Rosy the Reviewer says...an easy funny read that includes celebrity insider info (if you are into that kind of thing) and if you are a fan, you will love this, but you don't need to be a fan of "Live with Kelly and Ryan" to get some laughs from this! (Check it out from your local library)

 

Thanks for reading!


See you again soon!

If you enjoyed this post, feel free to like it and share it on Facebook, Twitter, or other sites; email it to your friends and/or follow me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rosythereviewer 

And next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). Go to IMDB.com, find the movie you are interested in.  Scroll over to the right of the synopsis to where it says "Critic Reviews" - Click on that and if I have reviewed that film, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list (NOTE:  IMDB keeps moving stuff around so if you don't find "Critics Reviews" where I am sending you, look around.  It's worth it)!

(NOTE:  If you are looking for a particular movie or series, check out this cool site: JustWatch.  It tells you where you can access all TV series and movies)