Friday, November 30, 2018

"Green Book" and The Week in Reviews

[I review the movie "Green Book" as well as "The Christmas Chronicles," now streaming on Netflix.  The Book of the week is Sir Michael Caine's memoir "Blowing the Bloody Doors Off."  I also bring you up-to-date with "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project" with "Vampyr."]

Green Book

A rough and tumble Italian-American bouncer is hired to drive an African-American classical pianist to his gigs in a Jim Crow era South.

It's 1962 and Tony Vallelonga (AKA Tony Lip and played by Viggo Mortensen), is an Italian American living in the Bronx, on hiatus from his job as a bouncer at the Copacabana nightclub while it undergoes renovations.  But like any working class guy with a family, he's got to pay the bills so he takes on a two-month job driving Dr. Don Shirley (Mahershala Ali) to his concerts.  

Dr. Shirley is a renowned, classically trained pianist and the centerpiece of the Don Shirley Trio, and he travels the country playing at posh events to mostly white audiences.  However, when Tony meets Shirley for his interview, the divide between the two is clear.  Tony lives in a working class neighborhood; Shirley lives over Carnegie Hall in a posh apartment complete with throne which Shirley sits in while interviewing Tony. Where Dr. Shirley is refined, educated and elegant, Tony is rough, boorish and has a prodigious appetite (to earn a few bucks he takes on Fat Paulie (Johnny Williams) in a hot dog eating contest and beats him)! Tony is also a racist.  When Tony's wife, Delores (played by a wonderfully real and warm Linda Cardellini), offers two black repairmen a drink of water, after they leave, Tony throws the glasses into the garbage.

But as Maya Angelou once said, "When you know better, you do better." 

But it still takes Tony awhile. When Tony and Dr. Shirley begin their road trip, Tony regales Shirley with all of the stereotypes attributed to African Americans.  For example, Shirley must love fried chicken, right?  Wrong.  He has never tried it. Tony is unabashedly himself: lacking in manners, subtlety or political correctness, whereas Shirley is the epitome of the gentleman and, naturally, he doesn't approve of Tony. But Shirley is also uptight and lonely. 

See where this is going?

As this road trip/buddy film progresses and Tony experiences the racism that Dr. Shirley faces and Shirley comes to realize that Tony, despite his crudeness, is a good person, their feelings change about each other and a bond is forged between the two. 

This film, based on a true story, is a bit like a reverse "Driving Miss Daisy." And yes, there are some cliches and plot devices you can see coming from a mile away, but this film is so beautifully done and the actors so real and open, none of that will matter.  You will be transported on this journey with them and love every minute of it.

If you saw Mahershala Ali in "Moonlight" you won't recognize him in this. And if you saw Viggo in practically anything else he has every done, you won't recognize him either. And that's good because that means these two are wonderful actors and have created characters you have not seen them do before. The two together have an unforgettable chemistry and you won't be able to take your eyes off either of them.

This is the directorial debut of Peter Farrelly, one half of the Farrelly Brothers, who brought us the funny but rather low-brow "There's Something About Mary" and the "Dumb and Dumber" films, but there is nothing low-brow or dumb about this film.  

Though this film has some of the humor of those earlier films, there is a lot more than that going on here.

For one thing, it's a statement about white privilege.  Dr. Shirley can be the star of the night, wowing the white elite with his piano playing.  He can be erudite, refined, dressed in a tuxedo and still be refused service in the very restaurant where he was the main attraction and, afterwards, be relegated to seedy hotels when the night is over while Tony is welcomed with open arms everywhere no matter how he acts or how he is dressed just on the basis of his whiteness.  Over and over we witness Shirley's humiliations in this film. But when Tony witnesses it first hand, it changes him. 

When I see films like this and am reminded of the cruelty a race of people has endured based on the color of their skin, I get so angry and I am getting angrier and angrier because it seems that even today nothing has changed.  But at least this film gives us a glimmer of hope. We see that people can change, one encounter at a time.

The film is also about family, identity, prejudice (and not just against black people), the Jim Crow South and the threat of being gay in the bad old days, but though the film has that serious side, the film is also funny and carries you along on this journey where two very different people from very different backgrounds form a special and lifelong friendship. The film was written by Farrelly, Brian Hayes Curry and Nick Vallelonga, Tony's real life son, who has had a long career as an actor, director and producer.

My only complaint about this film is what I consider an unfortunate title.  

And that's only because I think the title might keep people from seeing this wonderful film. Though it's integral to the plot (a Green Book was a guidebook to help those "traveling while black" to avoid inherent dangers, listing restaurants and hotels that would take black people), few people probably know what a Green Book was and it doesn't really describe the film.  I worry that people won't go see this film because of the title and that would be a shame because it's one of the best films of the year.  And it's even sort of about Christmas. This might turn out to be your new favorite Christmas movie.

Rosy the Reviewer says...ring...ring...Oscar calling!

***Some Movies You Might Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)!

Streaming on Netflix

The Christmas Chronicles (2018)

Brother and sister, Kate and Teddy Pierce, spend a magical Christmas Eve!

It wouldn't be the holidays if I didn't include some holiday films, right?  I mean, enough already with the terrorists and the vampire movie I am going to review next and all of the daily bad news.  We need to BELIEVE!

And that's what this movie is all about.

The Pierce family living in Lowell, Massachusetts, loves Christmas as we see from a montage of home videos spanning 2006 to 2017.  First little Teddy is the centerpiece but then a couple of years later the family is joined by his little sister, Kate.  But now it's 2018 and things don't look good for Teddy and Kate.  The tree hasn't been decorated, the house is a mess and the kids aren't happy. We soon figure out that Dad, Doug, has died and Christmas isn't going to be what it once was (Doug is played by Oliver Hudson - he is Goldie Hawn's son and Goldie has famously been in a very long term relationship with Kurt Russell, who plays Santa, so this film is a family affair!

Naturally when it comes to Santa, teenager Teddy (Judah Lewis) is a non-believer but young Kate (Darby Camp) still believes and sends Santa a video letter. She is an intrepid and curious young girl who, when following her brother with the video camera, catches him out stealing a car with his thuggy friends. She video tapes it. Not a good start to the Christmas season.  Worse, Mom, Claire (Kimberly Williams-Paisley) has to work on Christmas Eve, leaving Teddy and Kate to fend for themselves. Clearly things aren't the same since Dad died and basically things have gone to hell.

Directed by Clay Kaytis, this is one of those "Is there really a Santa?/and Someone needs to save Christmas" movies like "Miracle on 34th Street," "White Christmas" and countless others.  Here when Santa gets put in jail, it's up to Teddy and Kate to do just that - save Christmas. Oh, and, of course, we need to get Teddy to become a believer.

This is how it all shakes out.

Mom gets called into work on Christmas Eve.  She needs to work because she has to support her family so she tells Teddy to look after his sister and off she goes. Teddy goes off to his room and Kate amuses herself by looking at old family Christmas videos.  All of a sudden she sees something in one of the videos.  It's a red arm with fur around the wrist and it's holding a present.  What?  Could that be Santa?  Kate calls Teddy down to see it and, then Kate hatches a plan.  Let's stay up and video Santa in the act! Though Teddy is skeptical, he agrees to Kate's plan when she offers to give him the video she made of him stealing that car.

So they set up the cameras and some booby traps to alert them to Santa's arrival, stuff themselves with junk food and fall asleep.

Soon, Kate hears the jingle jingle of one of the booby traps and, then, footsteps on the roof!  Santa!

Kate and Teddy run outside and see Santa's reindeer and sleigh and a figure leaping from house to house.  Kate climbs into the sleigh, Teddy follows and before they know it they are flying off with Santa who doesn't know they are there.  But when he realizes he isn't alone, he is so shocked that the sleigh crashes, Santa loses his hat (the hat allows him to fly) and the reindeer and sleigh fly off.

There the three are - Santa, Teddy and Kate - lying in a park in Chicago and no way for Santa to deliver the rest of his packages. According to Santa the Christmas Spirit is fading fast. What will happen if he can't make his rounds? Well, according to Santa, the last time that happened the Dark Ages descended!  So someone has to save Christmas!

So what do you do when you need to get into Chicago to find your reindeer and deliver packages?  Why you steal a Dodge Charger and speed into town but when they get caught by the police and Santa goes to jail, it's up to Teddy and Kate to save Christmas.

This film has an abundance of Christmas movie tropes with some "Adventures in Babysitting" thrown in:

  • Cutesy and plucky kids
  • Even cuter reindeer
  • A wise-cracking Santa
  • Elves
  • Pratfalls
  • Car chases
  • Bad guys who try to thwart our hero
  • Lots of heart string tugging AKA schmaltz
  • And a message

Of course we know that Christmas will be saved and non-believers will be believers.  I mean, who hasn't seen the aforementioned "Miracle on 34th Street" and all of the Christmas clones since then?  But even though we know how it will end, it's the journey that will decide the success of the film.  Is the journey to that known ending worth the ride?

Yes and no.

Kurt Russell is a fun Santa (he actually gets to rock out and sing with Little Steven and The Disciples of Soul); I actually liked the kids (and you know how I feel about precocious children in films); someone makes a surprise cameo appearance as Mrs. Claus (remember, I said it was a family affair!); and the film moves along at a rapid pace  There is also a good message: You don't need to just believe in Santa, you need to believe in yourself. But ultimately, I think it will appeal mostly to young children.  For older folks, it's a bit silly, though I have to say, I loved the reindeer.

Rosy the Reviewer for little kids but if you are a Kurt Russell fan, you might enjoy this.  For us older folks?  I, for one, am not adding this to my Christmas movie repertoire. I'm sticking with the classics!  

***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***

117 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?

Vampyr (1932)

Allen Gray (Julian West) is obsessed with the supernatural so what a coincidence that he ends up in a creepy town where a young girl is turning into a vampire.

Note:  I know this isn't very Christmasy but holiday season or not, I must continue with my 1001 Movies Project!

This is one of those early films that was somewhere in between a silent film and a talkie.  The film still utilized intertitles (printed words on the screen), but there was also audible dialogue, though not often synchronized with the characters, mostly voice overs.

Allen Gray is a bit of a drifter who studies the supernatural.  While wandering around (we don't know why or where he has come from), he encounters an inn where he gets a room.  In the middle of the night he is awakened by an elderly man (again, we don't know why or where this guy has come from either) who proclaims "The girl musn't die" and leaves a parcel labeled, "To be opened in the event of my death."  Later Gray wanders over to a house (this guy likes to wander) and discovers that the old man's daughter, Leone (Sybille Schmitz) is suffering from some strange anemia (uh, she has a bite on her neck!) and then the man is murdered so Allen opens the package, discovers a book about vampires and all hell breaks loose.

Directed by Carl Theodor Dreyer, this film was considered to be one of the greatest of all horror films.  If by horror they mean creepy, OK, then this is horror but it wouldn't stand as anything very scary today.  However, it's loaded with atmosphere and the later Dracula films are written all over it. There is also an amazing sequence where Gray imagines his own death.

West is a strange hero in that he doesn't seem to be too upset or amazed by the strange scenes he encounters.  This is probably because Gray is played by Julian West who was not an actor but the Baron Nicolas de Gunzburg who agreed to finance the film if he could star in it.

The cinematography is dreamy and gauzy. I was wondering why it was so fuzzy only to learn that the photography was achieved by placing a gauze filter over the camera lens to achieve a dreamlike state.

In fact, the whole film is very much like a dream, a very bad dream.

Why it's a Must See: "The greatness of Carl Theodor Dreyer's first sound film derives partly from its handling of the vampire theme in terms of sexuality and eroticism, and partly from its highly distinctive, dreamy look...If you've never seen a Dreyer film and wonder why many critics regard him as possibly the greatest of all filmmakers, this chilling horror fantasy is the perfect place to begin to understand."
---"1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die"

Rosy the Reviewer says...I guess I understand, but though this film is very dreamy and beautiful to look at, haunting even, if you are a fan of modern horror this probably wouldn't scare you too much.
(In German with English subtitles and intertitles)

***The Book of the Week***

Blowing the Bloody Doors Off: And Other Lessons in Life by Michael Caine (2018)

Sir Michael Caine catches us up on his amazing life and shares what he has learned about acting and about life.

I remember when I first saw Michael Caine.  It was when he starred in the 1966 film "Alfie," and I remember thinking, what a strange looking leading man (I was precocious for a teen).  And his acting style was so underplayed and his Cockney accent so thick,  I didn't get him at first.  But by the time the film was over, I was hooked and I have been a Michael Caine fan ever since.

This is not his first memoir and he has also written a wonderful book about acting in films.  This one is both and more.  It's a primer for students of acting (how not to look shifty on camera, if you aren't Marilyn Monroe or Elizabeth Taylor, don't keep people waiting, the importance of preparation and other important tips), but it's also a self-help book for the rest of us.  He talks about how to be a successful working actor and then applies those principles to life.  And for those of you who like dishy celebrity memoirs, don't despair. There are also plenty of fun anecdotes about Caine's 50+ year career.  At 85, Caine has much to share and it's inspiring stuff.

"I wanted to look back on my life from the Elephant and Castle to Hollywood, and from man-about-town Alfie to Batman's butler Alfred, with all its successes and all its failures, all its fun and all its misery and struggle, its comedy, its drama, its romance and its tragedy, and find, among it all, the lessons I've learnt and want to share, not just for aspiring movie actors but for everyone."

And here are some of his lessons:

  • "You are always auditioning"
Just a reminder to be nice. Remember that old saying that goes something like, "Be nice to people on the way up because you may meet them on the way down?" He illustrates that beautifully with a story about being on a film set before he hit it big.  In those days, a bus would bring tourists through and they were allowed to get out and mingle with the actors during filming and get autographs.  However, the actors didn't like that and would usually hightail it out of there when the bus arrived.  Caine talks about one particular bus driver who was a go-getter and very adept at arriving at key times so his passengers could try to meet as many actors as possible.  One day after most of the actors had taken off, Caine decided to make the bus driver look good and stay and sign autographs.  That bus driver was Michael Ovitz who...wait for it...became President of the Disney Company.

  • "Use the difficulty"
Basically he believes when life hands you lemons, make lemonade.

  • "Whatever it is, give it 100 per cent"
We've heard that before but I like how he explains it. Even if you have a bit part in a movie or a "bit part" in your chosen profession, he says, "It's the small-time experience that adds up to the big-time ability...your part may not be the most important part in the movie, but it is the most important thing to you...The same goes whatever you're doing, in whatever walk of life. However scaled down your role is, do not make that a reason to scale down your effort."

Many of his lessons just seem like common sense, but if they are so common and make so much sense, why aren't we all doing these things?  The book is a great reminder to be our best selves.

There is a reason Michael Caine has had such a long and successful career.  He follows his own advice and people want to work with him. And he is a popular actor with audiences.  We like Michael Caine.  And this book is the evidence.  He's just a really good guy who has learned a lot in his 85 years and we are fortunate that he is sharing what he has learned in this witty, self-deprecating and charming book.

Rosy the Reviewer says...I enjoyed every minute of my time with Sir Michael!

Thanks for reading!

   See you next Friday 


"Boy Erased"


The Week in Reviews
(What To See and What To Avoid)


the latest on

"My 1001 Movies I Must See

Before I Die Project" 

If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at

Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.

Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 

Go to, find the movie you are interested in.  Scroll down below the synopsis and the listings for the director, writer and main stars to where it says "Reviews" and click on "Critics" - If I have reviewed that film, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.

Friday, November 23, 2018

"Widows" and The Week in Reviews

[I review "Widows" as well as the DVD "Bel Canto."  The Book of the Week is Tina Turner's memoir "My Love Story."  I also bring you up-to-date with "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project" with "Things to Come."]


Veronica (Viola Davis), Linda (Gina Rodriguez), Alice (Elizabeth Debicki) and Amanda (Carrie Coon) are living their regular lives not realizing they will all not only soon be widows but will be involved with each other in a way they could never have imagined.

Veronica Rawlings is married to Harry (Liam Neeson) and it appears they have a loving relationship.  How do I know this?  Because at the beginning of this film we see them in bed in their high class Chicago high rise doing a huge amount of French kissing in bed.  Not being a big fan of watching open-mouthed French kissing in movies, I kind of thought "ew," but OK, I get it. They are in love.

However, Linda, Alice and Amanda don't live quite the high life that Veronica lives. Linda is a hard-working mother who looks after her husband, Carlos (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo), and her mother-in-law doesn't approve of her; Amanda has a new baby, and we mothers know how that is; and Alice's husband likes to give her a whack from time to time.

Oh, and in case you might wonder what these women have in common...their husbands are all criminals. 

Early in the film, all four husbands are involved in a heist gone wrong and all are killed in a fiery explosion after a police chase. This is not a spoiler. Thus the title of our film - "Widows." Duh.  So in a short period of time, the film becomes all about the ladies - mostly - except for some very nasty guys and some rotten politics swirling around.

For example, Jamal Manning (Brian Tyree Henry) is a bad guy running for alderman against Jack Mulligan (Colin Farrell), the son of another very bad guy (Robert Duvall).  It may be politics but it might as well be a turf war.  It turns out that Harry, you know, Veronica's husband, and his guys robbed Jamal and now, even though Harry is dead, Jamal and his very, very nasty brother, Jatemme (Daniel Kaluuya), want their money back. Even though the money burned up in that fiery explosion along with Harry and his cohorts, someone has to pay and Jamal decides it's Veronica.  He pays her a visit, threatens her and her little dog, just like the Wicked Witch of the West did Dorothy, and now she needs to come up with $2,000,000 or pay some kind of other unspeakable bad price, like maybe never being able to use her legs again?

OK, so let's break this down. 

You, Veronica, are a recent widow who supposedly had no idea about your husband's criminal activities.  Now those criminal activities have come to roost on YOU and your life is being threatened over something your husband did.  So what do you do?  Why, you would do what any normal woman would do, right? - you come up with the brilliant idea of entering into criminal activities yourself, to pull off a complicated heist to pay off the debt.  WHAAAT???

Speaking of heist films with women as the heisters, one can't help but compare this to "Ocean's 8," but the difference is that with "Ocean's 8," you cared about the women.  There was some humor and some humanity.  In this film, I didn't care about any of them.  The men were as evil as it gets and the women were not fleshed out and, actually, were kind of boring.

So the characters were one thing, but then there were the unbelievable, almost laughable moments.  

For example, as part of the preparation for the heist, Linda needs to find out about a building designed by a woman architect.  She goes to the woman architect's house and when her husband answers the door, Linda pretends to work for the woman's firm. However, it soon becomes apparent to the husband that Linda does not work for the firm because she doesn't know that his wife is dead!  She then breaks down and confesses that her husband has also just died.  And then out of nowhere, the two START KISSING!!!!  And then she leaves and do we ever see that guy again?  No.  I think I talked out loud to the screen saying something like "What the..?".

After another odd plot twist -- I heard one of the guys in the audience say "That was a stretch."  So now someone else besides me is talking to the screen.

We can usually count on Viola Davis to deliver wonderful performances, but here her performance was so over dramatic and dour, I almost did another screen shout to say, "Viola, get over it!"  But then I decided to cut her some slack.  I think it was Hubby who mentioned that perhaps that's what good actors do when what they have to work with lets them down, and sorry to say that the screenplay by Gillian Flynn and director Steve McQueen (based on the book by Lynda La Plante) did let the actors down.  The dialogue was over dramatic and there were just too many odd moments, plot holes, a deux ex machina or two, and I think there was even a McGuffin in there.  So when the script isn't good, actors tend to overdo it.  They just cry more and shout louder and hope that no one will notice. Sorry, Viola, I noticed.

So you get my point.  It wasn't good.  You can tell a movie isn't very good when everyone wants to shout at the screen.  Well, unless it's a horror film.  Then we are required to yell out, "DON'T GO DOWN THERE!!!"  But I don't think this was supposed to be a horror film, though, I supposed that could be debatable.

OK, so what about the other actors?

Colin Farrell is usually good, but his performance here wasn't particularly memorable.  I was more mesmerized by his eyebrows. They are very big. Which should tell you how bored I was if I was fixated on his eyebrows.  And then there is Daniel Kaluuya.  I totally get why he would want to play a bad guy after playing a good guy in "Get Out," but his bad guy is so bad it was cringe worthy and how he ends up in the film was actually kind of laughable and just a bit too convenient for the plot.  

Jacki Weaver plays a mother from hell, and Robert Duval is the father from hell so not that hard to play a one note part like that.  Lukas Haas is even in this.  Remember him as the little kid in "Witness?" He's all grown up and plays a wealthy architect who would rather pay for sex than spend the energy needed for a relationship.  All I could think while watching him in this, even though his character was needed as a plot device, was "What strange casting. Who thought of him for this?" You can put him in a suit but he still looks like the little kid in "Witness." Even Liam, who I usually adore and is a good actor, acts like he is in a soap opera. Over - the - top!  

The final straw, however, was my disappointment in the roles of the women. 

As you know, I love movies that star women and I am all for female empowerment, but I never felt these women were empowered. Veronica was forced to think outside the box to save herself and pay her husband's debt, but what does she do?  She comes up with the not so bright idea to go down into the criminal gutter to save herself when all I could think was why didn't she just sell her waterfront penthouse on Chicago's Gold Coast? I'm sure she could have gotten two mil for that.  I might have shouted that at the screen too. And the other women?  I never figured out why they went along with her because. for one thing, these women didn't really know each other and none of them were threatened by mean old Jamal and his brother. Think about it.  If a woman you had never met before approached you and said let's do an elaborate heist together because I need the money, what would you do?

The film just didn't work for me and that is so strange, because McQueen is an accomplished director who I have admired in the past and the film is full of big name actors. They just were not fleshed out very well.  The bad guys were so bad as to be laughable, and I didn't feel like I had any real idea who these women were, so, like I said, I didn't care about any of them.  There was absolutely no one to root for. 

Oh, and if you read my reviews, you know I have given you a hint from time to time about how to tell who the bad guy is or what the twist will be.  Remember what I said?  When there is a big name actor in a movie and he or she seems to only have a very small role...Watch out...

Rosy the Reviewer says...with all of this star power and the director who brought us "12 Years a Slave" and "Shame," you would think this would be a great movie.  But you would be wrong.  

***Some Movies You Might Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)!


Bel Canto (2018)

South American rebels invade the home of a wealthy industrialist where a famous opera singer is performing and take everyone hostage.

The term "bel canto" means "a lyrical style of operatic singing using a full rich broad tone and smooth phrasing."  I have no idea what that means in regards to this story line except for the fact that an opera singer just happens to be a prominent member of those held hostage when South American rebels take over a private party where the opera singer is performing.

Famous opera singer Roxanne Coss (Julianne Moore) has been brought to an unnamed South American country to perform at a private party put together for Mr. Hosokawa (Ken Wantanabe), a rich Japanese industrialist who is also a huge fan of Ms. Coss's.  He has been lured there in hopes that he will invest in the country with one of his factories. However, the party is disturbed by rebels who thought the President would be in attendance. They had planned to take him hostage in hopes of an exchange for political prisoners.  However, the President had begged off the party saying he had an important political engagement when in fact he wanted to stay home and watch his favorite telenovela. Sounds like someone we know.

Now the rebels are stuck with a party full of rich folks instead.  They let the women, elderly and disabled leave but keep Ms. Coss, realizing they have someone of worth in their midst.  Messner (Sebastian Koch), a member of the International Committee of the Red Cross, shows up as hostage negotiator, but there is a long stand off.  Days turn into weeks, and as time goes by, rebels and hostages living together becomes the new normal. They all get used to each other.  And some more than others.  Roxanne and Hosokawa hook up; his translator, Gen (Ryo Kase), hooks up with one of the female rebels, Carmen (Maria Mercedes Coroy), and even the head rebel (Tenoch Huerta) starts to loosen up a bit.  

And then it all goes to hell.

Directed by Paul Weitz, this is one of those films that looked really good from the trailer but when you see the film you realize the trailer was as good as it was going to get.

I have realized from watching this film that I am kind of over Julianne Moore.  She has developed some actressy mannerisms that bother me.  And she just doesn't look like someone who would sound like Renee Fleming (who does the actual singing in the film).  I think this wasn't very good casting, and even so, Julianne's part isn't really the lynchpin of this film. 

And like I said, I didn't really understand the relationship between the title of this film, opera and the rest of it. Perhaps it is more apparent in Ann Patchett's book upon which this film is based (adapted by Weitz and Anthony Weintraub), but it didn't seem that the film really needed the opera connection, because it's really about that whole Stockholm Syndrome thing - everyone - hostages and rebels - starting to like each other -  and there were some interesting relationships that developed that had nothing to do with Moore's character. In fact, Moore didn't really have that much to do here.  

And then, geez, there was that strange ending...

Rosy the Reviewer says...from the trailer, I was looking forward to seeing this but was ultimately disappointed.

***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***

118 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?

Things to Come (1936)

Here is what H.G. Wells thought 2036 would look like from his 1936 perspective.

But it starts in 1940, where things have settled down from years of war.  People think that things are getting better.  But then it starts all over again and by 1966, things haven't been going well for the human race.  There has been nothing but war.  And now there is a wandering pestilence that threatens to wipe out the human race.  But by 1970 things are getting better, well, better if you think that living in a kind of tribal feudalism existence constitutes better.

But then a very young Raymond Massey shows up in a futuristic airplane and proclaims that there are others calling themselves "Wings over the world" who have figured out that the world needs "the brotherhood of efficiency to save civilization."

The first 20 minutes of the film is war footage which included what was probably very advanced special effects for a 1936 film.  And it's in color, which is also unusual. The screenplay was written by H.G.Wells, based on his book "Outline of History," and it's interesting to see what 1930's people thought the world would look like in 1970 and beyond. The film has a "Metropolis" feel and is very pro technology, and as civilization progresses, I guess, even back in the 1930's, the next step is naturally to conquer space.  But there is always someone who is a sour puss.  In this case, it's Cedric Hardwicke who wants to stop progress and who misses "the good old days." Sound familiar?

The future looks a lot like classical Greece or Rome with men wearing togas and giving long speeches and proclaiming deep thoughts. 

"If we don't end war, war will end us."

"For man, no rest and no ending, conquest after conquest.  He must go on conquest beyond conquest. First this little planet with its winds and ways. And then all the laws of mind and matter that restrain him.  Then the planets about him... And at last, out across immensity to the stars.  And when he has conquered all of the deeps of Space and all the mysteries of Time, still he will be beginning."

Okayyyy...Actually, the future looks a lot like "Star Trek," but you get the idea.  It goes on and on like that.  No real characterizations or plot, just guys in togas saying stuff like that.  Directed  by William Cameron Menzies, this was the most costly British production of its time and flopped at the box office.  I am not surprised.  It flopped with me too.

Why it's Must See: "William Cameron Menzies' screen version of H.G. Wells' speculations about the world's future after a disastrous second World War destroys European civilization is perhaps the first true science fiction film...In fact, few science-fiction movies are as concerned as is [this film] with a rigorously historical approach to fictionalized prophecy."
---"1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die"

Rosy the Reviewer now we know what we have to look forward to in 2036.  Togas.

***The Book of the Week***

My Love Story by Tina Turner (2018)

Tina Turner's Second Act.

If you read Tina's first book ,"I, Tina," or saw the film based on her life "What's Love Got To Do With It," where she shared the abuse she endured married to Ike Turner, you might think you know Tina's story but as she points out in this latest memoir, it's been 40 years since she got herself out of that disastrous marriage so get over it. A lot has happened since then. 

So this memoir is all about bringing you up-to-date with where Tina is today, though in case you missed her first book or that movie, she does a recap of her life with Ike, one that is almost unbelievable in its brutality.  You can't help but wonder how and why she hung in there so long. 

However, this time around, Tina recounts fascinating stories of how she rose from the ashes of her marriage to and musical collaboration with Ike to forge a career of her own that eclipsed The Ike and Tina Turner Revue.  From her hit song "What's Love Got to Do With It," to her best-selling album "Private Dancer," to her Grammys, her movie career ("Tommy," "Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome"), to her dedication to Buddhism and meditation to her happy marriage, Tina shares everything that has happened since she made that fateful decision to walk out on Ike with nothing but the clothes on her back. She shares her friendships with those who helped her along the way: particularly Mick Jagger and David Bowie (she attributes Bowie's interest in her burgeoning solo career for her success on her own).

"People called me an 'overnight sensation.' Of course, there is no such thing, but there ARE second acts.  The second time around, I had the opportunity to rewrite my life -- to do it all over again, as I wanted -- without having to live in the shadow of someone else."

After her song "What's Love Got To Do With It?" hit #1 on the charts, Tina never heard from Ike again.  He died December 12, 2007.

Today at 78 Tina has been married to Erwin Bach for five years after a 27 year long love affair and despite a stroke and other health problems, lives happily in Switzerland.

Rosy the Reviewer says...let's just say, things turned out just fine for Miss Tina!

Thanks for reading!

See you next Friday 


"Green Book"


The Week in Reviews
(What To See and What To Avoid)


the latest on

"My 1001 Movies I Must See

Before I Die Project" 

If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at

Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.

Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 

Go to, find the movie you are interested in.  Scroll down below the synopsis and the listings for the director, writer and main stars to where it says "Reviews" and click on "Critics" - If I have reviewed that film, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.