[I review the Princess Diana biopic "Spencer" as well as "King Richard" and "CODA," all new movies that have some Golden Globe nominations for either Best Picture or for acting kudos]
Spencer (2021)
A biopic about Princess Diana.
As a huge Princess Diana fan, I paid the $19.98 to Amazon Prime (also available On Demand) to have early access to this film. It's in theatres, too, so I figured that's what it would cost for Hubby and me to see it if we went out. I also thought the film would be worth the price of a ticket just to see Kristen Stewart smile. Think about it. When have you ever seen her smile? Well, she didn't here, either. Or maybe once.
But Stewart did a good job of portraying Diana over the course of a Christmas weekend at Sandringham. I wish I could say the same about the film itself portraying Diana.
This is not a flattering portrait of Diana.
It begins in 1991 with Diana driving her car to Sandringham, the royal estate in eastern England where the family likes to spend Christmas. Fittingly, Diana actually grew up on the estate as a young girl before her father became Earl and moved to Althorp. This is all hinted at in the film, but if you didn't know that about her, you would either miss those references or scratch your head and wonder what the heck was that all about - her going in the night to see her old house. In these early scenes, Diana comes off as a bit of a flibbertigibbet and, yes, this film depicts a time toward the end of her marriage to Prince Charles when things were coming off the rails, but I didn't appreciate this film making her look completely nuts, which she wasn't.
The truth of the matter was that Diana was a 19-year-old virgin, chosen to marry the 30-something-year-old Prince Charles who needed to mend his bachelor ways and settle down. She loved him, he didn't love her. When they were first engaged and asked by reporters if they were in love, Diana replied "Of course." Charles nodded and said something like "Whatever in love means." Right there, I knew she was in trouble. Despite some years where they appeared to be happy as they raised their two sons, Charles was actually in love with someone else the whole time and Diana knew it. So that would drive me crazy too, which being in her shoes myself, it kind of did (yes, that happened to me, but I wasn't married to a prince).
To make matters worse, over the course of this one weekend, I repeat one, that was depicted in the film, Diana runs the gamut of everything we heard she went through over the entire course of her 15-year marriage: bulimia, hanging out downstairs in the kitchen and stuffing herself with food, wandering around the estate at night, trying to throw herself down the stairs, her paranoia. On and on. But then the filmmakers really lost me when she is depicted breaking her pearl necklace at dinner and trying to eat it, I said, "What the hell?" I also couldn't help but ask myself, "What was the point of making this film?" To make Diana look bad? And what was the point of the title?
I know, the film was going back and forth between fantasy and reality to show Diana unraveling in the stultifying atmosphere of the royal family. I get that, but it just went from one crazy act to another. Fifteen years of marriage bundled into two hours. It was just too much.
After the weekend ends and we have endured a tedious two hours of Diana-bashing, she drives off with her sons and there is some sort of rapproachment where it appears she is finally going to find herself and become independent, which I guess is where the title came in. When asked at a KFC drive through (though, god help me, why KFC? One more insult to Diana), who the order was for, she answers "Spencer." But too little too late.
This is also one of those films that does everything in real time. Diana is going to walk down the hall? Well, she walks...down...the...hall. To make matters worse, the soundtrack was annoying, like fingernails on a chalkboard, and veteran actors Sally Hawkins and Timothy Spall were wasted here.
When I first heard that Kristin Stewart was going to play Diana, I didn't see it at all, but if you are going to make a film about a very unhappy time in Princess Diana's life, then Stewart was a good choice because no one does scowling like she does. And that iconic Diana hairstyle helped a lot. Stewart actually looked like her. Her acting was fine (she is nominated for a Golden Globe for her performance) and her accent was even okay, but let's just say, I am sure Diana smiled much more than Stewart did here, even when her life was in shambles.
So Kristen Stewart wasn't the problem I had with this movie.
Written by Steven Knight and directed by Pablo Larrain, if I didn't know better, I would think this film was backed by the royal family themselves to show what they had to put up with and to justify their actions. Though beautifully produced and well-acted, there was just no context to what led up to how nutty Diana was acting in this film. Yes, there were some snippets of a lonely little child (Diana's mother ran off with another man) and Diana's need for love but all of that was so fleeting, if you didn't already know her story, it certainly wouldn't justify this characterization of her. The filmmakers probably thought they could get off the hook with all of the liberties they took with Diana's story by stating at the outset that this film is a "fable." But I'm not letting them. This was a horror story.
And what makes me the most mad is this:
Remember, Diana died almost 25 years ago. There is a whole generation of people who probably don't really know the details of Diana's life, what she went through, how she overcame it and the good that she did. Princess Diana was a young woman who was fed to the royal lions at age 19, eventually found herself and became an advocate for those who couldn't speak for themselves. But this movie shows nothing of that and paints a very negative portrait of her and I can't stand to think of her remembered this way. So I didn't appreciate this very dark portrayal of a dead woman who can't now speak for herself.
Rosy the Reviewer says...can you tell that this movie made me really mad? It was a huge disappointment. Save your money.
King Richard (2021)