Showing posts with label Disaster Films. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Disaster Films. Show all posts

Friday, February 9, 2018

"Phantom Thread" and The Week in Reviews

[I review the movie "Phantom Thread" as well as DVDs "Geostorm" and "Last Flag Flying.  The Book of the Week is "After the Eclipse: A Mother's Murder, a Daughter's Search."  I also bring you up-to-date with "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project" with "Sansho the Bailiff."]

Phantom Thread

A brilliant dress designer and confirmed bachelor meets his muse...and his match.

This film is hyped as Daniel Day-Lewis's last performance as he has announced that he is retiring from acting.  But he has retired before.  Remember when he "retired" and moved to Italy to become a cobbler?  I'm not lying.  You can't make this stuff up.  But then he started acting again so I'm not holding my breath this time.  Actors are actors for a reason -- they need the spotlight.  But you never know.  Day-Lewis is a strange guy.

Speaking of strange guys, here Day-Lewis plays Reynolds Woodcock, a brilliant English dress designer and confirmed bachelor living in 1950's London. He lives with his current muse and his sister, Cyril (Lesley Manville), but it is obvious early on that his current muse is getting on his nerves.  You see, Reynolds is a fastidious, prickly sort, one of those guys who expects everyone to kowtow to him, the kind of man who expects to get his own way all of the time and has no problem showing his irritation when he doesn't.  Geniuses are like that, I guess, and can get away with being jerks.  Reynolds has his routine and he likes to stick to it.  No one should speak to him in the morning (if breakfast doesn't go right, it ruins his whole day) or disturb him while he is working and absolutely no surprises. I'm not a fan of those kinds of guys, brilliant or not. 

However, all of that changes when Reynolds meets Alma (Vicky Krieps), a young immigrant waitress in a seaside town where he has a cottage.  Alma is a beautiful, but quiet and shy, much younger woman and is taken in by Reynolds' charm and sophistication, though, I found his wooing of her very, very creepy.  However, she becomes his muse and lover, and moves in with him, but she, too, soon falls prey to Reynolds' lifestyle which includes his irritation at her interruption of his quiet breakfast.  Scraping her toast with butter and pouring coffee is enough to make him bristle. He also takes to ignoring her for long periods of time.  It quickly becomes clear to her that he isn't going to marry her any time soon, either, except, what Reynolds doesn't realize is that he has met his match in Alma. Sometimes it's those quiet, shy types who end up getting what they want.

Reynolds' doting but no-nonsense sister, Cyril, whose territorial presence hovers over everything, watches the relationship unfold (think Mrs. Danvers in "Rebecca"). She has seen it all before.  But what she and Reynolds don't realize is that Alma may see to be a shy, retiring and moldable young woman, but there is a steely interior at work in Alma and she figures out a unique way to get Reynolds to propose. 

Sometimes the thread that holds people together could be an unseen strange or even dangerous one.

Writer and director Paul Thomas Anderson, who has a cult following for his film "There Will Be Blood (which also starred Day-Lewis)," and who also directed "Boogie Nights," "Magnolia" and "The Master," among other critical successes, can be counted on to make interesting, original films and does it once again here, though this is definitely a departure from the content of his other films.  He has produced a film more in the vein of the glamorous romantic films of the 50's - think Douglas Sirk and Ross Hunter or the elegant and lush British films of Merchant and Ivory with beautiful cinematography and gorgeous dresses by Mark Bridges, who has an Oscar nomination for costume design for this film. But don't be fooled. The film may be lush and beautiful and romantic but it has a twist that reminds us once again of Anderson's originality and quirky take on life and the last 30 minutes were very strange and kind of lost me, but then what great film doesn't leave some questions to be asked and thought about? The film is also one of the nine films nominated for Best Picture this year.

As I said, Day-Lewis is a strange guy - he is one of those actors who lives his role at home as well as on the screen (his poor wife) - but he is also one of our greatest actors.  Whenever he is in a film, an Oscar nomination for Best Actor is a no-brainer and this year is no exception.  Lesley Manville is also nominated for a Best Supporting Actress Oscar, and though you might not know her name, if you watch a lot of British mysteries or films you will recognize her face. 

Krieps is a newcomer and could be a clone of a young Meryl Streep.  In fact, watching the film I could have sworn she was one of Streep's daughters.  Her performance was impeccable and she held her own with Day-Lewis, but unfortunately she was not recognized for her performance by the Academy, but keep your eyes out for her.  She is one to watch.

Rosy the Reviewer says...a beautiful film that deserves its Best Picture Oscar nomination and harks back to the romantic films of the past highlighted by an interesting, twisty story and brilliant performances. 

***Some Movies You May Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)!


Geostorm (2017)

It seems that a couple of years from now - actually next year, 2019 - all hell is going to break loose with the weather but never fear.  The world will come together to find a way to counteract the storms - or will it?

So when this film begins, there were some weather issues but we have made it through 2019 and everything has been going along swimmingly.  No major weather catastrophes because of a weather satellite net called Dutch Boy (remember the Dutch kid who put his finger in the dike?) that was invented to keep bad weather in check.

But what do you do when the satellites start blowing fuses?

Well, you call in Gerard Butler, that's what.

This film turned out to be a surprise hit last year so never doubt the box office power of Gerard Butler.  The same thing happened with his most recent film "Den of Thieves."  No one heard of it and it made a splash at the box office.

So what's a Geostorm?

No, it's not the Republicans taking over Congress, that's the GOP.  No, a Geostorm is basically the end of the world.

The film begins with thunder and ominous music and a child's voice-over:

"Everyone was warned but no one listened."

So it's a good thing we have Gerard Butler who plays Jake Lawson, the scientist who invents Dutch Boy, a sort of satellite net that protects earth from bad weather.  Dutch Boy has been doing a good job of keeping the world safe from the weather and it's all been handled by the United States.  But in three years, the United States will be handing Dutch Boy over to an International Committee and Lawson is called up in front of a U.S. Committee to reassure them that Dutch Boy is working properly and everything is going to be fine.

However, Lawson is not the reassuring type and manages to insult everyone there. You see, Lawson is a bit of an arrogant rogue.  He is abrasive and angry and his younger brother, Max (Jim Sturgess), who also works for the government and who is usually able to smooth things over for Jake, can't do it this time.  Jake rankles the Committee so much that he is fired and Max is assigned to take over Dutch Boy. That certainly doesn't help the brothers' relationship, which was on a slippery slope to begin with.

Fast forward three years and you can guess what is going to happen, right?

UN troops discover a village where everything is frozen including the inhabitants.  Now that wouldn't necessarily be a strange thing except the village was in the middle of an Afghan desert.

Now Dutch Boy is in trouble and seems to actually be attacking earth. Horrible weather has returned and only one person can save the world.  Guess who.

Right, Gerard Butler, I mean, Jake Lawson.

But Jake, after being fired, has gone off the grid to pout and is living in a trailer with his young daughter.  He is divorced and why he has custody of his daughter when it seems he has a perfectly good relationship with his ex-wife is never explained but we had to have the little girl so we could have that ominous voice over at the beginning.  And of course the little girl is super smart and precocious and says things like "shit happens."  Shoot me now.

So Max has to coax Jake back and he does that by telling Jake it's a mistake he has made and now he has to fix it.  And there isn't much time because all hell is breaking loose with the weather again.

None of this film really makes any sense, and it's actually more of a Star Wars kind of spy movie than a disaster film, even though the trailer definitely hyped this film as a classic disaster film.  In between the few disaster scenes there is a lot of boring, geeky science talk and the whole thing is overdramatic as hell with Girard angrily yelling most of his lines. It's also a mystery, a story of sabotage, a romance and did I mention it's all very overdramatic?

To save the world, Jake has to make his way up to the space station where he meets an International crew and they all try to figure out why Dutch Boy is malfunctioning while at the same time the weather is wreaking havoc on women in bikinis and little dogs.  It seems that someone is covering up a defect and if what is going on isn't figured out soon - we actually have a timer - a Geostorm is an inevitability.

Now I am going to give you a hint.  It's not exactly a spoiler but here is something I have discovered from watching many, many British mysteries.

In murder mysteries, if you are trying to identify the killer and there is an actor in the film who is quite famous but who has a very small part, nine times out of ten, that's your killer. Or as in this film, if we are trying to figure out who is sabotaging Dutch Boy, look for a character with a very small part who seems to be out of place or you wonder why he or she is in the film.  That's all I'm going to say about that but I had it figured out by the time the big reveal happened.  And you can thank me later for that important information.

Written by Dean Devlin and Paul Guyot and directed by Devlin, the film seems to be very pro-globalization, which is a very controversial topic these days and the President is a controversial character, which also seems familiar, but the whole thing plays like a cartoon and it's difficult to care about any of it.  Lots of big names in this film and you have to wonder what they were thinking.

Rosy the Reviewer says...the disaster scenes were the best part of this film but unfortunately there weren't enough of them to save this film from the disaster it is.

Last Flag Flying (2017)

Considered a "spiritual sequel" to "The Last Detail," and a 30 year update.

I have to say right up front that "The Last Detail" was one of my all-time favorite films with Jack Nicholson doing his thing and a brilliant, touching story by Daryl Ponicsan who also wrote this screenplay.  Also I am a huge fan of director Richard Linklater (who collaborated on the screenplay), so that's why I wanted to see this film, despite the fact that I am not much of a Bryan Cranston or Steve Corell fan, I don't really like guy buddy movies and the trailer looked dumb.

But I was looking forward to seeing this only to discover that the names of the characters had been changed and the film didn't really have much to do with "The Last Detail" at all.

But I wanted to give it a chance.

It's 2003 and Larry "Doc" Shepherd (Steve Carell) is on a mission.  His wife has died and his only son has just been killed in the Iraq War and his body is coming home to be buried at Arlington with full military honors.  Doc looks up his old Vietnam War buddies, Sal Nealon (Bryan Cranson), who is an alcoholic and ironically running a bar in Norfolk, and Richard Mueller (Laurence Fishburne), who has become a pastor, to ask them to accompany him to pick up his son's body.  These men haven't fared very well since they served together in Vietnam.  They were something once, now they are something else, so says Sal philosophically. 

The film takes quite a while to set up the story before much happens, but in the second half we finally find out just how Doc's son was killed and Sal and Richard have to decide whether to tell Doc.  Doc also decides he doesn't want to bury his son at Arlington after all, but rather to take him home, and the film becomes a sort of sad buddy road trip film with a very anti-war tone.

Isn't it strange how you take a dislike to some actors even though you don't know them personally and never will?  And you don't really have a good reason for not liking them?  That's how I feel about Cranston and Corell.

Not sure why I don't like Carell.  He has certainly grown up a bit since "The Office " and "The 40-Year-Old Virgin."  Maybe it's the characters he has played - clueless idiots - and playing Bobby Riggs in "Battle of the Sexes" didn't help.  However, he is very toned down here.  In fact he is so toned down he barely registers.

Likewise, I don't relate to Cranston, though I certainly give him props for his versatility.  He can play comedy ("Why Him?") or drama ("Trumbo") but something about his delivery seems to be bombastic and grumpy, no matter what he is playing.  I like Fishburne but he can be kind of one note as well.

But I am a huge fan of director Linklater - I thought "Boyhood" was brilliant - so you can imagine my disappointment when I didn't really like this film. For me, something just got lost along the way.  The film was too talky, too didactic, too slow, and I kept waiting for something to happen and nothing did. 

Though the film seemed to be a labor of love for Linklater - his affection for the characters was apparent as was his message of friendship and his views on the Iraq War and of America are ones I agree with, but despite good intentions, the film was not a particularly good theatrical experience and seemed too overt, something that surprised me coming from Linklater.  I think of him as a more subtle filmmaker who lets things happen visually. Perhaps if you are a man and a veteran the film might speak to you more. The film felt like a coming-of-age film for middle-aged men and maybe it was.  You have to grow up sometime, I guess. 

Rosy the Reviewer Linklater but he missed the mark on this one for me.

***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***

156 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?

Sansho the Bailiff (1954)

In medieval Japan, a governor is sent into exile for choosing compassion over his duty, and when his wife and children try to join him, they are enslaved and put through a life of oppression and suffering.  I know it sounds bleak and it is but trust's also inspiring.

Based on a classic folk tale and directed by Kenji Mizoguchi, this is the story of human reslilience in the face of evil.

An idealistic governor in 11th century Japan disobeys the feudal lord and is cast into exile, leaving his wife, Tamaki (Kinuyo Tanaka) and children, Anju (Kyoko Kagawa) and Zushio (Yoshiaki Hanayagi), to fend for themselves. Their compassionate father had taught the children that "Without mercy, a man is like a beast," and Zushio never wanted to forget that.

Six years later, the wife and children set off to find him.  When they can't find lodging, an old seemingly kind lady offers to put them up but instead sells them into slavery.  The mother and children are separated, the mother is taken by boat to be sold into prostitution and the children are sold to Sansho the Bailiff for a life of hard labor. 

Ten years pass.  The kids are now 18 and 23.  Zushio has given up and accepted his lot, and forgotten what his father had taught him about mercy. In fact,  he has become a trusted henchman for Sansho, carrying out brutal acts on anyone who tries to escape.  He had not been able to live up to his father's teachings about being merciful, but he eventually has an epiphany about how bad he has become.  He decides he must find his father, and Anju and he plot his escape.  He pledges to come back for her but Anju, realizing the futility of that and in order to help Zushio's escape, kills herself as a decoy.

Zushio does escape and is able to regain his family's noble standing and returns to Sansho's compound, this time as an official where he outlaws slavery.  That done, he goes to find his mother in what is one of the most emotionally charged scenes ever.  I defy you not to cry.

This film is a reminder that no matter what century you live in, life can be very hard for many and evil exists, but the love of family and the strength of the human spirit can prevail.

Why it's a Must See: " of the great emotional and philosophical journeys ever made for the cinema.  Possibly the high point in an unbroken string of masterpieces made by Kenjo Mizoguchi shortly before his death, [this film] features the perfection of a signature visual style -- made up predominantly by long, complexly staged shots, paced by gliding camera movements..."
---"1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die"

Mizoguchi was not as famous as Kurosawa but directed 86 films between 1923 and 1956.  He is not well-known now but in the 1950's he was considered the best.

Rosy the Reviewer says...a beautiful film that shows that despite a world of violence, betrayal and evil, love will transcend it.

***Book of the Week***

After the Eclipse: A Mother's Murder, A Daughter's Search by Sarah Perry (2017)

A young girl comes of age after the murder of her young mother.

Natural events take on more significance when accompanied by unnatural tragic events in one's life and that is why Perry remembers an eclipse when she was 12 - because soon after her young mother was murdered.  That eclipse was forever imprinted on Perry and stands as a symbol of the darker side of life. 

Sarah lived with her single mother, Crystal, in rural Maine.  Sarah was 12 and asleep in her bed when she heard her mother cry out and when she found her mother, her mother was dead.  The assailant escaped into the night and Sarah was left motherless.  Shipped back and forth between well-meaning friends and her mother's sisters, Sarah's life was difficult and lonely and she grew up in the shadow of her mother's unsolved murder.

Twelve years later, there was a trial but still many unanswered questions, so the adult Sarah, who wanted to understand her mother's life, began a personal investigation that took her back to Maine and back to all of those childhood memories. 

This book is part memoir and part true crime who-done-it as Perry tries to not only make sense of her mother's life but to discover who killed her.  It was 12 years before a suspect surfaced but even today Perry is not really sure if he was the one or what really happened that night even though she was there.

This is a very heart-felt and emotional read that will pull you in.

Rosy the Reviewer says...if you like well-written true crime with a personal slant, you will like this book.

Thanks for reading!

See you next Friday 

for my review of 

"The Shape of Water"


The Week in Reviews
(What to See or Read and What to Avoid)

 and the latest on

"My 1001 Movies I Must See Before 
I Die Project." 

If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at

Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.
Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 

Go to, find the movie you are interested in.  Scroll down below the synopsis and the listings for the director, writer and main stars to where it says "Reviews" and click on "Critics" - If I have reviewed that film, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.

Friday, August 26, 2016

"Jason Bourne" and The Week in Reviews

[I review Matt Damon's new movie "Jason Bourne" as well as DVDs "San Andreas" and "Sing Street."  The Book of the Week is Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s view of the Martha Moxley murder "Framed."  I also bring you up-to-date with "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project" with "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari."]

Jason Bourne

Trained CIA assassin Jason Bourne (Matt Damon) is back and still trying to figure out who the hell he is.

I am fundamentally opposed to having to do homework before attending a movie, but that's what I wished I had done before seeing this film. I didn't know what the heck was going on for the first hour, because I had forgotten what had taken place in the earlier films. I mean, what do you expect?  It's been nine years since the last one.  So with some of these franchises, if it's been awhile since the last one, you might need to bone up a bit.

But that's not to say I didn't like this film.  I did.  It's action-packed, intelligent, and I love Matt Damon.  He always delivers.  Here he is the badass trained killer, Jason Bourne, who for the fifth time is still trying to find out who he really is.

For those of you who are like me, as in can't remember crap, here is a bit of background:

Jason Bourne is a character created by writer Robert Ludlum.  Bourne is a CIA assassin who is suffering from extreme memory loss and spends much of the films trying to find out how he got himself into this lifestyle as in killing people and being hunted by the CIA (not fun)!

In the first film, "The Bourne Identity," we meet Jason as he takes on the persona of Jason Bourne, though he doesn't remember anything about who he really is or was.  However, he discovers that he is a trained assassin and he also discovers that he must not have been a very good employee because now his employer, the CIA, wants to kill him.

In the subsequent films - there are four more before this one, though Damon only starred in four of the five films - Bourne continues to expose shifty stuff going on in the CIA (and there is lots of it), women come and go, and he continues to seek revenge, go back into hiding, seek revenge, go back into hiding (you get the picture), while at the same time the CIA is trying to kill him.  This film is no exception.

When "Jason Bourne" begins, Jason is hanging out in Eastern Europe engaging in bare knuckle fighting.  That was my first "Huh?" moment. Then we switch to Nicky Parsons (Julia Stiles), who has also been in hiding since "The Bourne Ultimatum," has now resurfaced and joined forces with a Julian Assange-type character to expose shady CIA dealings.  However, in so doing she has also gained access to some sensitive CIA files that shed some light on Bourne's past and his father's role in Operation Treadstone, the program that trained Bourne to be an assassin.  Turns out Bourne's father was an integral part of that program, but did not want his son to participate.  His lack of cooperation cost him his life.  The CIA does not mess around if you are not on board!  

CIA director Robert Dewey (Tommy Lee Jones, in his usual grumpy, craggy-faced performance) is not happy about this turn of events and hunts down Parsons and Bourne using a bad guy who he calls an "asset" played menacingly by Vincent Cassel.  He also has help from Heather Lee (Alicia Vikander), who is the head of the CIA's Cyber Ops Division and who possesses incredible technical skills. When Bourne learns that Dewey had his father killed, Bourne seeks revenge on Dewey. There's that revenge thing again. Meanwhile Lee wants to bring Bourne back into the CIA and she thinks she has Dewey's support while he is in fact planning on killing Bourne.

There is a subplot involving Operation Iron Hand, a surveillance program that seeks secret access to a giant social media service similar to Facebook called Deep Dream, thus spying on all of us social media folks (hey, isn't Facebook already doing that?).  This is a popular plot line these days because as I recall, it was also used in "Now You See Me 2" and "Spectre." 

There are the usual fights and car chases, the one at the end quite a spectacular one, but I have to say that I have grown weary of that formula for spy thrillers.  You can always count on a motorcycle chase or two, several car pile-ups and someone falling or dangling from a high place.  Yawn.  Though I did enjoy the devastation of the late, great Riviera Hotel in Las Vegas, which was set for demolition anyway. It went out in a blaze of glory.

However, director Paul Greengrass delivers a taut, action-packed thriller if you are into that kind of thing and can follow these convoluted and intricate plot lines so prevalent in spy thrillers. I seem to have trouble with it myself.  I have to say, though, I have a particular fondness for director Paul Greengrass and his movies, ever since the incredibly moving "United 93," which told the story of the brave souls who foiled the 9/11 hijackers on that flight, losing their lives in the process and which I defy you to try to get through without crying your eyes out.  He has directed three of the five "Bourne" films and co-wrote this one with Christopher Rouse.  He does a good job keeping the franchise going and if the ending of this film was any indication, it looks like the Bourne movies, like the Duracell Bunny, will keep going and going and going.

Rosy the Reviewer spy thrillers go, this is an intelligent, action-packed ride and Matt Damon's presence pushes it above the run-of-the mill.

***Some Movies You Might Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)!

Now on DVD

San Andreas (2015)

After "The Big One" in California (you know it's coming, right?), a helicopter pilot/fireman makes the treacherous journey across the state to save his daughter.
This movie is probably not a good idea for someone living in earthquake country where earthquakes are not only predictable but inevitable.  And the same goes for movie mavens watching disaster movies like "The Towering Inferno," "The Wave," and this one, which are inevitably predictable.  But despite that I have always had a weakness for disaster films.  They are like horror films - which I also enjoy from time to time - they both have formulas, but disaster films usually employ more of the human element.
With disaster films, the formula includes:
  • Ominous music during a cold opening where something bad happens to an innocent person (remember "Jaws?").  The ominous music also might just play over the opening credits. But ominous music early on is a must!  The filmmakers don't want you to get too comfortable.  They want you to know that something *bad* is going to happen
  • Foreshadowing of that something *bad* that is about to happen.  Earthquake movie?  We get little shakes and rumbles that everybody discounts, except the scientist that no one will listen to.
  • Speaking of which, there is always a scientist who is predicting doom but no one is listening to him (or her).
  • A handsome, selfless but rough and tough leading man to play our hero (and they don't get better than The Rock, who is now our highest paid actor) playing a heroic firefighter who fearlessly flies a helicopter to save people - if anyone can take on an earthquake, it's The Rock)!
  • Heroic music as our hero rescues the heroine or that innocent person in the opening.
  • Heroine music - that's the music that plays when the heroine, with tears in her eyes, watches her man doing something heroic.  It rarely happens when a man watches his woman doing something heroic.
  • Kids in danger - we need some little precocious tykes to worry about
  • Romance - somehow in the midst of the world cracking apart and facing death, people still find the time to make out and have sex.  I don't get it.  I would be running for my life!
  • Overdramatic acting, because no matter how good the actor is, he or she cannot overcome what is usually very overdramatic and lame dialogue.
  • Dramatic, over the top deaths, especially for the bad guys.
  • Several storylines going on at once, especially a mission for our hero (here it's saving his daughter).
  • A coward, there's always a blowhard who turns out to be a coward
  • Improbable rescues
  • An old married couple looking knowingly at each other and hugging as they wait for The End (hey, I'm old, but I certainly wouldn't hang around with Hubby waiting for The End. Screw Hubby.  I would have made a run for it)!
  • At movie's end, if the film has done its job, you are even more scared of earthquakes/tornadoes/meteors/the world ending - than you were before.
  • But when the movie is over, there is an uplifting scene to give you hope and remind you that WE DON'T GIVE UP!

So how did this one measure up?

Yep, it's all here.

Several storylines: The Rock AKA as Dwayne Johnson plays Ray Gaines, an L.A. firefighter and helicopter pilot, who is going through a divorce and is not happy about it.  His soon-to-be ex, Emma (Carla Gugino) is going with Daniel Riddick (Ioan Gruffudd), a guy who builds really tall buildings and is about to build the very tallest one ever in San Francisco.  Uh-oh.  Daniel and Blake (Alexandra Daddario), Ray's and Emma's daughter, are headed to San Francisco.  When they get to San Francisco, Daniel introduces Blake to Ben (Hugo Johnstone-Burt), an engineer from England, and his little brother, Ollie (Art Parkinson). Love blooms.  With Blake and Ben, not Blake and Ollie.  Ollie is on hand so we have a precocious little kid to root for when the disaster happens.  Blake is with Daniel in the parking garage when the shaking starts and Daniel hightails it out of there, leaving Blake to get out on her own.  Daniel is our resident coward but he gets his in a cartoon splat of gigantic (and laughable) proportions.  Ben and Ollie rescue Blake and now Ray and Emma have to rescue everyone else.

Paul Giamatti, who always plays Paul Giamatti, also plays a scientist who can predict earthquakes. When he realizes The Big One has arrived, he is asked "Who do we call?"  And in true overdramatic fashion, Paul says, "EVERY - BODY!!!"  I shouldn't blame it all on him.  Some of the dialogue, true to its disaster movie cliches, is cheesy and overdramatic.  It's just that Paul adds an extra layer of cheese.

Anyway, when Ray realizes what is happening, he flies his helicopter to where Emma is to save her, which just so happens to be on top of a skyscraper, and an improbable rescue ensues.  Poor Emma is hippity-hopping over the tops of the skyscrapers trying to outrun the earthquake, and I am yelling at the screen, "Girl, get yourself on that helicopter!"  She does and Ray saves his wife.  Now if that isn't a reason to stay together, I don't know what is.  Then after saving his wife, the two of them decide to fly the helicopter from L.A. to San Francisco to save their daughter, but it crashes in Bakersfield and they have to drive up 101, a highway I know well.  My fellow Monterey County residents will recognize some Salinas Valley locales.  Will Ray and Emma get back in time to save their daughter or get stuck in King City? Well, you know the answer to that, don't you? 

Once the shaking starts, it's one horrendous shake after another.  I actually laughed a couple of times (sorry - I know I will probably pay for my flippancy), because like Paul Giamatti, the special effects were a bit cheesy.  The special effects were obviously computer generated and over-the-top. However, Gugino is always enjoyable. She is currently starring in the Showtime TV show "Roadies" and I really like her.  She has that je ne sais quoi that makes an actor instantly likable.  And The Rock is, well, he's The Rock.  All of the actors did their best, but these kinds of movies are not about the acting.  They are about how much carnage can be inflicted upon them -- and us.

But, hey, don't think it all stops with the earthquake.  Then there's a tsunami and the threat that the whole rest of the United States is going to shake itself to death!

Directed by Brad Peyton and written by Carlton Cuse, I have to say that this film was probably better in 3D at the cinema rather than at 4pm on a weekday after a long day of retirement, but at least I could have a glass of wine with my disaster.

San Francisco folks and those who know the city will enjoy the locales such as the Crookedest Street, SoMo, Coit Tower and the scene where they parachute into AT&T Park, but then again, maybe you won't enjoy watching it all get destroyed since us West Coast people have been threatened with THE BIG ONE for the last 40 years.
And by the way, those of you who don't live on an earthquake fault line and think you don't have anything to worry about, think again.  The movie gives you something to be scared about too.  Be afraid, be very afraid. "San Andreas 2" is already in the works!

You don't judge disaster movies by the same criteria as other dramas.  Disaster movies are supposed to be over the top.  I can recommend it because it's good improbable disaster movie fun.  Well, the earthquake isn't improbable, but the other stuff - improbable disaster movie fun.  Improbable disaster movie fun.  Improbable disaster movie fun.  I keep telling myself that.

And then it happened. The movie ends with a military helicopter flying over the city and a huge American flag unfurls over the Golden Gate Bridge.  My god, no words...I lost it. LOL

Rosy the Reviewer says...this is one of those disaster films that embodies every disaster film cliché, but instead of that being a bad thing, it's so bad it's good.

Sing Street (2016)

A Dublin teen starts a band to impress a girl.  So what else is new?

It's a boy's catholic school in Ireland in the 1980's and the priests are not above boxing ears and humiliating boys they deem rebels and imposing silly rules. Conor Lawlor (Ferdia Walsh-Peelo, which has to be one of the coolest actor names ever) is one of those boys and gets in trouble first for wearing brown shoes to school (he can't afford the requisite  black shoes) and later for his increasing desire to look like a member of Duran Duran

Conor falls for a girl, Raphina (Lucy Boynton), who is an aspiring model and who dresses like Madonna. Like I said, it's the 80's.  He asks her if she wants to be in a music video.  She is intrigued.  The problem is that Conor is not only not making a music video, he doesn't have a band.  But he decides that starting a band will impress her, thus reinforcing the idea that all of our rock gods started bands just so they could impress girls.  It doesn't matter that Conor doesn't know how to play any instruments.  Like I said, it's the 80's.  All he needs is big hair and some catchy pop tunes. 

Conor is introduced to Eamon (Mark McKenna) who can play every instrument and with him on board, Conor manages to fake his way into getting some other musicians to join his band.  They name the band Sing Street (their school is on Synge Street, get it)?  They don't want to be a cover band so Conor tries his hand at writing songs and in true musical comedy fashion comes up with some great songs. The band starts to get gigs and Conor starts to get the girl.  She teaches him to live life more fully which includes wearing eye makeup.

Now Conor starts having even more trouble with the priests.  The head priest drags him into the toilet and rubs his face in the sink.  Undeterred, Conor transforms from a callow school boy to a Duran Duran lookalike. Us old folks still think everyone wanted to be The Beatles, but we didn't realize those 80's teens were inspired by glam rock and jazzy music from the likes of "A-Ha" "Hall and Oates"  and " "Tears for Fears."  I guess we forgot about the 80's. 

Favorite quote:  "No woman can love a man who listens to Phil Collins."

Written and directed by John Carney, who brought us the wonderful "Once," this one sometimes felt like an Irish 80's version of "Glee," but it's a coming of age story and the theme of music as a form of expression that leads to confidence and identity is a good one. The actors are engaging and the music is fine, though not on the level of the songs from "Once."

Ferdia-Walsh is an appealing actor who bears a resemblance to a young Paul McCartney and his love interest, Lucy Boynton, is charming.  All of the other young actors are the usual quirky mix you find in "Let's start a band" movies like this.

Rosy the Reviewer says...a sweet film with some catchy music, but if you are expecting "Once," you will be disappointed.

***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***

239 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920)

Dr. Caligari uses a somnambulist (that's a sleepwalker to you and me) to commit murders.  Dr. Caligari is not a very nice guy.  Or so we are lead to believe.

"The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari" is a 1920 German silent horror film, directed by Robert Wiene and written by Hans Janowitz and Carl Mayer. Considered the quintessential work of German Expressionist cinema, the film begins with our hero, Francis, telling the story of an insane hypnotist (Werner Krauss) who uses a sideshow somnambulist, Cesare (Conrad Veidt), to commit murders. However, as the film progresses and the twist occurs, we wonder, just who is the insane one?

Why it's a Must See: "[This film] is the keystone of a strain of bizarre, fantastical cinema that flourished in Germany in the 1920's and was linked, somewhat spuriously, with the Expressionist art movement...With its sideshow ambience, hypnotic mad scientist villain, and leotard-clad, heroine-abducting monster, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari is a major early entry in the horror genre, introducing images, themes, and characters that became fundamental to the likes of Tod Browning's Dracula and James Whale's Frankenstein (both 1931)."
---"1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die"

The version I saw (on DVD) was taken from a 35mm print restored by the Bundesarchiv Filmarchiv of Germany featuring the original color tinting and toning giving the film a sort of tintype, overexposed look.  The set design is all very art deco and modern, the set designers having used paper sets drawing the shadows onto them.

Since the advent of sound, silent films are difficult for many to watch.  They not only have subtitles we have to navigate but the acting is often histrionic and funny to watch by today's standards.  However, silent films embody the essence of film; they are the ultimate film experience because they are all about the visuals.  No matter what language you speak, you would be able to understand what is going on in a silent film with or without the intertitles.  Silent films deserve their place in film history and should be seen.

It's a horror film but probably less horror and more comedy for today's audiences.  No hatchets in heads or screaming teens running from a knife-wielding attacker.  Just odd characters and a nightmarish creepiness.

Some critics have said the film uses themes of authority and brutality to represent the German war government and Cesare symbolized the common man conditioned to become a soldier conditioned to kill.  Also, author Siegfriend Kracauer, in his book "From Caligari to Hitler," offers the theory that the film "reflects a subconscious need in German society for a tyrant, and is an example of Germany's obedience to authority and unwillingness to rebel against deranged authority. He says the film is a premonition of the rise of Hitler and the Nazi Party."  The film also explores the theme of sanity vs. insanity, or who is really running the asylum?

Rosy the Reviewer says...whatever the deeper meanings may be, this is one strange and creepy film ahead of its time.
(Silent with English intertitles, b & white with color tinting)

***Book of the Week***

Framed: Why Michael Skakel Spent Over a Decade in Prison for a Crime He Didn't Commit by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (2016)

The Martha Moxley murder case was a cause celebre in part because it involved a rich, blonde teenaged girl and partly because of the connection to the Kennedy family.

The night before Halloween in 1975, Martha Moxley was found brutally murdered near her home in the ultra-rich community of Greenwich, Connecticut.  Though there were many suspects, the case remained unsolved until 27 years later when Michael Skakel was convicted of the murder.  He was convicted despite no physical or forensic evidence, no fingerprints or DNA, no witnesses.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is Michael Skakel's cousin; his mother Ethel Kennedy was born Ethel Skakel.  As the title states, Kennedy believes Michael was framed and presents his evidence.  And not just framed, framed through a full-blown conspiracy.

"Because of the dearth of evidence against him and his airtight alibi, a number of people had to commit selfish, malicious, or illegal acts in order to convict Michael...I am going to show that [he] did not and could not have killed Martha Moxley; how and why he got framed for the crime; who did the framing; and how they accomplished it.  I'm also going to show how I tracked down the likely killers, phantoms who moved in and out of Greenwich like shadows...Despite overwhelming evidence of their guilt, Connecticut prosecutors and police still refuse to investigate them.  Today those man walk free, as entrenched, ego-bound police and prosecutors stick to their guns and refuse to acknowledge their mistake."

Written like a true lawyer.  The "number of people" Kennedy alludes to are the Skakel family lawyer whose self-interest it was to point to Michael's culpability; Dominick Dunne, who made a career out of covering high profile murders and who, according to Kennedy, had a vendetta against the Skakel family; Mark Fuhrman, the cop who disgraced himself at the O.J. Simpson trial and who wrote a book about the Moxley murder in hopes of rehabilitating his own image; and the overzealous, and in Kennedy's words, the "morally corrupt" police officer, and "the unscrupulous prosecutor" who all came together in a perfect storm to convict Michael Skakel.

Kennedy wrote this book to make that case. It's a tall order but Kennedy delivers a well thought out indictment of Greenwich law enforcement and others.

Also the Kennedy connection was the catalyst for the notoriety this case enlisted, but ironically Kennedy points out that he didn't even know his Skakel cousins because of a long-standing family feud between the two families.  When Ethel married Bobby, she became a Kennedy and distanced herself from her Skakel roots.

Michael Skakel served 11 and a half years before he was released on appeal and whether or not he will have to stand another trial is still up in the air, but Kennedy definitely makes his case that justice was not done for Martha and Michael Skakel was a pawn in an intricate web of lies and incompetence.

Rosy the Reviewer says...though a bit dry at times, if you like well thought out, compelling true crime nonfiction, this one delivers. 

That's it for this week!

Thanks for reading!

See you Tuesday for


 "How Not to Act Old"



If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at

Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.

Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 

Go to, find the movie you are interested in.  Once there, click on the link that says "Explore More" on the right side of the screen.  Scroll down to External Reviews and when you get to that page, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.
NOTE:  On some entries, this has changed.  If you don't see "Explore More" on the right side of the screen, scroll down just below the description of the film in the middle of the page. Click where it says "Critics." Look for "Rosy the Reviewer" on the list.
Or if you are using a mobile device, look for "Critics Reviews." Click on that and you will find me alphabetically under "Rosy the Reviewer."