Showing posts with label Novel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Novel. Show all posts

Friday, January 13, 2017

"Hidden Figures" and The Week in Reviews

[I review the new movie "Hidden Figures" as well as the DVDs "American Honey" and "Morgan."  The Book of the Week is the novel "Nine Women, One Dress."  I also bring you up-to-date with "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die" with Jean Luc Godard's "Contempt" where Brigitte Bardot's butt plays a major role]




Hidden Figures


A biopic about three little known African American women who played key roles in America's space race during the early 1960's.

When this film was first advertised and the posters started appearing in the theatres, I had little interest in the film.  For one thing, it was about women mathematicians working on America's space program.  I am not really that interested in movies about the space program and I hate math.  I also thought this movie was going to be just another old-fashioned film about women struggling to triumph in a man's world.

Yes, the movie is about the space program and math and it is about women struggling to make it in what was viewed as a man's profession.  But the film is so much more than that.  It is also a movie about racism, discrimination against women, strong female friendships, and Kevin Costner is in it, all things I AM interested in.  And yes, it's an old-fashioned film but that's a good thing because there is nothing wrong with good old-fashioned compelling storytelling.

This movie is a gem.

The film, based on the book of the same name by Margot Lee Shetterly, highlights three African American women - Katherine Goble (later Katherine Johnson) played by Taraji P. Henson, Mary Jackson (Janelle Monae) and Dorothy Vaughan (Octavia Spencer) - who, despite the racism and discrimination still so rampant in the 1960s's, played key roles in the United States' Space Program in Langley, Virginia. 

In the early 1960's, the United States was in a "space race," with Russia.  Russia had already put a man in space and we Americans don't like to be second. It was also the height of the Cold War, when we didn't like Russia very much, unlike what it seems like today.  

Goble/Johnson, Jackson and Vaughan started out at NASA as "human computers." That's what they called people who computed before computers came along. These workers, many of them female, checked the calculations of the male scientists and engineers, but even at NASA, working for the United States Government, in the early 1960's, African Americans were segregated at work, and those three women worked in the "Colored Computers" room together. All three were educated, extremely smart women who were ambitious. Mary, the smart talking scrappy one, wanted to be an engineer. Dorothy, who ostensibly was the supervisor of the computing room, wanted to be recognized as the supervisor with the title and pay.

But the film is mostly about Katherine, who was recognized early as a mathematical genius, and who is called to work directly on the Alan Shepard and John Glenn launches with Al Harrison (Kevin Costner) and the other male scientists and engineers in The Space Task Group, because she is the only one who knows analytical geometry.

All three women must create their own paths to be recognized and reach their goals despite the racism and misogyny of the time.

The film is a buddy picture of sorts as the women travel to work together and share their struggles to get ahead.  But the film is also a sad reminder of the discrimination that African Americans suffered as recently as only 50 years ago.
We are reminded that African Americans could not use the same restrooms or drink out of the same drinking fountains as whites, even at work. In the 1960's, they were still riding in the back of the bus, and the public library even had a "colored" and a "whites only" section. Horrible.  And despite Brown vs. The Board of Education, a 1954 Supreme Court decision that declared segregated schools unconstitutional, in some states African Americans still couldn't go to white schools, as we see when Mary wants to take some night classes to become an engineer and the only classes are at an all-white school.

So racism and discrimination against African Americans was still rampant in the 1960's. Add African American women into that equation (pardon the pun) and the discrimination is doubled.  Could an African American man become an engineer?  Maybe.  An African American woman?  Absurd!  Should a woman be allowed in a briefing room?  Absolutely not. Should her name go on the report that she wrote? No. In fact, at NASA the African American women doing the computing were practically invisible, hidden, that is, when they weren't being looked down upon by their white superiors. We are reminded that people of color, and women especially, had to work harder and better than their white counterparts if they wanted to have the same opportunities.

There is a telling thread in the film that begins when Katherine is promoted to The Space Task Group to work with Al Harrison and his people who were working on the space launches and who were all white. There was covert hostility when she showed up for work that became overt when someone labeled a separate coffee pot on the break table "colored."  And no one gave any thought to where Katherine might use the restroom.  There were no "colored" restrooms in that wing, so rain or shine, she was forced to run a half mile back to her old office to use the "colored restroom."  It makes for some humor, especially with Pharrell Williams' song "Runnin" in the background, but it's a humor clouded in darkness and brings its point home. Katherine suffered in silence until, finally, when Harrison wonders where Katherine has been and calls her on the carpet in front of everyone, Katherine gives an impassioned speech about the inequities she has had to endure. 

I am amazed that Taraji B. Henson was not nominated for a Golden Globe. Her portrayal of Katherine Goble/Johnson is a sensitive, quiet performance, but a very strong one with a bit of humor as she is prone to pushing her glasses up her nose, nerd style.  There is not a smidgeon of Cookie ("Empire") in sight.  I hope the Oscars recognize this wonderful performance. Octavia Spencer was her usual self.  She always brings in solid, sensitive performances, but I didn't see a stretch in this performance, so her Golden Globe nomination was surprising when there wasn't one for Henson.

Kevin Costner is my main Hollywood crush so he can do no wrong in my eyes, and here he gets to be the tough but reasonable boss who recognizes Katherine's worth. Jim Parsons as Katherine's supervisor and arch nemesis, Jim Stafford, is surprisingly good, playing against type.  Likewise, Kirsten Dunst gets the dubious pleasure of a job well-done playing a condescending supervisor holding Dorothy back from her desire to become a supervisor.  The rest of the cast, which includes Janelle Monae and Mahershala Ali, both of whom were in "Moonlight" together, are all first-rate.

Katherine (Goble) Johnson came up with the "hidden figures" needed for a successful launch of John Glenn into space, but Katherine, Mary Jackson and Dorothy Vaughn were themselves "hidden figures" in American history until they were celebrated by Spetterling in her book.  Her subtitle tells it all: "The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race."  I am so glad she told their story and that director Theodore Melfi (who also adapted the script with Allison Schroeder) did them justice in this film.

Rosy the Reviewer says...a beautifully written and acted inspirational movie that is also an important reminder of what American people of color and, especially women, had to struggle against to be seen and heard. Also an important reminder to and inspiration for girls that they can be good at math!  A must-see for the whole family.

BTW, I cried...and you know what that means!





***Some Movies You Might Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)!
 
On DVD






American Honey (2016)


A teenage girl joins a group of young people who travel the country selling magazine subscriptions door-to-door. 

You know those kids who were so rampant in the 90's - they went door to door selling magazines and giving us sob stories?  I fell for it a couple of times, especially when one overweight girl said she was having a panic attack and could she come in and sit down.  I felt sorry for her and bought several subscriptions.  And then we all found out that those supposed sad teens with the sad stories were really part of a huge shadowy operation where the kids were bused into neighborhoods and sent out all day to sell those magazines. They would say or do whatever they needed to to sell.  One kid told me he was at Stanford and his aunt lived around the block from me.  Did I ask his aunt's name or her address?  No.  I've always been a sucker for charming and handsome young men.

Anyway, that's what this movie is about - those kids, here a disaffected, hard-partying motley crew, seemingly lost souls who travel from town to town in a van, let loose in affluent areas and hoping to tell a story that the person who answers the door will buy - "I am in a contest and if I sell enough magazine subscriptions I will get a free semester of college" or "I was in trouble but am now trying to turn my life around" - none of which were true.

Sasha Lane plays Star, a young girl with attitude from a poor, rough background who is not particularly likable.  She meets Jake (Shia LaBeouf, the only big name star in this film, if you can call him a big name star), a guy who is part of a travelling group of young people who go from town to town selling magazine subscriptions.  They embark on a romance but the film is mostly about Star and her trying to figure out life. 

When Krystal (Riley Keough, Elvis Presley's granddaughter), the "boss," interviews Star, she asks her where she is from.  Star answers "Texas," to which Crystal replies, "You're a southern girl, a real American Honey, like me ("American Honey" is also a song by Lady Antebellum)."

However, Krystal isn't really the boss.  She is just another cog in the wheel of what is most likely a pyramid scheme in a much larger corporate entity. As these kids travel from town to town pursuing their own version of the American Dream, selling in affluent tree-lined neighborhoods and then spending the night in gritty neighborhoods and seedy motels, the divide between America's rich and poor is laid out before us.

Written and directed by Andrea Arnold, in her first movie filmed outside the U.K, the movie has a documentary feel with its shaky hand-held camera work and its small screen (no widescreen here).  Most of the actors are non-professionals who Arnold recruited for the film.  Even Lane, the star of the film, was discovered by Arnold on a beach and had never acted before. All of that adds up to an engrossing piece of reality that is part character study and part road trip.  The screenplay is interesting and original and the cinematography beautiful, but I have to question the length of this film.  Two-and-a-half hours seems a bit indulgent.  I think the point could have been made in 90 minutes.

Shia LaBeouf is actually a very good actor, but the antics in his personal life have overshadowed his work, which is too bad, because here he creates a character that is at times brash and insensitive, other times tender and caring.

Sasha Lane had never acted before, which is amazing.  She is believable as Star, the girl who has nothing to lose, leaves her town and goes off on what appears to be a big adventure in hopes of finding something better.  Star has major attitude but also has a soft spot for children and animals.  It's a coming of age tale that would give parents the shudders.

Oh, and those magazine subscriptions I bought?  They were over-priced, but I actually DID get the magazines.

Rosy the Reviewer says...a fascinating look into a world few of us have ever been privy to...and we are lucky we haven't. 






Morgan (2016)


An artificially created humanoid begins to come unhinged.

Morgan (Anya Taylor-Joy, who I recognized as the star of another recent horror film "The Witch," which I reviewed last year) is a corporate experiment in creating a hybrid biological organism and injecting it with emotions and intellect.  (It was never really explained why we needed more humans). A team of people live in a remote, scary gothic house working with Morgan (why are these things always done in remote scary places)? The team consists of Amy (Rose Leslie), the behaviorist, Skip, the nutritionist (Boyd Holbrook), Kathy, one of the caregivers (Jennifer Jason Leigh in probably the smallest role she has ever had), Dr. Ziegler (Toby Jones), doctors Darren (Chris Sullivan) and Brenda Finch (Vinette Robinson), Dr. Cheng (Michelle Yeoh) and Ted (Michael Yare).  I never figured out what Ted's job was. 

Everything has been going swimmingly - Morgan is now five years old, though she is very definitely a teenager in looks and intellect - until there is an unfortunate incident where Morgan attacks Kathy. Morgan appears to have a bit of an anger problem, so now corporate has sent a risk management consultant, Lee Weathers (Kate Mara), to sort out what needs to be done. If Morgan is out of control, then she/he/it needs to be terminated.  But when Lee arrives, she sees that almost all of the team has formed an emotional bond with Morgan and are treating her as a human.  Amy, particularly, has crossed the boundaries and taken Morgan out of her enclosure and into the woods and to a lake to experience nature.  

As Dr. Cheng points out,  "Do you know the cruelest thing you can do to someone you've locked in a room? Press their face to the window."

Dr. Shapiro (Paul Giamatti) has also been sent by corporate to do an evaluation of Morgan and when he arrives to give Morgan a psychological evaluation, he makes her mad...and all hell breaks loose.

This scifi thriller with some gothic tinges was written by Seth W. Owen and directed by Luke Scott (son of Ridley). It seems to be a very similar plot to "Ex Machina," which I listed as one of the best films of 2015.  An outsider travels to a remote location to discover some strange human experimentation going on, finds a humanoid who is very human and gets caught up in the drama.  We are then required to ask ourselves, "What does it mean to be human? However, in this one, naturally, there is a twist on that theme, which naturally, I saw coming a mile away.  

But that aside, let's be frank.  This is a Lifetime Movie with A-list actors, but hey, I love Lifetime movies and this was a fun ride.

Mara does a good job as the unfeeling Lee Weathers who has come to do a job.  The rest of the cast is also fine - you will recognize Rose Leslie as Amy who was Jon Snow's love interest in "Game of Thrones" and Chris Sullivan from the hot new TV show "This is Us," one of the TV shows I listed recently as one of my favorite TV shows.

Then there is Paul Giamatti. You know how I feel about Paul Giamatti.  I have ranted about him ad infinitum.  He usually plays some kind of pompous ass and talks too loud.  He yells his lines. But actually, here, when he first arrived on screen, I hardly recognized him because his performance was so low key, but then he reverted to type and went over the top which not only caused Morgan to get angry, thus getting the ball rolling in the bloodshed that was to ensue, but made me give up on him entirely.

Rosy the Reviewer says...yet another entry in the film genre that could be called "How-To-Create-Humans-Other-Than-The-Natural-Way: A Cautionary Tale." But an entertaining movie, nevertheless, that reminds us: Don't mess with Mother Nature!





***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***


219 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?




Contempt (1963)


A marriage disintegrates during the making of a film.

Based on the novel "A Ghost at Noon" by Albert Moravia, the film opens with a long shot of Bridget Bardot's lovely naked backside.  In fact this entire film seems to be a love letter to Bardot's body.  She wasn't a major sex symbol for nothing.

Screenwriter Paul Javal (Michel Piccoli, who looked very much like Clive Owen - back then anyway) is working with producer Jeremy Prokosch (Jack Palance, on a screenplay, a version of Homer's "Odyssey," but he is at odds with Prokosch and director Fritz Lang (played by the real Lang). 

Prokosch is filming on the Isle of Capri and Javal and his wife Camille (Bardot) are also there. Their marriage is in trouble and Camille blames the troubles on Javal hanging out with movie people.  However, I blame the troubles in their marriage to Javal being a controlling type who is not averse to knocking his wife around and shopping her out to Prokosch who lusts after her so that he can get his movie made.  This film seems to be saying that selling one's soul to the devil seems to be a necessity in the movie business. It also seems to be saying that Bardot taking off her clothes at every opportunity is also a necessity.

Director Jean-Luc Godard uses the story of Odysseus and his wife Penelope as a theme for Paul and Camille's marriage as their marriage plays out against the backdrop of making a movie on the Isle of Capri amidst a plethora of Greek art and statues. 

Lang is German, Palance American and Javal and Camille French so there is a female interpreter present for most of the film interpreting dialogue for the characters, and I found it extremely annoying.  Perhaps it was a device to show the lack of communication amongst the characters, but it was annoying nevertheless.

Godard turns a caustic eye to the conflict between art and business and has created a cynical take on making movies and asks the question, "What is art?"  He literally beats you over the head with that question as he juxtaposes Greek sculpture into the film every 15 minutes or so. He also asks, "What is real life and what is make believe?  How much of what we see in the movies mirrors real life?"

As I make my way through the "1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die," I have come to realize that there was a lot of navel-gazing in some of the movies from the 50's and 60's, especially the French films.  Back then I must have enjoyed navel-gazing, because I and my friends were all agog at anything French and incomprehensible.  We didn't understand it?  It must have been deep.  But nowadays, I see that the emperor isn't wearing any clothes and those same films do not have the same impact on me now that they had on my young mind back then.  Now some of them make me..yawn.

Interestingly, the movie is filled with references to films and adorned with movie posters.  That was a similar device in "La La Land," which has currently taken the film world by storm, but that was the only similarity between the two films.  Where "La La Land" is a love letter to the movies, this film is mostly a love letter to Bridget Bardot's body and a poison pen letter to the movies. 

This is a beautiful film to look at and the story centers around a crumbling marriage played out on a gorgeous Mediterranean island.  It reminded me of "By the Sea (and we know how that marriage played out in real life)," but much of the movie was incomprehensible and the music was strangely out of sync to what was happening on screen.  Bardot also dons a short black wig from time to time which I am sure is symbolic of something but I never figured that out either.  But in general, in addition to the what is art stuff and the conflict between art and commerciality, I think this film is also how love can turn to contempt, which is a bit obvious, considering the title of the film.

I found it ironic that Godard is critical of the commercial side of art/movie-making but has no problem using Bardot's nudity in a gratuitous way at every turn - but then, maybe he was doing that to make a point.. Mmmm, deep.

Why it's a Must See: "A clever, elegant film with a shocking ending."
---"1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die"

Roger Ebert said: "Contempt'' is not one of the great Godard films...It is interesting to see, and has moments of brilliance...but its real importance is as a failed experiment. 'Contempt' taught Godard he could not make films like this, and so he included himself out, and went on to make the films he could make."

Rosy the Reviewer says...I agree with Roger, so why is this one of the "1001 Movies" I must see before I die?  But I will say, if you want to see Bardot sans vetements in all of her glory, then it might be worth it to you.



***The Book of the Week***





Nine Women, One Dress: A Novel by Jane L. Rosen



Who knew a LBD (Little Black Dress) could have such impact on peoples' lives?

"For seventy-five years I have made ladies' dresses.  That means that for seventy-five years I have made women happy...Because the right dress does that.  It makes an ordinary woman feel extraordinary...A beautiful dress holds a little bit of magic in it."

So says Morris Siegel, a 90-year-old pattern maker in New York City's garment center, who made "The Dress."  The dress in question was Morris's last dress before he retired, and it instantly became the "must-have" dress of the season. We meet him at the beginning of the book and at the end, after his dress has made its way to nine different women with nine different stories.

First there is Natalie, a Bloomingdale's salesgirl, who is having trouble getting over a nasty break-up and is called upon to wear the dress to a movie premiere with a movie star who is trying to show he isn't gay (he isn't but she thinks he is).  Then there is a Felicia, a 50-something secretary who has been in love with her boss for years but after his wife died, he has taken up with a much younger woman...until he sees Felicia in "the dress."  And then we meet Andie, a private investigator, who is hired to catch a woman's husband cheating...until she falls for the husband. 

Those are the three main storylines.

But the dress also makes its way to a young model fresh from the South who makes a splash in New York because everyone falls in love with her accent (think Margaux Hemingway); a not-very-nice Hollywood diva making her debut on Broadway; a recent Brown graduate who is embarrassed that she can't find a job so fakes a #fabulouslife online; a sheltered young Muslim girl yearning to wear clothes like in the magazines instead of a burqa; a woman who ends up dead in a sinkhole after leaving Bloomies; and Samantha, whose boyfriend works in a funeral home and who ends up in the ER with a rash from formaldehyde.  I will let you figure that one out.  The dress has a part in each of these lives.

And ladies, don't you have a favorite item that makes you feel fantastic and that can tell a story?  Whether we like it or not, what we wear defines us in many ways and clothes have the power to make our story wonderful or lousy.

I know. 

This isn't Tolstoy or Dostoevsky. This is a quick read and chick lit of the highest order, but there is nothing wrong with spending a dreary, cold afternoon with some interesting characters, some romantic stories and the perfect little black dress.

Rosy the Reviewer says...this would make a great movie in the tradition of "The Yellow Rolls Royce," except it's an LBD (Little Black Dress) that gets passed around instead of a BYRR (Big Yellow Rolls Royce).

 
 
 
 
Thanks for reading!

 
See you next Friday 

 
for my review of


"Live By Night"

and


The Week in Reviews
(What to See or Read and What to Avoid)


 and the latest on



"My 1001 Movies I Must See Before 

 I Die Project." 


If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rosythereviewer


Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.


Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 

Go to IMDB.com, find the movie you are interested in.  Once there, click on the link that says "Explore More" on the right side of the screen.  Scroll down to External Reviews and when you get to that page, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.

NOTE:  On some entries, this has changed.  If you don't see "Explore More" on the right side of the screen, scroll down just below the description of the film in the middle of the page. Click where it says "Critics." Look for "Rosy the Reviewer" on the list.

Or if you are using a mobile device, look for "Critics Reviews." Click on that and you will find me alphabetically under "Rosy the Reviewer."


Friday, October 7, 2016

"The Magnificent Seven" and The Week in Reviews

[I review the new movie "The Magnificent Seven" as well as DVDs "Genius" and "10 Cloverfield Lane."  The Book of the Week is "The Girl on the Train."  I also bring you up-to-date with "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project" with "The Phenix City Story."]




The Magnificent Seven


Bartholomew Bogue and his henchman have taken over the small mining town of Rose Creek, robbing it of its resources and enslaving the locals, killing anyone who questions his authority.  A plucky woman whose husband was killed by the bad guys travels to another town to get help and manages to find seven gunman to help her reclaim her town.

Chris Chisholm (Denzel Washington) is a warrant officer (which I think is a fancy name for a bounty hunter) out looking for criminals when he comes across Emma Cullen (Haley Bennett).  In the cold opening of the film we have already seen her husband get killed by the evil Bartholomew Bogue (Peter Sarsgaard) and his henchmen who have taken over the town.  Emma is looking for help to get her town back and she engages Chris who in turn finds six other men to help her. All having their reasons for getting involved, they return to the town and prepare the townspeople and themselves to take on Bogue and his men.  It looks like an impossible task but you know how these kinds of movies go, right?

This is a remake of a remake.  The first remake was the 1960 film of the same name which turned Kurasawa's original Samurai warrior film "The Seven Samurai" into a western.  If you read my reviews regularly you know how I feel about remakes, so I won't get into that whole thing again.  Let's just say I don't like remakes and since this is not only a remake, but a remake of a remake, you would think that I really wouldn't like it.  But you would be wrong. 

Though there are similarities between the 2016 version and the 1960 version of this film, most notably that they are both westerns with all-star casts, the actual plot is a bit different. Both the original film and the 1960 remake involved bandits robbing and pillaging the town whenever they felt the need.  In this latest version, there is a resident pillager, Bogue, who is terrorizing and exploiting the townfolk and the local farmers. The 1960 film had a romance, this one doesn't, and there certainly were no African Americans or Native Americans as part of the "Seven" in the 1960 remake.  However, the pyrrhic victory remains the same.

As in most westerns/war movies/etc. that involve a group of guys, there is always a mix of personalities and everyone comes with some baggage.  In that way, the two films remain the same with some slight variations on the characters, though despite Chris Pratt and Denzel, for its day, the 1960 film had more big names.

If you were a fan of the 1960 version, you will remember that badass Yul Brynner played the head gunslinger Chris Adams.  Now badass Denzel Washington leads the "Seven" as warrant officer Sam Chisholm; Steve McQueen's failed gambler Vin Tanner is replaced by character Chris Pratt's Josh Faraday, though Josh also likes to do card tricks and blow things up; Bernardo O'Reilly (Charles Bronson), a gunfighter of Irish-Mexican heritage in the original remake, is comparable to the new film's Mexican outlaw Vasquez (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo) and Britt (James Coburn), the knife expert is now an Asian character, Billy Rocks (Byung-hun Lee).  And every group has to have a coward - Ethan Hawke plays Goodnight Robicheaux who is having a crisis of confidence just as Lee (Robert Vaughn) did in the 1960 version. A couple of new characters are an almost unrecognizable Vincent D'Onofrio as the mountain man Jack Horne and Martin Sensmeier as the Native American warrior Red Harvest. This latest remake had no comparable character for the hotheaded, inexperienced but very hot and handsome Chico (Horst Buchholz), who provided a love interest in the 1960 film.  No romance in this new one.

So the characters are similar and so is the plot.  So why redo this already classic redo?

I would guess part of the reason could be the dearth of westerns these days, and it's a classic story of good versus evil and fighting for what's right even if the odds are against you.  Plus the studios were probably looking for something that would highlight Chris Pratt who is really hot right now.

I am not much of a western fan.  I think it's because there were just so many of them on TV when I was growing up.  I was more of a sitcom girl (remember "Bachelor Father" and "Ozzie and Harriet?").  My Dad was a western fan so I got my fill of "Gunsmoke" and "Have Gun Will Travel" and "Wanted Dead or Alive."  TV was awash in westerns in the 1950's and 60's.


But I have to say this is an exciting, well-acted story and I enjoyed it.

Haley Bennett plays our plucky heroine, and though I liked that she got right in there with the men fighting off the bad guys, I couldn't get over the fact that every costume she wore had some decolletage or was off the shoulder or showed some cleavage. Not very practical outfits for clomping around in the dirt, riding a horse or shooting a rifle. We didn't have any romance in this film, but we certainly had some cheesecake.

Chris Pratt has pretty much perfected the smirking smart ass character and here he is again.  Denzel is his usual wonderful steady steely badass self and Ethan Hawke is poignant as the troubled ex-Confederate officer Robicheaux. Peter Saarsgard is expert at playing reptilian types and and this part is no exception.

The cinematography is beautiful and, at the end of the film, you are even treated to a little of the iconic instantly recognizable "Magnificent Seven" theme music by Elmer Bernstein made famous in the 1960 film.

Here is a little treat for you while you read the rest of my reviews!
You are very welcome!



Directed by Antoine Fuqua, who has worked with Denzel on "Training Day" and "The Equalizer," with a script by Richard Wenk and Nic Pizzolatto, this film is beautiful to look at and is a welcome addition to the western movie genre in a world where we see few westerns anymore.

Rosy the Reviewer says...if you like westerns and shoot 'em ups, you will enjoy this. 





***Some Movies You Might Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)!

Now on DVD






Genius (2016)


A biopic of reknowned book editor Maxwell Perkins who guided the work of Thomas Wolfe, F.Scott Fitzgerald and Hemingway while working at Scribners in the 1920's.

You might say, Maxwell who?  Literary films are few and far between these days and when they do occur they often don't do well at the box office.  Not sure what that says about us and our penchant for reading, or lack thereof (see how literary I am using big words)?  So it's strange to see this little film about a man few know today played by one of our most well-known actors, Colin Firth

Though Perkins worked with Fitzgerald and Hemingway and other writers, this film focuses on his relationship with Thomas Wolfe (Jude Law) from the publication of Wolfe's first novel "Look Homeward Angel" to "Time and the River." Wolfe is portrayed as a bit of a nut job and has a relationship with Aline Bernstein (Nicole Kidman), who is also kind of a nut job.  She is not particularly happy about Thomas's success since it cuts into her time with him. You see, she is older and bit insecure about that.

But it's the relationship between Perkins and Wolfe that is the interesting one.  They both influenced the other. Tom's freewheeling lifestyle loosened Max up, and Max was able to calm Tom's writing style down.  You see, Tom has absolutely no problem whipping out a 5000 page manuscript and doesn't want to cut a word of it. Tom is single-minded about his work and it dawns on Max that he too is the same.  Even though there are wives and lovers, this film is about the relationship between Max and Tom and explores the psyches of these two men.  Where Tom's ego was big enough that he thought every word of a 5000 page book was worth keeping, Max was wracked with doubt that his editing made the book better. The movie also explores the question: since Wolfe couldn't edit himself how much of his success was because of Perkins?

Perkins was never a writer himself but he understood writers and what made a good book.  Working with Wolfe was a challenge because Wolfe was so prolific and, er, wordy?  He could knock off a 5000 page book - no problem.  Perkins had to make it readable.  Wolfe was in love with his own words and Perkins was able to get him to hone the book down into a readable one. So who was the genius here?  Wolfe or Perkins?

Perkins lived a seemingly normal life at home in Connecticut with his wife, played by Laura Linney (what has happened to her career?  She seems to play nothing but wives of famous men these days e.g. "Sully") and their five daughters, but when he would go to work in NYC he would be surrounded by literary geniuses, mostly men. 

Perkins was a father figure for Wolfe and his other authors.  There are appearances by Fitzgerald (Guy Pearce), who has to deal with his wife Zelda and his career on the downswing and Hemingway (Dominic West) whose confidence is in contrast to Fitzgerald's lack of it. Perkins was as much father confessor as editor. He was a bit of a father figure to his authors and, with five daughters, they in turn were his "sons."

Jude Law, who was once a great heartthrob and who we don't see that much anymore, does a good job showing Wolfe as a character who was complicated and "so full of life" that after he died (he died young at the age of 38) "there was a great void."  But I found the character annoying. If that was how Wolfe really was, I don't know how Perkins put up with him.  People who are "full of life" can also be a pain in the butt. Nicole Kidman as Aline is also annoying but she is supposed to be and does a very good job of being annoying.

But it's Firth, with Perkins' ever present fedora, who carries the film.  His quiet elegance and patience comes through and he is able to convey Perkins' love for Wolfe, who was probably the son he never had and why he put up with him.

Directed by Michael Grandage with a screenplay by John Logan (based on the book "Max Perkins, Editor of Genius" by A. Scott Berg), one can't help but wonder how this little film ever got made and with such big names.  It was probably in the theatres for about a minute.  But we need these kinds of films and we need to remember the great authors.

Rosy the Reviewer says...an interesting exploration of a time of great literary expression and the man who made it all happen. Now go read a book!





10 Cloverfield Lane (2016)


A woman escaping her past gets into a car accident and when she wakes up finds herself in a bunker with two men who say there has been an apocalyptic chemical attack.

Mary Elizabeth Winstead plays Michelle, who has left her boyfriend, Ben, and is fleeing in the dead of night.  Few people are around and out of nowhere she is struck by a truck.  When she wakes up she finds herself chained to a bed in a room with an IV in her arm.  She sees her cell phone a few feet away, so she rips out her IV and gets to her phone and wouldn't you know?  The bane of cell phone users existence!  NO SERVICE.

But she isn't going to lie around waiting to find out why she is a captive.  She decides to be proactive. She fashions a knife out of her crutch and then starts a fire in the air vent.  When her seeming captor finally comes into the room she attacks him but he overcomes her and sedates her once again.  When she comes to again, we finally find out that her captor is Howard (John Goodman) and he has saved her from "the attack." He's not sure if it was chemical or nuclear. She soon learns that she is not alone in the bunker with Howard.  There is another person there as well, Emmett (John Gallagher Jr.), a young guy we don't know much about. He eventually shares with Michelle that he's not a smart guy and gave up his sports scholarship to go to college because he feared the smarter kids.  We also learn that Howard is a survivalist and conspiracy theorist.

Howard, Michelle and Emmett are all together in an uneasy alliance.  Howard states the rules:  use coasters on the table because it's an heirloom, put the DVDs and tapes back in their sleeves and no touching. The three settle into a routine of playing games, watching videos.

But little things start happening that make Michelle feel like Howard is not telling the truth about the attack. Michelle starts to remember the accident and suspects that Howard was the one who hit her.  What if he did it on purpose?

One day the air filtration system fails so Howard has Michelle crawl into the duct system to restart it.  While in the space where the filtration system is, she sees a ladder leading up to a skylight.  She can't resist crawling up there and when she gets to the top, she sees the word "Help" scrawled into the glass.  She also finds an earring and a picture of a girl that Emmett recognizes as a girl from his high school who went missing.

Michelle starts working on Emmett to form an alliance against Howard so they can escape and one hour and fifteen minutes into the film there is a big twist.

So the whole crux of this film is this:  is Howard telling the truth - has there been an apocalypse - or is he a perv who has abducted her? 

This is a three-hander, meaning for almost all of the film it's just the three characters, but the film also seems to want to make a metaphor out of Michelle's distrust of Howard and her need to escape from the confines of the bunker, no matter what. Michelle has always run away. Michelle shares with Emmett that she had an abusive childhood and there was an incident where she could have helped a little girl who was also being abused.  But she didn't and she ran away. She has just run away from her boyfriend and is now also trying to run away. Mmmm.

John Goodman started out as the jovial kindly father on "Rosanne" and has matured into character roles, some sidekicks and supporting roles, but lately, more and more sinister types.  I haven't decided if Goodman is a good dramatic actor or not. I will keep you posted.  But Winstead and Gallagher are wonderful young actors.  Winstead has starred in the TV shows "Mercy Street" and "BrainDead" and will be starring in the third season of "Fargo," premiering in 2017.  I think we will also see more of her in feature films. Gallagher also hails from TV shows - "The Newsroom" and the award-winning "Olive Kitteridge" mini-series.

Directed by Dan Trachtenberg, produced by J.J. Abrams of "Star Wars" fame (he also produced the first "Cloverfield") and with a script by Josh Campbell, Matthew Steucken and Damien Chazelle, this film does not have much in common with the first one, except the name, though there was a bit of a tease at the end.  Was it related to the first film?  Not sure.  But this one is not directly related (I don't think), which was a sort of disappointment because I found the first film to be a fresh, original and creepy horror film. However, there are rumors that the name "Cloverfield" is going to become a sort of "Twilight Zone" type of franchise. And who knows?  Maybe there will be others and they will all come together and be related somehow.  In the meantime, this one stands on its own as a creepy little film perfect for a dark and rainy day.


Rosy the Reviewer says...if you are expecting this to be a sequel to "Cloverfield," you will be disappointed, but despite an ending that is a bit much, it doesn't lack for intensity and thrills.


 
 

***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***

232 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?





The Phenix City Story (1955)


Based on a true story, father and son attorneys take on the crime syndicate that has been running their town for 100 years and turned it into Sin City USA.

The film starts with a cold opening of "breaking news," where a reporter is seen interviewing the townspeople about the aftermath of a murder of a nominee for State Attorney General.  The murder has been the catalyst for busting a crime syndicate that had been running the town. The reporter refers to Phenix City rising from the ashes - the name of the city itself being a rather blatant metaphor - but  it's not just a metaphor, it's a real city in Alabama.

After the opening credits, the film flashes back to a dramatic reenactment of a true 1955 story and about how the syndicate was brought down.

Local attorney Albert L. Patterson (John McIntire) is an honest attorney but has turned a blind eye to the corruption in his city, because what can he do?  It's been this way for 100 years.  We know things are bad in Phenix City because we have a sultry singer, a smoked filled room, gambling, jazz and sinister looking guys wearing fedoras. But when Albert's son (Richard Kiley), who is also an attorney, returns from the war, he gets his Dad fired up and they decide to try to make some changes.  But when Albert decides that to make those changes he must run for the State's Attorney General position and get people to vote, the mob, run by good old boy Rhett Tanner (Edward Andrews), is not happy and comes down on him hard. 


I sometimes scratch my had at some of these "1001 movies" I am supposed to see before I die.  Some just don't stand the test of time, in my opinion.  To stand the test of time, the film must have natural acting or at least some innovation that lead to other films following suit.  It must say something significant and the story must be universal to appeal to everyone.

Did this one meet the standard?

Why it's a Must See: "Although its graphic violence was virtually unprecedented in Hollywood, what makes this low-budget shocker truly innovative is its recognition that new content calls for new form. [This film] is a purposely ugly movie, full of ugly rednecks, ugly juke joints, ugly camera angles...Many movies since have portrayed more explicit and elaborate violence, but few have conveyed violence's chaotic force with such intelligent crudeness."
---"1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die"

Let's just say it grew on me.  The acting was a bit over-the-top at times and you might be distracted by the 1950's cars, clothes and clichés, but as the film went on, I was amazed at the brutality and the message is an important one. Get out and vote!

Director Phil Karlson, went on to direct the TV movie "The Scarface Mob" in 1959 which led to "The Untouchables" TV show.

McIntyre, Kiley and Andrews are all faces you will recognize though you might not have known their names and they are journeymen actors who can be counted on to give great performances.  And they do.

Rosy the Reviewer says...if you like films like "On the Waterfront" and "All The King's Men," you might like this film.  And the message is clear. Be sure to vote!



 
***Book of the Week***





The Girl on the Train by Paula Hawkins (2016)


A woman trying to recover from a bad breakup drinks too much and has blackouts, and as she commutes on the train, fantasizes about the people she sees from her train window until one day she is pulled into a real life murder.

Rachel is in bad shape. She is divorced and getting drunk every day.  And every day she takes the commuter train from the suburbs into London and every day she passes the house where she used to happily live with her husband.  She also watches the couple who lives a few doors down from where she used to live.  She has named them Jess and Jason and fantasizes about the happy life they are leading, a life she once had before her husband cheated and left her for another woman who he married and now lives with in their old house.  And to make matters even worse they have a baby together, something Rachel was never able to do and which started her drinking. 

But one day she hears about a murder and it's Jess.  Except her name isn't Jess.  It's Megan, and Rachel realizes she saw something shocking one day from the train that could help the investigation.  However, when she goes to the police, she is considered an unreliable witness.  Is she?  Has her drinking made her hallucinate?  Rachel tries to untangle what's in her head and finds herself tangled up in a complicated story.

Told from three different points of view - Rachel's, Megan's and Anna's (Anna is the woman Rachel's husband married) - we find out just how bad Rachel's life has become since she split from her husband.  She is drunk A LOT. She wakes up many mornings and can't remember what happened the night before. Each woman gives her perspective as the story unfolds.

Hawkins has a gift for dialogue and makes each woman come alive off of the page.  She uses an effective device for telling her story.  Each chapter has a date and is divided into "morning" "afternoon" and "evening." She starts by introducing Rachel in real time and then goes back a few months to introduce Megan and Anna and as the book goes on, the dates catch up with each other as the three women's lives mesh.  It's a fantastic device that makes the book read like you are watching a movie. 

Speaking of movies, the movie version of this book opens TODAY, October 7th, 2016.  I can't wait to see it!





Rosy the Reviewer says...Before you see the film, read the book.  From the very first page you will be pulled in and will not be able to stop reading, and no matter what you think of the movie, you will always have that great read!  However, after reading you will probably think you should stop drinking!




That's it for this week!
 

Thanks for reading!



See you next Friday 
 

for my review of


"The Dressmaker"


 and 

  

The Week in Reviews

(What to See or Read and What to Avoid)


 

and the latest on



"My 1001 Movies I Must See Before  

 I Die Project." 

 

 
If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rosythereviewer


Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.

 

Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 

Go to IMDB.com, find the movie you are interested in.  Once there, click on the link that says "Explore More" on the right side of the screen.  Scroll down to External Reviews and when you get to that page, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.

NOTE:  On some entries, this has changed.  If you don't see "Explore More" on the right side of the screen, scroll down just below the description of the film in the middle of the page. Click where it says "Critics." Look for "Rosy the Reviewer" on the list.

Or if you are using a mobile device, look for "Critics Reviews." Click on that and you will find me alphabetically under "Rosy the Reviewer."