Friday, January 15, 2016

"Carol" and The Week in Reviews

[I review the new movie "Carol" as well as DVDS "Dark Places" and "Best of Enemies."  The Book of the Week is Giada De Laurentiis' new cookbook. I also bring you up-to-date on My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project" with "Buffalo '66"]



Before I start on this week's reviews, I do want to follow up on how I did with my Oscar Nomination Predictions from last Tuesday.  

Nominations were announced yesterday and I did pretty well with my predictions, though there were some surprises. Other than Cate Blanchett's performance, "Carol" was shut out from Best Picture and Best Director, which was quite shocking considering Director Todd Haynes and the film were nominated for Golden Globes and his 2003 movie "Far From Heaven" was nominated for four Oscars and won one.

I called the Best Actor category. For Best Actress, Charlotte Rampling was chosen instead of Alicia Vikander in that category and Helen Mirren was shut out for Best supporting actress in favor of Rachel McAdams for "Spotlight," which is a crime. Vikander was nominated in the Best Supporting Actress category which is silly because her role was a lead role. Christian Bale got the nom for Best Supporting Actor instead of Idris Elba, making this the "whitest" Academy Award year as predicted. 

Since there were only 8 Best Picture nominations, I got those all right but somehow left off "The Martian," which I didn't mean to do - must have been subconscious since I didn't really like it.

And I missed two out of the 5 Best Directors. Lenny Abramson for "Room" was a surprise, especially since Ridley Scott was shut out for "The Martian." So as I said, there are always some surprises despite what happens at the Golden Globes.

See you at the Oscars!
 
 

Now on to The Week in Reviews!





Carol



In 1950's New York City, a young aspiring photographer falls for an older woman.

Ah, the 1950's, when men and women wore hats, smoked anywhere they liked and had creamed spinach, poached eggs and a martini for lunch.  Women wore gloves and, unashamedly, mink coats. There were tea dances and everyone minded their manners.  We look back at the 1950's with nostalgia as a simpler time when our children could play safely out of our sight, women could go out alone at night and everyone was doing what they were supposed to do.  Problems were few and if there were any, heaven forbid, you didn't talk about them.

But, of course, now we know that was key.  Just because we didn't talk about problems, it didn't mean there weren't any.  Of course, there was divorce in the 1950's and child abductions and murders and rapes and, homosexuality, but we didn't talk about all of that like we do today on social media.  Today, nothing is a secret, but in the buttoned-up 1950's, there were many secrets behind the prim and proper facade.

Director Todd Haynes is a master at capturing the look and feel of period pieces, especially the 1950's, and the secrets, repressed sexuality and forbidden love that was simmering below the surface in lush films that themselves hark back to the lush melodramas of Douglas Sirk ("Imitation of Life," "Magnificent Obsession").

Here Haynes directs an adaptation of Patricia Highsmith's novel "The Price of Salt," a classic in LGBT literature (adapted for the screen by Phyllis Nagy). Like his "Far from Heaven (which was nominated for several Academy Awards in 2003), this is a story about forbidden love set in the 1950's, though this time instead of interracial love, it is love between two women.

Carol Aird (Cate Blanchett) is a socialite in the midst of a divorce from her wealthy husband,  Harge (Kyle Chandler).  While in a department store looking for a gift for her five-year-old daughter, Carol meets Therese (pronounced "Teress") Belivet (Rooney Mara), a salesgirl at the store.  Therese is struck by Carol's style and beauty.  Carol accidentally leaves her gloves on the counter, and when Therese mails them back to her, Carol calls her and asks her to lunch to thank her.

As the film unfolds, we learn that Carol's husband does not want a divorce and that he suspects Carol's preference for women.  Likewise, Therese, though engaged to Richard (Jake Lacy), is struggling with her confusion about her sexuality. Carol's husband informs her he is going to take her daughter away from her if she doesn't come back to him, so Carol and Therese leave it all behind and embark on a road trip together, not realizing how they will have to pay for this bit of rebellion.  In the 1950's, you always had to pay for breaching the social mores.

Blanchett is wonderful in this film.  She doesn't exhibit any of her sometimes over the top, Joan Crawford-like mannerisms.  She is luminous and sympathetic.  Likewise, Mara is channeling a young Audrey Hepburn, eyebrows and all.  The two are believable lovers.  There is irony in the title of this film because the movie is more about Therese and her coming to grips with her lesbianism than it is about Carol herself, who though closeted, has already accepted her sexual preference.

Though beautifully photographed by Edward Lachman (nominated this year for an Oscar), who also worked with Haynes on "Far from Heaven," with art direction by Jesse Rosenthall, set design by Heather Loeffler and costumes by Academy Award Costumer Designer Sandy Powell (who is also nominated for an Oscar this year), this film is not as beautiful and dreamy as "Heaven."  And though an engrossing, important story, well acted by Blanchett and Mara, it also is somehow, not as compelling.

Rosy the Reviewer says...See it to be transported back to another time and for two great performances.



 
***Some Movies You Might Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)

Now Out on DVD






Dark Places (2015)



Libby Day's mother and sisters were murdered in their Kansas farmhouse when she was eight and she was the only witness. She said her brother did it.  But did he? 

It's 30 years later and Libby (Charlize Theron) is not doing very well.  She doesn't have a job and has been living off of donations from sympathetic strangers that came in starting when she was an eight-year-old orphan.  Her brother, Ben (Corey Stoll), is in jail for killing her family.  Libby is now a tough woman with no prospects. 

She gets a letter from Lyle Wirth (Nicholas Hoult), asking her to make a public appearance at a club he belongs to - "The Kill Club."  The club is a bunch of people who like true crimes and mysteries and they are obsessed with the murder of her family.  She doesn't want to do it but needs the money and negotiates a $700 fee to go to the meeting and let the club members "pick her brain" about the crime.

As Libby prepares for this meeting, in a series of flashbacks, her mind shifts back and forth between events leading up to the murders, trying to remember what she has tried to forget.

When Libby arrives at the meeting, it becomes apparent that the members do not think her brother, Ben, killed her mother and sisters.  So they have really lured Libby to the meeting so she will recant her testimony that fingered Ben. They are passionate that Ben is innocent and as the window for appeals is soon going to close, they want Libby to help them free Ben.

Now Libby is haunted even more by the events of that night and as she forces herself to go back to that place, she begins to question herself, and what really happened that night begins to reveal itself.

The family lived a hardscrabble life on the family farm, and Libby's mother (Christina Hendricks) was about to lose the farm.  This figures later in one of the most bizarre plot twists ever.

As a teen, Ben had a goth look and hung around with unsavory types, so naturally, it being the 80's when young, disaffected youth with piercings and Doc Martens were suspected of worshiping the devil, Ben was arrested.  
(There is a parallel here with the documentary "Paradise Lost," about the three innocent young men convicted of killing some young boy scouts mostly because they were town outcasts who looked goth and were perceived as being devil worshipers). 

Ben's girlfriend, Diondra (Chloe Grace Moretz) is a rich girl with a dark side.  There is an unsettling scene where she and her brother, Trey, get Ben to help them kill a bunch of cows in some kind of drug-induced frenzy.

Based on the novel by Gillian Flynn, whose "Gone Girl" was such a hit, this plays like a gothic melodrama - but a good one, despite many red herrings and some implausible plot twists, but hey, life can be like that.  Directed by Gilles Paquet-Brenner (he also adapted the screenplay), it's like a Dateline version of "In Cold Blood," and I love Dateline mysteries and I loved "In Cold Blood." 

On the negative side, there is a far-fetched, bizarre conclusion to the mystery, but despite that, the film does draw you in and you really want to find out what happened that night.   

It's strange that this film got buried with all of the star power in it and with a book by Gillian Flynn.  Charlize, though the star, doesn't really have that much to do except act tough and try to look plain with no make-up, but with those cheek bones, she still looks like a beautiful actress trying not to look beautiful.

Rosy the Reviewer says...it's not "Gone Girl, but if you like "Dateline," you will enjoy this.






Best of Enemies (2015)

 


A documentary about the series of debates between arch conservative William F. Buckley Jr. and very liberal Gore Vidal during the 1968 Presidential Conventions.

We had confidence in TV news in the 1960's - remember Huntley and Brinkley and Walter Cronkite?  People gathered in front of their TVs together to get the latest news from these trusted newscasters. 

Also remember when there were only three networks? 

In 1968 ABC was relatively new and was considered the 3rd station after CBS and NBC.  In those days, TV covered the Democratic and Republican Presidential Conventions 24/7, and ABC needed something to compete, so they got this "brilliant" idea to pair Buckley and Vidal together in a series of debates during the conventions. Debates is using the word loosely.  In actuality, they were more like a series of insults and one upmanships.  And it changed television news forever.

The two were as opposite politically as you could get - and already hated each other.

William F. Buckley was a well-known conservative who had started the "National Review," hosted the TV show "Firing Line" and was also was a fixture on late night talk shows.  Likewise, Vidal was a best-selling author (his "Myra Breckinridge" had just been published) and outspoken liberal with ties to Jackie Kennedy.  They were both bluebloods with no compunction whatsoever about insulting each other personally. So as they "debated," the argument became more about who was the better person, not politics, culminating in Vidal calling Buckley a "crypto-Nazi" and Buckley hurling a gay epithet and threatening to punch Vidal in the face.  Great TV!

It is also not lost on the viewer of this documentary that the reason people watched these two "debate," was not necessarily for anything newsworthy, but because it was so showbiz. More than discussing real issues, they insulted each other and called each other names, their rage simmering below the surface.  Not too different from the talking heads we see every day on Fox News.

It is fascinating and hilarious to see these two go at it and what the issues of the day were. Sadly, not much different from today.  When Vidal said that 5% of the people had the most wealth and 5% were in the lowest bracket, it is upsetting to think that it is WORSE today!

Buckley represented someone who wanted to hang on to the wealthy social order; Vidal, though wealthy himself, was a socialist, and they were both intellectuals.  Despite the insults, television rarely has these kinds of programs where intellectuals sit around and talk. I miss that.

Directed by Robert Gordon and Morgan Neville, who gave us the Academy Award-winning documentary "20 Feet From Stardom," the film employs voice-overs from Kelsey Grammer and John Lithgow as Buckley and Vidal respectively who read from their writings to give some perspective on how they later felt about the debates.

Rosy the Reviewer says...a funny but sad harbinger of what was to come regarding TV news and a reminder that we don't talk the same language anymore (and this should have been nominated for a Best Documentary Oscar, but sadly was not).



 
***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***
 



265 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?




Buffalo '66 (1998)



Billy Brown has just gotten out of jail but wants his parents to believe he has been away working for the government.  On his way to visit his parents in Buffalo, he kidnaps a young girl and gets her to pretend to be his wife.

Vincent Gallo wrote, directed and starred in this very indie black comedy about Billy Brown, a loser of a guy from Buffalo whose mother (Angelic Huston) is obsessed with the Buffalo Bills and whose Dad (Ben Gazzara) is a bit of a perv. 

The film starts out with a funny sequence with Billy getting out of jail and there is no one to pick him up.  He waits and waits and finally has to go to the toilet so badly that he goes back to the prison to ask if he can use the restroom.  Nope.  Once you are out, you're out!  A bus ride later and the toilet in the bus station is closed, no restaurant will let him use theirs and he eventually ends up in a dance studio where he meets Layla (Christina Ricci).  I guess having to go to the toilet really bad can make you really mean.  He kidnaps her and forces her to accompany him to his parents' house to pretend she is his wife and "make him look good."  How he does this with no weapon was the first thing that made me question this film.

Why had Billy been in jail?  He had placed a $10,000 bet on the Buffalo Bills with money he didn't have. The bookie (Mickey Rourke) will forgive the loan if Billy will take a rap for someone else and serve his time in prison.  He does that but when he gets out of prison Billy is determined to take revenge, not on the bookie, but on the Buffalo Bills' placekicker who lost the game!

The film uses a series of split screens for flashbacks and to show the inner life of the characters, which was kind of interesting.  And in addition to Gazzara, Rourke, and Huston, Rosanna Arquette, Jan Michael-Vincent also make appearances.  Gallo called this his "masterpiece," which is kind of strange since his body of work isn't that vast or well-known.  He also says the film was autobiographical and typified his awful family life growing up.

Why it's a Must See:  "Wonderfully quirky stuff, this low-budget bizarre romance boasts suitably eccentric performances...Gallo, meanwhile, multitasks superbly (he even wrote the film's music and used his parents' Buffalo home as the main location), delivering an ironic look at relationships and disillusionment with a variety of visual styles and images."
---"1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die"

I think the operative words here are "quirky," "bizarre," "eccentric" and let me add "I didn't get it."  It's one thing to be quirky, but it's another thing when none of the characters are sympathetic.  Billy is morose and mean, his parents are awful and Layla is an idiot.  What's to like?

Rosy the Reviewer says...I could have missed this one.



***Book of the Week***




Happy Cooking: Make Every Meal Count...Without Stressing Out by Giada De Laurentiis (2015)


Healthy, easy-to-prepare, stress-free food from one of the Food Network's biggest stars.

Thank goodness for cookbooks! Reviewing a cookbook is also a way for me to not stress out about my blog, so thank you, Giada!

I actually enjoy "reading" cookbooks and this one has not only recipes but all kinds of tips to make your cooking experience more enjoyable.

But yet another cookbook by Giada? Isn't Giada rich enough by now?  But this actually is quite a good one.

Here she gives us 200 more recipes but along with the usual ideas for breakfast, lunch and dinner, she also adds some advice on hosting a pot luck, cool things to pack for lunch, a chapter on "eating clean," and some menus and recipes for special holidays.

One of my favorites was her "Overnight Oats."  No cooking involved, you just put all of the ingredients together the night before and wake up to some tasty oatmeal you can grab and go!

1 c. rolled oats
1 T chia seeds
1 1/4 unsweetened almond mil
1/2 t pure vanilla extract
1/4 t ground cinnamon
1 T pure maple syrup

Then when you get up the morning, throw in the berries or stone fruit and some chopped or slivered raw almonds.  Yum!

Other winners are her "Better Wedge Salad" where she substitutes radicchio and romaine for iceberg lettuce and smoked almonds for bacon (though since when can almonds take the place of bacon?) and her "Bottom of the Box" pasta.  You know when recipes call for 12 ounces of pasta and most pasta comes in 16 ounce packages?  Then you have all of these little bags of 4 ounces or less of pasta sitting in your pantry?  Well, she says, just boil them all up together for a pasta dish with all kinds of little shapes.  The kids will love it!

There are also several vegetarian options like her "Slow Cooker Lentil, Kale, and Mushroom Soup" and her "Dairy-Free Risotto with Mushroom and Peas."

As always, this cookbook is slick with wonderful pictures of the food (and Giada too, of course, with her big toothy smile)!

Rosy the Reviewer says...a nice addition to your cookbook collection (or get it from your local library)!

 
 
That's it for this week.


Thanks for Reading!



See You Tuesday for



"How Self Aware Are You...Really?"
(A bit of a rant)


If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rosythereviewer

Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.


Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 

Go to IMDB.com, find the movie you are interested in.  Once there, click on the link that says "Explore More" on the right side of the screen.  Scroll down to External Reviews and when you get to that page, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.
NOTE:  On some entries, this has changed.  If you don't see "Explore More" on the right side of the screen, scroll down just below the description of the film in the middle of the page.  Find where it says "Reviews" and click on "Critics." Look for "Rosy the Reviewer" on the list.
Or if you are using a mobile device, look for "Critics Reviews." Click on that and you will find me alphabetically under "Rosy the Reviewer."



Tuesday, January 12, 2016

My Oscar Nomination Predictions 2016 (and some thoughts on the Golden Globes)

It's Oscar Time, the Super Bowl Season for movie lovers, and Oscar nominations for movies released in 2015 will be announced this Thursday, January 14th. 



Naturally, Rosy the Reviewer has to also weigh in, so let's see how well I do calling who will get nominated in the big categories of Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Supporting Actor and Actress, Best Director and Best Picture.  I will also make some predictions about Best Documentary and Best Animated Feature.

Though I haven't seen all of the films, I think I know enough about the Academy and popular taste to make some educated guesses, so here goes.

But before I do, you might be thinking, how hard is that for you to make your nomination predications?  The Golden Globes were last Sunday.  We know who was nominated for those and who won.  And because of that, you might think this whole Academy Award thing is now a slam dunk.  Think again.

You may have forgotten that last year the Hollywood Foreign Press voted "Boyhood" as Best Picture while the Academy Award went to "Birdman." 
(The Golden Globes got that one right, in my opinion)!



And who can forget Michael Keaton, who was the front runner for an Oscar for Best Actor and who had already won a Golden Globe, starting to take his speech out of his jacket pocket when the Best Actor nominations were read, only to have to put it back when Eddie Redmayne's name was read.

Likewise, in a very controversial year, the 2004 Academy Award for Best Picture went to "Crash," while the Golden Globe went to "Brokeback Mountain."  "Crash" didn't even receive any Golden Globe nominations at all and was a film many people thought was cheesy and they hated it.  And Brie Larson, an almost unknown actress, winning a Golden Globe for Best Actress over the mighty and heralded Cate Blanchett last Sunday was a major upset, that may or may not be repeated on Academy Award night.

So it's still anybody's game, and surprises are in store, especially when you consider that the Golden Globes divides the Best Picture and Best Actress and Actor nominations into Comedy and Drama. I have to whittle Best Actress and Actor Oscar nominations down to five.  

The controversy this year at the Golden Globes was "The Martian" in the comedy category. Kind of a sneaky way to ensure a win, I think.  I mean, c'mon, "The Martian" vs. "Spy?"  As much as I enjoyed "Trainwreck" and "Spy," those films can't compete with a Ridley Scott directed film starring Matt Damon, and you won't see those films nominated for an Academy Award, either, even though it looks like the Academy is still nominating up to 10 films (I thought they were going back to nominating only five, but I guess I was wrong). Comedies always get short shrift at the Oscars.

So coming up with my list of Academy Award nominees is not that easy!

And yes, the Golden Globes are fun (and this year it seemed to be particularly booze-filled with f-bombs all over the place), but who in the hell are the Hollywood Foreign Press, anyway?  I can remember a time when the Golden Globes were laughable and were rumored that they could be bought (the studio that spent the most money campaigning usually won - that was the rumor).  Denzel actually alluded to that on Sunday's show when he was honored with the Cecil B. DeMille Award (and if you have to ask who was Cecil B. DeMille? - you cannot call yourself a serious movie fan). Winning a Golden Globe is fine but ask any actor.  The Holy Grail is winning an Oscar.  Hands down.

However, in recent years, the Golden Globes have gained some gravitas and are seen as a precursor to what will happen at the Academy Awards.  However, the Academy skews older and more traditional.  We shall see.  I guarantee you some surprises are in store.

So let's get to it.



Best Actor
 
 

Leo DiCaprio, "The Revenant"              Michael Fassbender, "Steve Jobs"
Eddie Redmayne, "The Danish Girl"        Bryan Cranston, "Trumbo"
Matt Damon, "The Martian"

You all know I am totally in Eddie Redmayne's corner for a second Best Actor Oscar for "The Danish Girl." 

However, with Leo's win at the Golden Globes, I am thinking it's his year.  Though I think freezing cold weather, grunting a lot and fighting a bear does not compete with Eddie transforming himself into a woman, Leo has been screwed out of the Oscar so many times in the past, that I think it's his year. 

The Golden Globes opens up the playing field by nominating Best Actor and Actress in two categories:  Comedy and Drama.  So ten actors are nominated instead of only five by the Academy.  So sorry, Will Smith, you didn't make it into my top five for "Concussion," your accent not withstanding.  I had to cut you to  add Matt Damon, who won a Best Actor Golden Globe in the comedy category.  Everyone was shaking their heads about "The Martian" being a comedy. I wanted to add Michael B. Jordan for "Creed" to the mix, but I don't think he will make the cut.




Best Actress
 
 

Cate Blanchett, "Carol"                            Brie Larson, "Room"
Saoirse Ronan, "Brooklyn"                    Jennifer Lawrence, "Joy"
Alicia Vikander, "The Danish Girl"

The Academy has a bad habit of nominating lead actresses in the Best Supporting Actress category instead of Best Actress, thus almost assuring a win. The studios try to manipulate this to assure a win for their nominee. That's what I think will happen this year with Rooney Mara in "Carol," that she will be nominated in the Best Supporting Actress category, so she doesn't have to compete with Cate Blanchett.  Otherwise, I agree with the Golden Globe nominations for Best Actress in a drama, though Brie Larson's win over Cate Blanchett was a huge upset as Blanchett was considered a shoo-in.  I was surprised the camera didn't zoom in on Blanchett after Larson's name was announced.  I am sure she was as shocked as everyone else! 

Again, the Golden Globes divided Best Actress nominations into two categories, comedy and drama.  Jennifer Lawrence won for "Joy," again, hardly a comedy, so my adding her to my top five actresses for an Academy Award nod knocks Lily Tomlin, who the Globes had nominated in the comedy category, out of the running.  And Amy Schumer and Melissa McCarthy, though very funny in "Trainwreck" and "Spy," respectively, and who were nominated for Golden Globes in the comedy category can't compete with my top five.

 
 


Best Supporting Actress
 
 

Rooney Mara, "Carol"                                Helen Mirren, "Trumbo"
Kate Winslet, "Steve Jobs"                      Jane Fonda, "Youth"
Jennifer Jason Leigh, "The Revenant"

The supporting actor and actress categories are notoriously fickle and sometimes out of left field so it's possible that Alicia Vikander could end up here, though her role in "The Danish Girl" was NOT a supporting role so I am not going to even consider that.




Best Supporting Actor
 
 

Sylvester Stallone, "Creed"                     Idris Elba, "Beasts of No Nation"
Tom Hardy, "The Revenant"                      Mark Ruffalo, "Spotlight"
Mark Rylance, "Bridge of Spies"

This was my most difficult category to whittle down because there were so many good performances especially in "Spotlight."  I hate to leave Michael Keaton out because of his huge disappointment last year losing in the Best Actor category for "Birdman," but I can only choose five and I think Ruffalo out acted him in "Spotlight."

Tom Hardy was not recognized for "The Revenant"  by the Golden Globes, but he's my new favorite actor.  He's the new Daniel Day-Lewis, in my opinion, in his ability to inhabit his characters, but I think he has more of a sense of humor than Daniel. I don't know that for sure, but I think it's true.  See Hardy in "The Revenant" and then compare that to "Locke."  He is amazing.  So though the Golden Globes recognized Michael Shannon for "99 Homes (which again was really a leading role, but don't worry about him.  He has 12 movies either in production or ready for release)" and Paul Dano for "Love & Mercy," sadly, I can't.

But note that I called the Stallone win (he won a Golden Globe for "Creed" in one of the most moving moments of the night) even before the nominations were made.




Best Director

Todd Haynes, "Carol"                                  Ridley Scott, "The Martian"
Alejandro Inarritu, "The Revenant"             Tom McCarthy, "Spotlight"
George Miller, "Mad Max: Fury Road"

The question here is what about Steven Spielberg for "Bridge of Spies?"  Since I haven't seen it, I am going to leave it off my list of Best Director nominations.  As you may remember, I didn't really like "Mad Max..." but I recognize what it took to direct it, so George beats out Steven.  If Inarritu wins again this year, it will be two years in a row (he won last year for "Birdman.)"




Best Picture
 
 

So here is where I am confused.

As you may recall, as far back as most of us can remember, only five films were nominated for Best Picture.  Then in 2009 the Academy decided that they would nominate up to 10 so as to recognize all of the really great films produced during that year.  (This actually harks back to the 1930's and 40's when up to 12 films were recognized).

However, I thought that they were going back to nominating only five.  So not being sure how that stands until the nominations are made this Thursday, I am going to list ten, but I am going to list my top five first, in case only five are nominated. 

"Spotlight" 
"The Revenant"
"Brooklyn"
"Carol"
"The Big Short"

"Bridge of Spies"
"Mad Max: Fury Road"
"Room"
"The Hateful Eight"
"Straight Outta Compton"

As I said, the Golden Globes divides the Best Picture category into Comedy and Drama which the Academy does not, so movies like "Trainwreck" and "Spy," though very well done and very funny, can't really compete.  So I give the Golden Globes props for recognizing comedies, because they are not appreciated enough when it comes to getting an Oscar.  Note that I have left "Joy" off of the list.  Though I am a huge David O. Russell fan, I think "Joy" missed the mark. and I would rather see "Straight Outta Compton" get recognized.

So we shall see, right?

Though the Golden Globes did not nominate documentaries, I wanted to mention two that I think will be recognized next Thursday:  The wonderfully compelling and sad "Amy," about the rise and fall of Amy Winehouse and the funny and acerbic "Best of Enemies," about the feud between William F. Buckley Jr. and Gore Vidal, one an arch conservative, the other a staunch liberal, who were continually paired together to discuss political issues and "discuss" is not actually the right word.  Watch the film and you will see what I mean.  But the film reminded me of a time when people actually cared about and watched two really, really smart people talking about issues that mattered. 



And Animated Feature Film?  We all know which film will win that, don't we? 

See you Thursday when the 89th Academy Award Nominations are announced.

 
 

Thanks for Reading!
 
See you Friday

for my review of the new movie

"Carol"
 
and 

The Week in Reviews

 (What to See or Read and What to Avoid)
  
 and the latest on
  
My 1001 Movies I Must See Before

 I Die Project."
 
I will also comment on how well I did on the Academy Award Nominations (unless I didn't do well at which point I will pretend I never said anything)!
 
 
 
 
If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rosythereviewer