Showing posts with label True Crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label True Crime. Show all posts

Friday, April 21, 2017

"Colossal" and The Week in Reviews

[I review the new Anne Hathaway movie "Colossal" as well as DVDs "Toni Erdmann" and "Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children."  The Book of the Week is true crime nonfiction: "Who Killed These Girls?"  I also bring you up-to-date with "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project" with the documentary about the Formula 1 racing phenom "Senna."]




Colossal


A party girl who likes to stay out all night drinking - OK, she's a drunk and kind of a loser - discovers that her actions control a Godzilla-like monster that has attacked Seoul, Korea.

Sounds like a comedy, right?  Well, it sort of is...the first half of the film, anyway.  But then it gets dark, very dark and becomes a sort of Godzilla meets "The Days of Wine and Roses" meets "Fatal Attraction."

Gloria (Anne Hathaway) is a young woman living in NYC.  She likes to drink and party all night long while her boyfriend, Tim (played by the dishy Dan Stevens who is wasted here in a small role) works and keeps things running, until one day after one black-out too many, he packs her bags and kicks her out of their apartment.  So broke, jobless and now homeless, Gloria travels back to her small town to live in her parent's old house that is conveniently empty.  How she has access to that house isn't really explained nor is her backstory as to why she isn't working and appears to be a complete loser, but, oh well, this is a comedy, right? 

Back in her hometown, Gloria meets up with Oscar (Jason Sudeikis), an old grade-school friend, who gives her a job at his bar.  Great job for someone who wants to stop drinking, doncha think? She is still drinking too much, but Oscar seems to be a steadying influence, and their interactions and banter are humorous.  He brings her a TV for her empty house... and then it happens.  She discovers that a Godzilla-like monster is plaguing Seoul, and it's not long before she notices that the monster seems to have some of the very same mannerisms that she has.  Mmmm.  So it's a comedy, right?

Not so fast, Sherlock.  The mystery, of course, and why you continue to watch, is to discover how this could possibly happen.  How would a confused alcoholic young woman who has major blackouts end up controlling a monster a world away?  But before we get to that answer, which isn't really an answer, things start to get dark and you think, "Hey, I thought this was a comedy!" And then a monster robot appears and Oscar starts acting weird...and, oh, geez, it all starts to go south and you mumble to yourself, "Darn, I thought this was supposed to be a comedy." 

And despite the fact that this isn't really a comedy, there are a few bumps too. First, of all, why would anyone ever be able to put two and two together to figure out that a monster plaguing a city on the other side of the world was telepathically linked to you?  And how would she figure out when and where to go to control the monster?  But, OK, I will go with it.  But then, when she figures out how and why that is happening, they lost me.  If she understands the how and why, then she is smarter than I am because even after the so-called explanation is revealed, I didn't really get it. The truth is, there isn't a very good explanation, and the finale of the film defies belief, even by fantasy standards. 

But that doesn't mean I wasn't riveted throughout this film, because I was. 

And there is a message.

Written and directed by Nacho Vigalondo (Hathaway is one of the producers), this is a cautionary tale that shows we all have monsters inside.  It could be the abuse of alcohol, it could be jealousy, it could be obsession, it could be rage, it could be fear, but to overcome those monsters, we have to face them and Gloria literally does.

I have never understood why Anne Hathaway was one of the most hated actresses in Hollywood. She was in 2013, anyway. I always liked her, but I guess for some she was a little too goodie-two-shoes, a little too earnest, lacked humility, whatever, but here she certainly does not have a glamorous role. You should see her hair!  She is playing a role that is far from her usual parts, and come to think of it, you've never seen Jason Sudeikis in a role like this either.

Rosy the Reviewer says...a very strange film that is nevertheless engaging and riveting.



 
***Some Movies You Might Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)!

On DVD




Toni Erdmann (2016)


A man tries to reconnect with his ambitious, hard-working daughter by pretending to be a life coach.

This was the favorite to win the 2017 Best Foreign Language Film Oscar until President Trump issued his Muslim ban and Asghar Farhadi, the Iranian director of another nominated foreign film - "The Salesman" - protested by saying he would not attend the Academy Awards.  Guess what?  The Academy rose up in support and "The Salesman" won the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar.  Now, I am not saying that "The Salesman" did not deserve the award.  I have not seen it, and I did really love his earlier film "A Separation," which also won back in 2012. 

But I have to say, after seeing this film, it was not just one of the best films of 2016, I am declaring right now that it is one of the best movies EVER!!!

To say that this is the story of a father-daughter reunion would be true, but an understatement, because this film is so, so much more than that.

Winfried (Peter Simonischek) is a big practical joker.  We see this right away when a delivery driver tries to deliver a package to Winfried.  He answers the door, pretends not to be the intended recipient, goes back in the house calling for Winfried (himself) and then returns to the door wearing sunglasses and false teeth talking about expecting the delivery of a bomb.  We can see right away that Winfried amuses himself by putting people on. However, the delivery driver was not particularly amused.

I don't much care for practical jokers, finding them to be people who are "on" all of the time which can be exhausting, so when this movie began, I didn't think I would like Winfried. And with a movie that is almost three hours long, which means almost three hours of Winfried, I was not hopeful, but I was wrong. 

Winfried is a piano teacher who doesn't appear to have any students.  He is divorced and lives alone with his old dog.  He has a mother who is dying and a daughter, Ines (Sandra Huller), who is a corporate strategist in Bucharest.  When he attends a party at his ex-wife's house, his daughter, Ines, is there visiting, but it is a quick visit and it's clear to Winfried that she is not happy.  When his dog dies, Winfried decides to give Ines a surprise visit in Bucharest, which we soon see is not necessarily a welcome one.

When he arrives, Ines resigns herself to looking after her father.  They are not estranged per se, but it is clear that the two have not been in contact much and they just don't get each other. Ines is a buttoned-up corporate type and Winfried, is well, a throwback from the 60's and doesn't much care about protocol. Winfried arrives when Ines is in the midst of an important business project so she assigns her assistant to show her Dad around.  When the two finally do get together, Ines takes Winfried to a business reception for the visiting CEO of her company, and she is clearly uncomfortable having him around.

Ines is a tough business woman, but she is clearly a stressed out woman in a man's world.  She is dealing with chauvinism as the men cut her off mid-sentence, minimize her ideas and shunt her off to take the visiting CEO's wife shopping instead of being at work where she hoped to connect with the CEO.  She is clearly not happy but sucks it up.  Winfried also appears to embarrass her with the visiting businessman until it becomes clear that the CEO actually finds Winfried charming and amusing and invites them both for drinks.  Winfried begs off but Ines says she can come to which the CEO disapprovingly replies, "Don't you want to be with your Dad?"  Awkward.  Ines just can't seem to catch a break and having Winfried around doesn't help.

As Winfried spends time with Ines, it becomes clear that the two do not have a close relationship and don't have much to say to each other either.  This film will come close to home for those of us whose adult children have gone off for a life far away, and we no longer have the relationship with them that we once had and feeling like a disruption in their lives when we do see them. And our children are not able to share their problems with us either. Even though we are the people our children have known the longest, we tend to become outsiders in their lives. There is a real lack of understanding between the generations. When our children become adults, we have to forge a new kind of relationship and Winfried realizes that.  However, he thinks that the solution is to try to lighten Ines up. 

And Winfried's idea of lightening people up is to play practical jokes, which like I said, can be wearying and a cover-up for real feelings and emotions.  At one point, Ines says to Winfried, "Do you have any plans in life other than slipping fart cushions under people?" Both father and daughter are closed up and can't communicate.

Winfried eventually realizes that he is not welcome, so he cuts his visit short, says his good-byes to Ines and leaves, much to her relief.  But then...he doesn't really leave.  He returns as Toni Erdmann, wearing a black wig and his ever-present false teeth and keeps showing up at various events passing himself off as that CEO's life coach and consultant, and Ines is forced to go along or embarrass them both.  He couldn't leave his daughter when he knew she needed him.  And he doesn't know it yet, but he needs her too.

There are so many wonderful, telling moments in this film.  There is one  little moment that shows what it's like for a woman to live alone. When Ines is trying to zip up the back of her own dress, she uses a fork to reach back and zip it up, which could stand as a metaphor for her being so focused on her career that she has not had time for marriage or a relationship and has figured out how to manage on her own.  Another pivotal moment involves "naked team building (and you will have to see this film if you want to know more)" that shows just how on the edge Ines is, but when "Toni" shows up in a huge, furry monster costume, Ines realizes how much her Dad loves her.

This is one of my favorite films of all time. 

Written and directed by Maren Ade, this film comments on the cold and sterile world of corporate striving, but it's more a brilliant piece about adult children and their relationships with their parents. Life is about getting things done and we all want our children to be successful, but life is also about creating memories with those we love. However, often, in the frenzy to be successful, life passes us by and suddenly there are no more memories together.  Winfried showed up in Ines's life and disrupted it - that's what we parents do - but he disrupted her life for the better, because his joie de vivre and irreverence for protocol made her finally realize that she wasn't enjoying her life.  Winfried's arrival back into her life reminds Ines what it means to be alive.

However, no matter how good a movie's screenplay or direction, for a two and a half hour film to be successful and to keep your interest, you must care about the characters.  No worries. Huller and Simonischek are wonderful actors, bringing this father and daughter to life and you really, really want them to connect. I can get bored watching a 90 minute movie but for this almost three hour movie, I wasn't bored for a second because the characters were so real and compelling and the story was so engaging and personal.

Side note: The film is mostly in German with English subtitles, but I was reminded of one of the reasons why I love Europe so much. As I said, the film is mostly in German, but it is a combination of German and English and other languages as Ines interacts with business people from all over the world, and in Europe it is not uncommon for many people to know more than one language, often English, so there is almost always common ground for everyone to be able to communicate.  Oh, you don't speak German?  Let's speak English then. Or, you don't speak English?  What about French?  There is the likelihood that there is a language that both people can speak.  One time I was in a bar in Sweden, and the Swedish bartender was talking to two men at the bar and they were all speaking French together, even though the bartender and his customers were not French.  Despite their country of origin, they were able to find a language that they all knew.  We Americans are lucky if we speak English good...I mean, well.

Rosy the Reviewer says...a gorgeous piece of filmmaking but it's also a very personal film that all parents and adult children should see.
(In German, Romanian and English with English subtitles)




Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children (2016)


When Jacob's grandfather dies, he discovers a mystery that defies time.

For years, Abe Portman (Terence Stamp) had told stories to his grandson Jake (Asa Butterfield) about his childhood battling monsters and spending WW II living at Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children in Cairnholm, Wales. The home's children and their headmistress, Miss Alma Peregrine (Eva Green), possessed paranormal abilities and were known as "Peculiars. When Jake goes to Abe’s house responding to a phone call, he finds him dying with his eyes removed. Abe tells Jake to go to "the loop of September 3, 1943. The bird will explain everything."

So Jake and his rather clueless Dad (Chris O'Dowd) travel to Cairnholm only to discover that the home had been bombed during a Luftwaffe raid and only a derelict remains.  However, when Jake explores the house, he goes through a portal of time and is back in 1943 before the house was destroyed.  He meets Miss Peregrine and the 11 children under her care.

Miss Peregrine explains that she belongs to a class of female Peculiars named "Ymbrynes," who can transform into birds (in Miss Peregrine's case, a peregrine falcon - duh).  She can also manipulate time.  Miss Peregrine and the children are living in a time loop that she created, set to September 3, 1943, that allows them to live the same day over and over, that is, live the day right before the bombing of the school and then rewind before the bombing happens.  They also avoid aging if they stay in the loop.  And so with that, the school comes to life and Jake is transported back to 1943, and this fanciful story of good versus evil begins.  It's a kind of "Groundhog Day" meets "Lost Horizon."

And thus begins this latest from the mind of Tim Burton. When it's a Tim Burton film, you know you are in for a crazy ride, but I will say at the outset, this is a bit of a horror film, and though it is aimed at kids, there are certainly some kids who would be scared by this film.

Jake is introduced to the children, all of whom have various "peculiar" talents: there are two little twins who look like they are wearing identical Mike Myers masks; an invisible boy we can only see when he wears clothes; a girl who can conjure fire with her bare hands; a boy full of bees; a kid who makes deadly baby dolls; a boy who can project his dreams; a little girl who has a carnivorous mouth on the back of her head; and Emma (Ella Purnell), a young teen girl who seems to have a problem with gravity and must wear weighted shoes so she won't fly off into the stratosphere. and who provides a love interest for Jake.  It turns out that Jake is also a peculiar and his particular talent is being able to see the "Hollows," invisible monsters that are disfigured Peculiars led by shape shifter Mr. Barron (Samuel L. Jackson), who hunt Peculiars to consume their eyeballs, which allows them to regain visibly human form.  I know, it's complicated.

Miss Avocet (Judi Dench) arrives to warn Miss Peregrine and the children that Mr. Barron is capable of breaking into the time loops and he and the Hollows are coming after them, so the film becomes a battle between the Peculiars and the Peculiar hunters.

Tim Burton is a master at creating an experience, surreal atmospheres and even makes modern day Florida look surreal. Here he has put his touch on the Ransom Riggs' fantasy series adapted by Jane Goldman. The music is perfect, the costumes are perfect, and the characters are very, very strange.  The first hour of the film is mesmerizing as the film sets up the story, but the last half gets very, very...well, peculiar...and dark...and ends with a big showdown with Barron and his Hollows where all of the children get to use their talents against them.

Watching this film, I couldn't help but see this film as a metaphor (I am always conscious of metaphors!) for the English children who were sent out into the country during WWII to avoid the bombing and how scary that must have been for those children, full of metaphorical monsters (Nazis) and how they might have turned their experiences into fanciful adventures.  And another metaphor: "Peculiar" is good.  This is a love poem to all of us "peculiars."

Butterfield and Purnell are both attractive and engaging young actors, and Eva Green, who I remember as Vesper Lynd in some Bond films, fits the beautiful yet enigmatic Miss Peregrine.  Allison Janney is even in this as a shrink who comes back later in the film as something else. What movie is Allison Janney NOT in these days.  She is everywhere.  Likewise, doesn't it seem like Samuel L. Jackson is in every action movie too?  But veteran actors Terence Stamp and Judy Dench are always a welcome addition to any film.

Rosy the Reviewer says...a magical experience for adults and teens, but might be a very, very scary one for little kids.





"My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project"


205 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?





Senna (2010)


A documentary about Ayrton Senna, a Brazilian Formula 1 driver, who burst onto the Formula 1 racing scene in 1984 and won the World Championship three times before his untimely death at 34.

Through a mix of racing footage and home videos, this film follows Senna's life and career as he wins race after race.  It also focuses on his rivalry with another champion, Alain Prost, who was the current king of Formula 1 when Senna joined his team and the enmity that eventually developed between the two.

Senna knew he wanted to be a race car driver from an early age, starting with success racing go-karts.  Coming from a privileged Brazilian family, they indulged his desires, but as in anything, money and desire aren't enough.  You have to be good.  And Senna was very, very good.  He had the courage to push his car to its limits and the smarts to know how to plan his attack. But he was also arrogant and took risks, which didn't win him popularity amongst the other drivers. He didn't just want to win.  He wanted to win big, so it would humiliate the other drivers and show how much better he was than they were.  He was a perfectionaist whose perfectionism was perhaps his Achiles Heel. Likewise, like everything, there was a political game to be played in racing, and Senna didn't play that game, but he did occasionally play dirty.  As the rivalry between Prost and Senna grew, the two both engaged in some risky, dirty tricks, some of which are seen in this film.

Director Asif Kapadia has combined exciting racing footage with home videos and interviews to create a compelling tale of a man who was at the top of his game in Formula 1 racing.  I have to say that I am not a big sports fan, but I usually can manage knowledge of the main players in most sports, but I had not heard of this guy. But he was very, very big in the racing world in the late 1980's and early 1990's, a handsome, charismatic figure whose wins at a time when Brazil's economy was suffering, acted as a rallying symbol for the pride of the whole country until his tragic death at 34 in a freak racing accident that was seen on television by the entire world.

It is no secret that I am a fan of documentaries (I wrote about some favorites back in 2014 - "15 Must See Documentaries" - I should update that list because there have been some other great ones since then), but I would not necessarily be drawn to a documentary about race car drivers, though I will say that car racing was a theme in my life growing up.  My Dad and brother were big fans, even participating in drag racing, both at the track and on the street.  The film has amazing racing footage, some from Senna's own vantage point as he drove, and the narrative of the film is driven by the footage and Senna's and others' own words. 

As I said, I am not drawn to documentaries about racing, but ironically, Kapadia was the director of the kind of film I AM drawn to and one of my absolute favorites, "Amy," a documentary about Amy Winehouse, which won an Oscar for Best Documentary in 2016 and which would definitely be on my updated list of must-see documentaries.  So would this film.

Why it's a Must See: "Shakespearean in structure, the film tells the story of a man born to be crowned king of the world's fastest and most dangerous sport, only to die young and at the height of his success. A documentary constructed as a narrative drama, Senna eschews talking heads or omniscient narration in favor of an assemblage of archive footage that is sutured together to give a sense of immediacy...However, by focusing as much on Senna's flaws as it does on his achievements, Senna ultimately becomes a riveting profile of a unique and all-too-human character."
---"1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die"

"A documentary with the pace of a thriller...that is beyond compelling because of the intensely human story it tells."
---Kenneth Turan, LA Times 2011

I went into this movie not particularly interested in the subject matter and not knowing anything about Ayrton Senna and came out of it fascinated by the sport and the man.

Rosy the Reviewer says...exciting...and sad.




***Book of the Week***




A retelling of a horrible unsolved 1991 multiple murder in Austin Texas.

On December 6, 1991, four young girls were found naked, murdered and burned--each one shot in the head--in an I Can't Believe It's Yogurt! shop in Austin, Texas. After eight years only two men (then teenagers) were tried; moreover, their subsequent convictions were eventually overturned because of coerced false confessions and a misdirected focus on the part of the Austin police.  It happens over and over.  The police get an idea of how a murder went down and who did it and no matter what transpires, they stick to that theory to the detriment of the innocent and their families.

Austin PD detectives are still working on what is now a very cold case, and the TV show "48 Hours" has covered the case more than once, and its most recent airing drew me to this new book. I don't know what it is, but I am inexplicably drawn to the dark side. I should probably explore that side of myself some time, but in the meantime, I am enjoying the murder cases on "Dateline" and "48 Hours," as well as true crime books.  And this is a good one.

Lowry has put together a taut, engrossing true crime story that tells the story of each girl, the boys who were accused and the ill-fated focus of the police investigations on those boys, despite other possible suspects.  She weighs the evidence against the accused and speculates on what might have happened that fateful night that still haunts Austin and that has stymied Texas law enforcement agencies for so many years. 

Rosy the Reviewer says...true crime fans will find this a ghastly but fascinating account of a multiple murder that has haunted Austin for 26 years.


Thanks for reading!

 
See you Tuesday 

 
For installment #3 

of

"Rosy's Test Kitchen:
Cooking Successes and Cooking Conundrums" -

"Soup, Salad and a Sandwich"

(where I will not only share a killer soup and salad but will be presiding over
"The Battle of the Grilled Cheese Sandwiches!")



If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rosythereviewer


Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.


Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 

Go to IMDB.com, find the movie you are interested in.  Once there, click on the link that says "Explore More" on the right side of the screen.  Scroll down to External Reviews and when you get to that page, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.

NOTE:  On some entries, this has changed.  If you don't see "Explore More" on the right side of the screen, scroll down just below the description of the film in the middle of the page. Click where it says "Critics." Look for "Rosy the Reviewer" on the list.

Or if you are using a mobile device, look for "Critics Reviews." Click on that and you will find me alphabetically under "Rosy the Reviewer."


 
 
 
 
 
 

Friday, November 18, 2016

"Arrival" and The Week in Reviews

[I review the new movie "Arrival" as well as DVDs "The Legend of Tarzan" and "Indignation."  The Book of the Week is Jeffrey Toobin's take on the Patty Hearst kidnapping "American Heiress: The Wild Saga of the Kidnapping, Crimes and Trial of Patty Hearst."  I also bring you up-to-date on "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project" with the French classic "The Wages of Fear."]




Arrival


When 12 space ships land in various locations around the world, an American linguist is recruited to try to communicate with the aliens to discover why they have come.

Space ships that look like giant contact lenses have landed at various locations around the world.  There appears to be no rhyme or reason for why they landed where they did nor have the aliens inside announced why they have come or what they want. Task forces in all of the countries where a spaceship has landed have been formed and are in contact with one another, but each country differs on what should happen next.

Amy Adams plays Dr. Louise Banks, a college languages professor who, through a montage, we learn has lost her young daughter to a disease.  Louise lives alone and appears to be very lonely.  Because she is a leading linguist and had worked with the government before, when the space ships arrive, she is approached by Colonel Weber (Forest Whitaker) to be a part of the task force to try to communicate with the aliens.  She and scientist Ian Donnelly (Jeremy Renner) are transported to Montana, where the spaceship has landed in the U.S. and the U.S. military has set up camp.

The aliens don't appear to be hostile and allow the humans to board the spaceship every 18 hours for a 90 minute session with them behind a transparent wall, but since the humans don't speak alien and the aliens don't speak human, these have not been very productive sessions.  Hence we have Louise. 

The aliens are heptapods, which means they have seven legs and look like very tall jellyfish. They communicate by throwing out circular symbols, each circle being just enough different to indicate different words.

Louise starts the arduous task of trying to communicate with the aliens and to break the code of their language.  She holds up a sign that says "Human," points to herself, holds up another sign that says "Louise," points to herself, that kind of thing, and through these painstaking methods, Louise and Ian are able to begin to crack the aliens' language code and communicate with them.  However, it's a very slow process and they still don't have the vocabulary to find out why the aliens have come. 

For a time, all of the countries work together, but as time goes by, the other countries, who have also been trying to communicate with their particular aliens, are getting antsy, and, when one of the communications from the aliens seems to use the word "weapon," China decides it is time to blow their spaceship up.  Time is of the essence and the pressure is on Louise and Ian to avoid a war against the aliens, with whom Louise and Ian have formed a bond, and who they have dubbed "Abbott and Costello."

With a screenplay by Eric Heisserer (based on the short story "Story of Your Life" by Ted Chiang which won a Nebula Award for Best Novella in 2000) and directed by Denis Villeneuve, who directed the well-received "Prisoners" and "Sicario," this is not your typical alien invasion film.  If you are expecting an "Independence Day" type of alien film or even "Close Encounters of a Third Kind (which this film resembles early on), you might be disappointed.

Yes, this film is about spaceships and aliens...but it's much more that. This is more of an intellectual film and more of a sincere human story, more of Louise's story and what she learned about herself while working with the aliens. It's about loss and grief and time and the future and will have you reaching for a hankie at the end. 

However, despite the sincerity of this film, I have to say that I was disappointed, not because I was expecting a typical alien movie which is not my forte anyway, but because I found it to be too slow to get going, and it had too many "huh?" moments for me.  It also plays with time, and I am not a big fan of those kinds of movies, probably because I never understand them. I'm a very linear thinker or maybe I'm just not that smart. Whatever.  I can't say much more about the plot, or I will give it away, because there is a big payoff at the end that will tug at your heart strings, but for me, it just took too long to get there.

However, that said, I would venture to guess that Adams will get an Oscar nod for her performance, because it's very, very good, and Villeneuve could very well get a nod for his direction and/or the film could get a Best Picture nod because it's a beautifully made picture and lovely to look at.

Jeremy Renner is believable as the scientist foil for Louise and Forest Whitaker, is, well, Forest Whitaker.  Does that guy never smile?  I think he has always been like that.  When I saw "Fast Times at Ridgemont High" recently, where he played a high school football player in what looked to be one of his very first film roles, he didn't smile in that one either. 

Now, you might ask, how could I like a kind of silly film like "Mascots," which I reviewed last week, and gave a good review and have qualms about this one, a serious film with a message?  Well, here is my answer. 

First of all, I find Christopher Guest to be a brilliant satirist and commentator on popular culture, but that aside, I hold certain films to a higher standard than others.  My standard for a comedy?  Did I laugh?  My standard for a drama or message film?  Did it accomplish what it set out to do?  Did it move me?  In my opinion, this film did not. Though I could appreciate the acting and the production values, and though I felt something at the very end, most of the film left me cold, and it also left too much unexplained for my taste. 

But I certainly didn't hate it.  It just didn't blow me away like I think it wanted to.  However, others out there are raving about it and loved it, so I am not going to discourage you. I was in the minority on "The Martian" too, so this is one of those films I will not make a major pronouncement about and let you make up your own mind.

Rosy the Reviewer says...Amy Adams' performance is worth the price of a ticket, but as for the film experience, I am going to leave this one up to you. You will either love it or not, so let me know what you think


 
 

***Some Movies You Might Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)!

On DVD




The Legend of Tarzan (2016)


Tarzan (Alexander Skarsgaard) has already turned into a posh Londoner since being reunited with his family and his title as Lord Greystoke - real name John Clayton - (you remember he was brought up by apes, right?), but he is compelled to go back to his former home in the jungle to find out what is going on with some mining activities that threaten the environment and his friends.

It's 1884 and Tarzan is now living his rightful life as a lord of the manor in London with Jane after being discovered living amongst apes in Africa.  Remember?  There was a shipwreck, his mother dies, his father is killed by apes, but little baby Greystoke was rescued by a mama gorilla who raised him as her own. 

If you don't know that story, you get a bit of it in the film through flashbacks - the film jumps back and forth between Tarzan's life in the jungle and his life now - but that's mostly so we can see Skarsgaard with his shirt off.  It doesn't dwell much on the original story. So if you want to know more of the backstory, you should probably read the books or go back and see some of those old Johnny Weismuller films.  This film concentrates more on Tarzan's life after he was discovered living in the jungle so you won't get to hear him say, "Me Tarzan. You Jane."  I was very disappointed by that.

Anyway, Tarzan was brought up in the Belgian Congo (by apes, yada yada yada, we know all of that), and now the Belgian King Leopold who runs the Belgian Congo, is dead broke.  He sends his trusted advisor Leon Rom (Christoph Waltz (does he ever play anything but one note villains these days?) to the Congo to find a famous diamond which, if found, will solve the King's financial issues. When they arrive, Rom and members of the Belgian army engage with the natives, and Chief Mbonga (Djimon Hounsou), who doesn't like our Tarzan very much (in fact he hates him and we find out why later), tells Rom that he can have the diamond if he brings him Tarzan.  So Rom concocts a plan to lure Tarzan back to Africa. 

OK, I already have a question. 

How is it that Mbonga speaks English or can talk to Rom? 

Second question - why did Mbonga and his men kill all of the Belgian soldiers and not Rom? 

Obviously my mind is wandering, and I'm already starting to lose interest. 

Anyway, Rom lures Tarzan to the Congo by saying that the King has invited him to tour Africa.  At first Tarzan declines, but Dr. George Washington Williams (Samuel L. Jackson) just happens to be visiting from America and entreats John to go to help him find out if King Leopold is using slavery to keep the Congo running, because everyone knows he doesn't have a dime (this character is actually based on an actual person).  Dr. Williams goes with Tarzan, and so does Jane (Margot Robbie), who manages to talk Tarzan into letting her tag along, much to Rom's chagrin.  He thought Tarzan was going to be alone and easy pickins' but think again Mr. Rom!

Tarzan does get captured but escapes so then Rom kidnaps Jane and now the race is on to save Jane. Naturally Rom lusts after Jane and when she struggles he tells her he admires her spirit. 

Question #3: Why is it that movie bad guys, who lust after beautiful heroines, always say they admire the women's spirit while the women are struggling, spitting in their faces and trying to kick them in the you-know-whats? You would think they would prefer women who wouldn't be such a problem.

Anyway, those kinds of cartoon clichés abound.

However, on the up side, we also get to see Tarzan swinging from the trees and running really fast like the Six Million Dollar Man.  The trio does discover the slaves and when they are finally confronted by Mbonga, Williams entreats him to join forces with them to try to ruin Rom's plans and you can probably figure out how it's all going to go. All in all, nothing new here.

I liked Skarsgaard in "Diary of a Teenage Girl," so he's a good actor with a lovely accent but here his performance is so wooden he sounds like Liam Neeson (in his "Taken" films) playing The Rock

Question #4: So I have to ask. Alex, can I call you that?  What happened?

Robbie is gorgeous as usual and is always good, but doesn't get to do much here.  Samuel L. Jackson actually smiles benignly, as if he is really happy, which kind of shocked me.  I was trying to remember if I have ever seen him truly happy in a film, in a good way (as in not evil gloating). 

Question #5:  Sam, have I?

Directed by David Yates, there is a score that is lush and moody -- almost too lush and moody - and the set design and cinematography are all very dark and atmospheric.  The CGI animals are impressive: there is a wild buffalo stampede, alligators, gorillas, lionesses who Tarzan gets to nuzzle (old friends of Tarzan's). Everyone and everything gets into the act. So the movie is pretty to look at, but that's not enough to save the story itself, written by Craig Brewer and Adam Cozad, which is pretty preposterous. 

But to be fair, this is one of those films that I think was meant to be seen in a movie theatre where you could revel in all of that CGI and beautiful jungle scenery and Skarsgaard's abs and not think too much about the story.  It wasn't meant to be seen on the small screen in our living rooms. 

(Yates is most famous for directing many of the Harry Potter films, which I enjoyed, and most recently the Harry Potter prequel "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them," which opens in theatres today and which I also hope I will enjoy because I am reviewing it here next week).

But here is my main question: Why did we need another Tarzan movie?  And if we are going to have another one, where is Cheeta

Rosy the Reviewer says...if you love all things Tarzan, you might enjoy this, but I have to ask again: Did we really need another Tarzan movie?






Indignation (2016)


Marcus Messner (Logan Lerman), a young working-class Jewish boy from New Jersey, has a scholarship to a Midwestern college and is able to escape the draft for the Korean War but can't escape cultural differences and his own sexual repression.

The film begins in a nursing home where a woman is sitting in a catatonic state.

Flashback to a battlefield in Korea where an American soldier is being pursued by a Korean soldier.  Shots are fired.

Flashback yet again for the funeral of a young Jewish soldier in a Jewish community in Newark, New Jersey. Marcus Messner is attending the fumeral with his family.  He is a sheltered Jewish boy getting ready to go off to college in Ohio on scholarship, thus saving him from being drafted into the Korean War. His mother worries that he won't be able to keep kosher there and his father, the local butcher, worries that he will get into trouble cautioning him that the tiniest misstep can lead to tragedy. The pressure is on for Marcus to hold up his end of the family name.

Marcus is all work and no play, even shunning the Jewish fraternity that wants him.  But then he meets Olivia Hutton (Sarah Gadon), a beautiful blonde girl who is actually interested in him.  Olivia is far more worldly than Marcus and when they go on a date and she performs a sex act on him, he is shocked, judges her and ultimately tries to avoid her, starting a chain of events that show the kinds of sexual repression at work in the 1950's.  Because she did that with him, she must have done it with other boys, right? Olivia is beautiful and worldly, but it becomes clear that she is fragile. She admits to Marcus that she had tried to commit suicide and spent some time in a mental hospital.

When Marcus gets in a fight with his roommates, he asks for a single room, which leads Dean Caldwell (Tracy Letts) to meet with Marcus because he is worried about his isolation and fitting in poorly, a clear nod to the cultural differences at work here. Marcus is indignant that the Dean would dare lecture him and challenges the Dean, saying he has the right to socialize or not.  They also argue about religion (there is a requirement at the college that all students attend 10 chapels per year and Marcus bridles at this because he is an atheist), and the two develop an adversarial relationship where the Dean stands for the rules of the college and the mores of the times and Marcus stands for the freedom to choose one's own way in the world. 

Unfortunately, this adversarial relationship and the seemingly small choices that Marcus makes leads to tragedy, reminding us of what Marcus's father cautioned him about.  At the end of the film, we learn who the woman in the nursing home is, and that she is not catatonic, she is remembering.

Based on a book by Philip Roth and written for the screen and directed by James Schamus, the film feels more like an Arthur Miller play than a movie, but that's not a bad thing. This is a coming of age tale indicative of Roth's usual themes of religion, the sexual mores of the 50's and 60's and the difficulties in connecting to others. 

The actors are largely young unknowns, though Lerman made his mark as Percy Jackson and later in "Fury."  He is one of those actors who underplays and seems like a young Dustin Hoffman in "The Graduate." He is very endearing.  Sarah Gadon as Olivia is also wonderful.

My only complaint: Why is it that when a male writer or filmmaker wants to show us a damaged girl in the 1950's, she almost always shows her angst by being sexually promiscuous? I'm just asking. 

Rosy the Reviewer says...a lovely small film, beautifully acted and presented, that will remind you of "Atonement."



 

***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***
 




226 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?





Wages of Fear (1953)


In a dusty South American town, four men are recruited to transport barrels of nitroglycerin over treacherous roads.

Unemployed men from various parts of Europe populate an unnamed South American town. Yves Montand is Mario, a Frenchman, who spends his days sitting around talking with other expats, drinking, trying to make a buck here and there and flirting with the local floozy, Linda (Vera Clouzot), who appears to be the only young woman in the whole town and the only one who is overacting like mad (it should be noted that Vera is the director's wife so that explains a lot.  But I will give her a pass.  It was her first film). 

One day Jo (Charles Vanel) arrives by plane, and being another French guy, he and Mario quickly become friends.  Jo is on the run from something and hopped the first plane that would take him $500's-worth away from where he was.  Both Jo and Mario are dead broke, so they try to figure out how to make some money and no matter if it's illegal or not. 

Meanwhile, a big fire breaks out in an American oil field 300 miles away. Bill O'Brien (William Tubbs), the American owner of the local oil business, needs some men to drive some nitroglycerin over a mountain pass to the burning oil field so the workers can set off dynamite to staunch the fires.  Mario and Jo are first in line.  It's a dangerous trip over 300 miles of rugged, mountainous roads where the slightest bump could explode the nitro.  The trip needs to be done quickly and, despite the danger, the men in this town are desperate and willing to risk their lives to make this trek for the money.  And O'Brien is happy to exploit these men because they are considered expendable if something bad happens - "No one will come around causing trouble."

Two trucks will make the journey with two men in each truck.  Mario and Jo are in the first largest truck, with two other lost souls, Bimba (Peter Van Eyck) and Luigi (Folco Lilli), following as back-up in another.  As Jo tries to start the truck, it won't start, clearly an omen of what's to come. T

Thus begins the second half of the film: the tense journey with all kinds of obstacles that need to be overcome.

I am constantly amazed and happy by this little (or big) project I have undertaken (to see all of the movies in the book "1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die"), because I am introduced to some really wonderful movies I would never have necessarily wanted to see...and this would be one of them.  As I always say, I don't really like movies about a bunch of men doing manly stuff, but I have to say this film is riveting.  The characterizations are superb (except for Linda) as is the script, and the black and white cinematography is exquisite.

For a two and a half hour movie about guys driving trucks on a dangerous South American road, the film moved along fast and furious and kept my attention throughout.  The ominous music added to the tension and you find yourself rooting for these guys, even though they are not very nice guys, but you do it because they are clearly being exploited (by American oil interests) because of their desperation. The suspense lies in the question, "Will they make it?" And with the money they will make, will they get out of that hell hole of a town?  Where will they go?  What will they do?  Will they turn their lives around? Or will it all be for nothing?"

This showcases some of Yves Montand's early work before he became known as a suave leading man. This role is a far cry from the French bon vivant he became in romantic comedies where he romanced Marilyn Monroe and then broke her heart, and it's a wonderful performance.

(Director William Friedkin remade this film in 1977 ("Sorcerer"), once again getting my dander up about American remakes of perfectly wonderful foreign language films. Difficult to believe that remake could be as wonderful as this film...and it wasn't).

Why it's a Must See: "A withering depiction of greed and the corrupting influence of capitalism disguised as an adventure film, Henri-Georges Clouzot's Wages of Fear is possibly the most tension-filled movie ever made."
---"1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die"

Rosy the Reviewer says...if you like beautifully made, tense macho films with lots of twists and turns (literally), or even if you are just a fan of TV shows like "Ice Road Truckers," this is for you.  You will find this film fascinating. 
(b & w, in English, French and Italian with English subtitles)


 

***Book of the Week***





American Heiress: The Wild Saga of the Kidnapping, Crimes and Trial of Patty Hearst by Jeffrey Toobin (2016)


On February 4, 1974 Patricia Campbell Hearst, a sophomore at U.C. Berkeley and heir to the Hearst family fortune, was kidnapped by the Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA), a group of self-styled revolutionaries. Her kidnapping and later decision to become one of them gripped the nation. 

Patty Hearst was engaged to a college professor and living a quiet life when she was kidnapped by the SLA.  Over the course of her capture, she appeared to go over to the side of the revolutionaries and become one of them. She put out communiques to the press calling herself Tania (after Che Guevara's lover and fellow revolutionary) and was seen holding a sawed-off shot gun during a robbery of a San Francisco bank. The group demanded that her father, Randy Hearst, feed the poor people of Oakland and San Francisco to secure her release. He did but Patricia was not released.

When most of the members of the group were killed in the largest police shoot-out in American history and the first breaking news event to be broadcast on live television across the country, Patty and the two remaining SLA members, Bill and Emily Harris, went on the run, helped by other ragtag left-wing groups, until they were all captured a year later.  When Patty was captured, she went on trial for her perceived crimes. Though when she was captured she was unrepentant, spouting radical rhetoric, she later said she had been forced to cooperate with the SLA. Was she a victim of the Stockholm Syndrome or a willing participant in the crimes the group perpetrated?

Jeffrey Toobin, whose book about O.J. was the basis for the Emmy Award- winning miniseries "The People vs. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story" turns his excellent eye and writing narrative to the story of Patty Hearst and her involvement with the SLA.  Based on more than 100 interviews and thousands of previously secret documents, this book captures the radical nature of the times (there were an average of 1500 terrorist bombings a year in the 1970's - so many that the news media stopped reporting on them).

Many of you are too young to remember this event, but no doubt you recognize the name. The story was a headline one for many years.  Did Patty become an SLA member on her own or was she brainwashed or coerced?  That is the question Toobin tackles.  He also brings us all up to date on what Patty's life has been like since her capture and trial and his views on the Presidential pardon she received in the 1990's.

I was living in Berkeley at the time of the infamous shoot-out and watched in real time on TV.  It was shocking but also a time when many young people were sympathetic to these kinds of self proclaimed revolutionaries, especially in Berkeley, so it was extremely interesting to relive it all 42 years later with more facts and insight than we all had back then.

I favor nonfiction, especially well written nonfiction, and Toobin is right up there with the best. 

His research is excellent, starting with Hearst's own book "Every Secret Thing," followed by his reading all of the trial testimony and FBI summaries, his viewing press interviews and media appearances and directly interviewing people who knew Patty or who played a major role in the events.  After his release from prison, Bill Harris had obtained the legal and investigative files from the defense teams in all of the prosecutions of the remaining SLA members and their associates, and Toobin was able to purchase those files from Harris.  Those files comprised over 150 boxes of material.

This is no puff piece about Patricia Hearst or an apologist view of the SLA. 

In fact, Toobin appears to not be a fan. Needless to say, Hearst did not cooperate in the publication of the book, though Toobin tried to contact her.  He is also clearly not in support of the Presidential pardon Hearst received in the 1990's. 

"Patricia Hearst was a woman who, through no fault of her own, fell in with bad people but then did bad things; she committed crimes, lots of them...To be sure, following her arrest in 1975, she was unlikely to commit these kinds of crimes again.  If the United States were a country that routinely forgave the trespasses of such people, there would be little remarkable about the mercy she received following her conviction.  But the United States is not such a country; the prisons teem with convicts who were also led astray and who committed lesser crimes than Patricia.  These unfortunate souls have no chance at even a single act of clemency...Rarely have the benefits of wealth, power, and renown been as clear as they were in the aftermath of Patricia's conviction."

Where is Patricia Hearst today? 

Today she is 62, a mother and a grandmother and a widow who likes to show dogs.  Her shih tzu named Rocket won top dog in the toy division at the Westminster Dog Show in 2015.

And such is life.

Rosy the Reviewer says...Baby Boomers will remember this story and Toobin does it justice, vividly bringing it back to life and giving the events context.  Nonfiction at its best.  Highly recommended!



Thanks for reading!
 
See you next Friday 

 
for my review of
 

"Moonlight"

 
and 

  
The Week in Reviews

(What to See or Read and What to Avoid)


 and the latest on



"My 1001 Movies I Must See Before 

 I Die Project." 

 

 
If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rosythereviewer


Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.

 

Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 

Go to IMDB.com, find the movie you are interested in.  Once there, click on the link that says "Explore More" on the right side of the screen.  Scroll down to External Reviews and when you get to that page, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.

NOTE:  On some entries, this has changed.  If you don't see "Explore More" on the right side of the screen, scroll down just below the description of the film in the middle of the page. Click where it says "Critics." Look for "Rosy the Reviewer" on the list.

Or if you are using a mobile device, look for "Critics Reviews." Click on that and you will find me alphabetically under "Rosy the Reviewer."