Friday, October 12, 2018

"A Star is Born" and The Week in Reviews

[I review the latest version of "A Star is Born" as well as DVDs "Deadpool 2" and "Summer 1993."  The Book of the Week is "Ninety Nine Glimpses of Princess Margaret."  I also bring you up-to-date with "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die" with "Cria Cuervos."]

A Star is Born

An established country rocker helps a young singer with her career only to find as her star ascends, his declines.

How many times have they rolled this old chestnut out?  

Mmm, let's see. FOUR TIMES. And I've seen them all.  But I have to say that it's a classic and memorable story that never gets old. 

The first one with a screenplay by Dorothy Parker and other notables and starring Janet Gaynor won a Best Picture Oscar in 1937 and wasn't even a musical.  It was about two actors. The second one turned the story into a musical and was memorable because it starred Judy Garland when her career needed a boost which it got because both she and James Mason were nominated for Best Actor Oscars and both won Best Actor Golden Globes. I have never forgotten the end of the film when Norman Maine (Mason) walked off into the ocean. Then in 1976 Barbra Streisand wanted to star in it and turned it into a story where both people were singers but what was mostly memorable about that version was her hair.  I know.  That's mean. But I can't help it.  That's what I remember most about that version. And now we have this one.  On the same wavelength (pardon the pun) as the Streisand film - two singers - but better.

Jackson "Jack" Maine (Bradley Cooper) is a country rocker who likes to drink.  He likes to drink so much that he does it all of the time and often passes out and needs to be put to bed by his brother, Bobby (Sam Elliott), Jackson's road manager and de facto mess-cleaner-upper.  Bobby is also a failed singer who resents his younger brother's success, but this is a side story that didn't really go anywhere, though it gave Sam Elliott a chance to emote a bit. 

One night after a show, Jack is looking for a bar and a drink and since any one will do, ends up in a drag bar where aspiring but yet unknown singer Ally (Lady Gaga) is performing. (She is the only female who gets to perform there because they all think she is so good).  She sings Edith Piaf's signature song "La Vie En Rose," and blows Jack away.  He goes backstage to compliment her and they stay up all night together talking about singing and songwriting. Their attraction is immediate and believable and Jack invites her to go on tour with him but she declines because she has a job as a waitress. What?  You say no to going on tour with a megastar to go back to your waitressing job where you are habitually disrespected? Am I missing something here?  It takes her awhile, but when Ally gets back to work and gets disrespected once again by the manager, she chucks the job and heads out to meet Jack. Thank you! Because on tour, Jack gets her to sing with him and she finds instant success. But then every silver lining has a cloud (I just made that up). She also finds out just how bad off Jack is as she spirals up and he spirals down.

Now I am going to rant a little bit.

Actors want to be singers, singers want to be actors.  Comedians want to be dramatic actors and dramatic actors want to be...well, not sure how many dramatic actors want to be comedians but there is a truism about doing comedy. "Dying is easy.  Comedy is hard." Maybe that's why so many dramatic actors who have tried comedy have failed. I am not going to mention any names (If you really care and want to know who I am thinking about, email me). 

So anyway, going into the theatre I was already mentally writing my review and was prepared to tell singer Lady Gaga to not quit her day job.  And not being a Bradley Cooper fan (I always thought he looked a bit dorky) I was ready to skewer him too.  Likewise, I was planning to bitch about YET ANOTHER VERSION OF THIS?  

But I am prepared to eat crow. 

Lady Gaga can act! And is sans makeup throughout.  Bradley is far from dorky in this so now I'm a fan! Might be the beard and hair and his speaking voice, which is DEEP and effective and sounds quite a bit like Kris Kristofferson who starred with Streisand in ASIB #3, but I also have to say, Bradley, you can sing! Who knew?  He also gives one of the best performances of his career.  And remember what I said about comedians wanting to be actors? What a surprise to see Andrew Dice Clay as Ally's father.  I didn't even recognize him and that's a good thing.

And as for bitching about a fourth version of this film?  

I realized while watching it that there is a reason this film gets made over and over.  It's a compelling story that we can all relate to. It spans all of our human emotions.  One person helps another with his or her career and then that person eclipses the other. There is love, jealousy, drugs, drink, sex, all of those things good and bad that make us human. And it's a tearjerker story about stepping aside to save the one you love.  For me the Judy Garland version was always the standard, but I have to say that if any comparisons are to be made, this film has that same 1950's "Big Hollywood" feeling like the Garland version (the opening title sequence got me), except maybe for the drag queens and the liberal use of the F-word. That would NOT have flown in "Old Hollywood." Homage is also given to the first two versions with Bradley's character retaining the last name of Maine.  Not sure why they changed that in the Streisand version.

Cooper and Gaga had a lot of chemistry and were very natural together, so natural, in fact, that the film had an improvisational quality and made me feel I was eavesdropping on these two meeting, falling in love and then moving apart, and that's down to Cooper who is making his directorial debut here (he also produced and co-wrote the screenplay with Eric Roth and Will Fetters).  Cooper also does a great job of recreating the touring musician's life and his use of close-ups is also effective and evocative of Old Hollywood. And the music?  It's really good too.

Even if you have seen the others, it's worth seeing again.  This is a wonderful film.

Rosy the Reviewer says...Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper as you have never seen them, giving the performances of their lives in a powerful classic film that never gets old.

***Some Movies You Might Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)!


Deadpool 2 (2018)

Smart mouthed superhero Wade Wilson (AKA Deadpool) is called upon to save a young boy who shall I say this?  A way with fire?

I guess I am not your usual demographic for this movie.  I think I told my story about that when I reviewed the first "Deadpool."  I went up to the young man at the movie theatre and said "One senior ticket for "Deadpool," please and his reply was "I sure haven't hear that before!"  Not sure why this movie wouldn't appeal to us senior citizens.  Because it's raunchy?  Because it's a tat gory?  Because Deadpool is a smart ass?  Who says senior citizens don't like raunchy and a bit of gore?  But, yes, I don't like smart asses.  But in the end, senior citizen or not, all this cinephile cares about is whether or not a film is any good and if it's supposed to be funny, is it funny?  And you know what?  The first one was good and funny, and dare I say it, because this is a sequel? This one is even better and funnier! 

This time Deadpool, our very unlikely superhero (Ryan Reynolds), is called upon to do some time traveling to take on sex traffickers and fight Cable (Josh Brolin), a mutant from the future.

Deadpool has been working as a mercenary but right when he and his girlfriend, Vanessa (Morena Baccarin), decide to start a family, one of his targets kills Vanessa.  Deadpool falls into a depression and tries to kill himself by blowing himself up. Well, he doesn't actually TRY to blow himself up.  He actually DOES blow himself up.  But Colossus (voice of Stefan Kapicic) manages to put him back together and Deadpool is brought to the X-Mansion to recover where he is convinced to join the X-Men as part of his healing process.

Meanwhile, Russell Collins (AKA as Firefist (Julian Dennison) - everyone seems to have a superhero name) is a young boy whose hands can produce fire at his whim.  He is at an orphanage that is also known as a Mutant Reeducation Center and is being abused by the headmaster at his school.  Cable has come from the future to kill Russell because a grown up Russell had killed his family.  He warns that if Russell kills the sadistic headmaster he will get a taste for killing and won't stop until he eventually kills Cable's family and Cable can't have that.  I mean, he has come all of the way from the future to prevent that. However, Deadpool has developed a soft spot for Collins and forms the X-Force to try to save him, a group of now exactly Superheroes which includes Colossus, Domino (Zazie Beetz), a woman whose super power is luck, and Negasonic Teenage Warhead (Brianna Hildebrand).  Meanwhile, Russell has joined forces with Juggernaut and heads out to kill the headmaster.

Ryan Reynolds started out as a romantic leading man and he was good at that, but he really comes into his own as the often annoying but always funny Deadpool.

Directed by David Leitch and a screenplay by Reynolds, Rhett Reese, and Paul Wernick, this film is a lot of fun. I usually don't like smartasses but here it works! You don't want to miss the opening credits which are very funny e.g. "Cinematography by Blind Al," and like the film an homage to pop culture.

Rosy the Reviewer says...dammit, I may not be the demographic for this film but I loved it!

Summer 1993 (2017)

When six-year-old Frida's (Laia Artigas) mother dies, Frida is sent to the country to live with relatives but has trouble adjusting.

And that's about it.  

Sometimes I start watching a DVD and midway through I start thinking, WTH?  Where did this one come from?  What was I thinking?

Young Frida is having trouble adjusting to a new life in the country with her relatives after her mother dies. She is sent from Barcelona to live with her Uncle Esteve (David Verdaguer) and Aunt Marga (Bruna Cusi) and their three-year-old little girl in the country.  They are very nice to her and Frida enjoys playing with the little girl. But no one talks to Frida about her loss and does nothing to help her adjust either.  The camera focuses almost entirely on Frida's face throughout the film as she watches everyone around her. Everything is from little Frida's point of view meaning that we are not privy to what is really going on.  Like children navigating around adults, much goes over their heads.  But slowly we become aware that Frida's parents died of some AIDS-related disease and there is the worry that she too may be infected.  But nothing is said and no one talks to Frida about anything much nor does anything much happen.

And that's the problem with this autobiographical film by writer/director Carla Simon.  I get what she was trying to do and it's an interesting directorial slant - to show everything from the child's view meaning not much is spelled out.  But there is a risk with that also meaning basically this film is a slow-moving slice of life, a peek into a family's world where nothing much happens.  It's beautiful to look at and the acting is fine but it was ultimately boring.

Rosy the Reviewer says...yawn.
(In Spanish with English subtitles)

***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***

123 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?

Cria Cuervos (1976)

Three orphaned sisters must adjust to life with a strict aunt and handicapped grandmother.

Two Spanish films about orphaned children in one week?  What's going on here?

Again, another one of those films about a young girl, Ana (Ana Torrent), adjusting to her new life after the death of her mother (Geraldine Chaplin).  And again, the camera is almost completely focused on the child which catches her reactions to those around her, except this time she witnesses her widowed father having a heart attack while having sex. Ana blames herself for his death, because she had wished her father dead because of his cheating on her mother.  She even went so far as to try to poison him. After his death, Ana and her two sisters are sent to live with their Aunt Paulina (Monica Randall) and grandmother (Josefina Diaz) and must figure out how to grow up and find freedom.

The film is a psychological study but also a political one.  Shot in the summer of 1975 at the end of fascist dictator Francisco Franco's reign over Spain, director Carlos Saura, who had been a Franco critic and was plagued by state censors, crafted this film that acts as a metaphor of life under Franco's fascist government. Young Ana is trying to find her way out of her restrictive life and grow into an adult, and the adult Ana shows that no matter how difficult our childhoods might be, we still grow up and have lives. Fascism can be overcome. Thank you, God. Good to know.

Geraldine Chaplin, daughter of Charlie, was a very hot commodity in the 70's. She was also director Carlos Saura's muse. Here she plays a dual role of Ana's mother and the adult Ana, but though she is compelling, this film is really all about young Ana Torrent's performance.

Why it's a Must See: "Made literally as Franco lay dying, the film follows the metaphor of life under fascism as a kind of stunted childhood...yet handles it with a refreshing sensibility and grace."
---"1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die"

The film was nominated for a Golden Globe for Best Foreign Film and won the Grand Prize at the Cannes Film Festival along with several other awards but again I found it slow and dare I say it?  Zzzzzz.

Rosy the Reviewer must be my prejudice against child actors.  I found this one boring too.

***The Book of the Week***

Ninety-Nine Glimpes of Princess Margaret by Craig Brown (2018)

Princess Margaret as you have never seen her.

And it's a hoot.

Well, if you had known her, this might not have been a surprise.

You fans of "The Crown (and I am one of them)" will probably agree with me that The Queen played by Claire Foy is wonderful but the most interesting character was definitely Princess Margaret (portrayed by Vanessa Kirby).

And this book explains it all.

But this book is actually difficult to explain.  It's part biography, part parody, part essay, part memoir and even part fantasy. For example, Pablo Picasso supposedly had a lust thing after Princess Margaret and Brown writes a little fantasy piece on what might have happened had they gotten married. Likewise, what would have happened if Margaret had not had to give up Group Captain Townsend and married him instead?  Remember, Margaret was not able to marry the man she loved because he was divorced. My how things have changed.  If she had, she supposedly would have had to give up her royal title - the HRH - and her stipend, which, in the end, she couldn't do.

Brown must also have read every celebrity diary and autobiography from the 50's to the 80's from Noel Coward to Andy Warhol to discover that practically everyone had something to say about an encounter with Princess Margaret.

"In 1970 the producer of Love Story, Robert Evans, and its star, his wife Ali McGraw, flew to London to attend the Royal Command Performance in the presence of HM Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother and HRH the Princess Margaret.  'All of us stood in the receiving line as Lord Somebody introduced us, one by one, to Her Majesty and her younger daughter.  It was a hell of a thrill, abruptly ending when the lovely princess shook my hand [and said].  'Tony [the Princess' husband] saw Love Story in New York.  Hated it.'

"When the model Twiggy and her then boyfriend...were invited to dinner...The Princess ignored Twiggy -- at that time one of the most famous women in Britain - until the very last moment.  She then turned and asked her what her name was. 'Lesley, Ma'am.  But my friends call me Twiggy.' 'How unfortunate,' replied the Princess..."

'We were playing Trivial Pursuit, and the question was the name of a curried soup.  [The Princess] said, 'It's just called curried soup.  There isn't any other name for it.  It's curried soup!'  Our host said, 'No Ma'am -- the answer is Mulligatawny.'  And she said, 'No -- it's curried soup!' And she got so furious that she tossed the whole board in the air, sending all the pieces flying everywhere.'

Rumor has it that Parliament used to say "Long live the Queen" mostly because they couldn't bear to think that Princess Margaret was the alternative!

And that's the fun of this book.  

Princess Margaret made no bones about being Princess Margaret. Princess Margaret may have been in her prime in Swinging London (the 60's) and made the most of it, hanging out with the Beatles and the campiest and swingingest that London had to offer.  But at the same time, she was still a Princess and made no bones about pulling rank if she felt she wasn't getting the attention or respect she felt she deserved.

Rosy the Reviewer says...if you are a Royal Watcher, you don't want to miss this one!

Thanks for reading!

See you next Friday 




The Week in Reviews
(What To See and What To Avoid)


the latest on

"My 1001 Movies I Must See

Before I Die Project" 

If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at

Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.

Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 

Go to, find the movie you are interested in.  Scroll down below the synopsis and the listings for the director, writer and main stars to where it says "Reviews" and click on "Critics" - If I have reviewed that film, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.

Friday, October 5, 2018

"Fahrenheit 11/9" and The Week in Reviews

[I review Michael Moore's new movie "Fahrenheit 11/9" as well as the HBO documentary "Jane Fonda in Five Acts" and the DVD "Bad Samaritan."  The Book of the Week is "Perfectly Clear: Escaping Scientology and Fighting for the Woman I Love."  I also bring you up-to-date with "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project" with "Senso."]

Fahrenheit 11/9

Michael Moore tries to figure out just how Donald Trump became President.

Most of us who were alive then know exactly where we were when we heard that President Kennedy had been shot.  I was in chemistry class and the idea that our President could be dead was so out of the realm of possibility for me that when the principle made the announcement over the classroom intercom and said our President had been shot, I thought he meant our STUDENT COUNCIL president!  Likewise, most of us Baby Boomers remember where we were and what we felt when we heard that John Lennon had been assassinated because that was another impossibility.  And most recently, liberals and Hillary supporters no doubt remember exactly where they were and what they felt when they learned that Donald Trump had become the 45th President of the United States.

And I do.

I was sitting up watching the returns alone because Hubby was away on business. I, like so many other Americans, was pretty confident that Hillary Clinton would become the first woman President of the United States.  Only two days before, the polls had said that Hillary had an 85% chance of becoming the first woman President. Trump had also been exposed as a womanizing sexual aggressor in that infamous Billy Bush tape.  It seemed like a slam dunk that Hillary would become the 45th President of the United States. I had already posted on Facebook my happiness that my newly born granddaughter would see a woman President in her lifetime.  But as the hours ticked by, euphoria turned to disbelief as it became apparent that Donald Trump was going to be the next President.  As I sat in that chair staring at the TV at 2:30 in the morning of November 9th I thought "How the f**k did that happen?"

And that is exactly the question that writer/producer/director Michael Moore poses and attempts to answer in his new documentary.

First of all, yes, he blames the Russians.  He also blames James Comey.  But most of all he blames...Gwen Stefani!

Gwen Stafani? According to Moore, it seems that Gwen Stafani was paid more for her seat on "The Voice" than Trump was paid for his "Celebrity Apprentice" TV show.  Trump was not happy about that, so he decided to do a bit of grandstanding to call attention to himself so that NBC would give him a raise.  He decided that announcing he was running for President would be the thing.  That's when we saw him grandly rolling down the escalator to make his big announcement.  But it didn't have the effect on NBC that he wanted.  In fact, NBC cancelled his show.  Moore asserts Trump didn't really intend to run for President but he had booked two rallies so he went anyway and during those rallies had a bit of an epiphany.  He liked rallies.  He liked stirring people up.  He liked being the center of attention. Maybe running for President for real wasn't such a bad idea!  And that, my friends, according to Michael Moore, is how it all started.

But just because Trump was running for President didn't mean he would win, right?

Moore was a bit of a Cassandra, Cassandra being the Trojan Princess who uttered prophecies that were true but that no one believed.  No one believed Trump could win ...except Michael Moore.  In fact, pundits unequivocally said before 11/9 that it was impossible but Michael Moore sounded the alarm. He said Trump could win. He is a Michigan boy and knew the unrest that was swirling around the common folk and they were not happy with the status quo.  No one believed Cassandra and no one believed Michael Moore either.

And Michael Moore presents the perfect storm of events that led to that happening.

There was the outrage of the Flint water crisis when Governor Rick Snyder, a businessman with no public service experience, signed an Emergency Management bill that allowed him to oust the mayors, city councils and other officials of four cities in Michigan and replace them with businessmen he appointed to run the cities.  Those cities were Pontiac, Benton Harbor, Detroit...and Flint.  Those cities were also predominantly black and it didn't matter that there was no emergency.  Water for Flint had been supplied from the clean water of Lake Huron but Snyder and his cronies decided to build another pipeline that would use the water from the filthy Flint River which ended up poisoning the locals with lead though of course no one would admit that was happening.  It was all in the name of greed and corruption. And when all of this came to light and President Obama went to Flint, but didn't do anything about it as the inhabitants had hoped, people just gave up on the establishment.  And, then, during Hillary's campaign, she didn't even bother to go to Michigan because she thought it was in the bag.

You see, Moore isn't placing all of the blame on the Republicans.  The Democrats clearly dropped the ball.  In fact, he contends there was some hanky panky on the part of the Democrats when several states gave the Democratic nomination to Hillary when Bernie had won more votes.  But there is plenty of blame to go around. Moore also blames the Electoral College - I mean in the last 16 years, two Presidents were elected who lost the popular vote. How does that happen?

And it wouldn't be a Michael Moore movie if he didn't throw in gun violence, sexual harassment, low teachers' pay and a host of other issues that he believed helped create the Trump Presidency. He also asserts that we all knew what Trump was. He was doing everything he did in plain sight.  He talked about grabbing women's private parts, he was a known womanizer, he hung out with the Russians and even said he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and not lose any voters. And no one cared. Moore even throws himself under the bus.  

And yes, he does "go there." He compares Trump's ascendancy to Hitler's and there are some potent similarities.  When Hitler came to power, Germany was the most educated, cultured and well-read country in the world.  Most towns had several newspapers.  The people were informed and involved, so how did someone like Hitler take over the country?  Little by little.  As Mussolini once said "If you pluck a chicken one feather at a time, no one notices."  And that is how fascism takes over.

So there is the usual Michael Moore controversial stuff here. But most would agree Moore is right on point when he blames the media who couldn't get enough of Trump and basically gave him free publicity and an apathetic populace who had given up on the establishment and just didn't vote. 

But this film is much more than a diatribe on the Trump Presidency.  It is also a call to arms. 

Moore shows how our freedoms are already in jeopardy and if we give up and don't vote because we think our votes don't matter, don't be surprised if all of a sudden we wake up one day and we are no longer free. Democracy isn't something that we are entitled to.  It's something we have to keep alive. We need to care about all of the issues that Moore brings up in this film and we need to speak up about them.

The film ends with those Parkland teens using their freedom of speech to agitate over gun violence and school shootings and it's clear that Moore thinks it is the young people who can save us.  I hope so.

Rosy the Reviewer says...whether you agree with Moore or not, you can always count on him to make a compelling film. This is a powerful film about the state of American politics and has much food for thought, and it made me cry.

***Some Movies You Might Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)!


Jane Fonda in Five Acts (2018)

Another controversial figure.  Eighty-year-old Jane Fonda and her life and times.

Divided into five chapters, four of which are named after the men in Jane's life, it is an effective way to tell her story because Jane herself admits she didn't know herself very well and was often defined by men.

Act One - "Henry."

Jane was the daughter of Henry Fonda, an acting icon who epitomized solid American Midwestern values.  Growing up, Jane felt she had to be a certain kind of girl, a good girl, because she was his daughter.  But Henry was also a difficult man who cheated on Jane's mother with a younger woman which led Jane's mother to kill herself.  Of course no one told Jane and her brother, Peter, that.  It was swept under the carpet and it wasn't until she went to boarding school and someone showed her a story on her mother that she learned the truth.  That's not something that is easy to get over.

Jane grew up a Daddy pleaser and was still living at home when she was 21.  Her new stepmother told her she needed to move out and that's when she met acting teacher Lee Strasberg who took her into his class and encouraged her.  She came alive.  Her career took off on Broadway and eventually in film where she specialized in ingenues. But despite her success, she still needed to get out from behind her father's shadow so she went to France.  And that's when she met Vadim.

Act Two - "Vadim"

Roger Vadim had been married to Brigitte Bardot and Catherine Deneuve (who I quote all of the time because she said "At a certain age, you have to choose between your face and your ass."  No truer words spoken) and was also a charismatic French director.  When Jane met him she allowed him to mold her which is how she ended up as Barbarella.  In France she also became politicized. She married Vadim, they had a daughter together, and Jane started engaging in more serious film projects.  Up until then she had mostly played ingenues but when she starred in "They Shoot Horses, Don't They" followed by "Klute," and she won and Oscar, everything changed. She started to be taken seriously as an actress. She also left Vadim and became an activist.

Act Three - "Tom"

She met political activist and one of the Chicago Seven, Tom Hayden, and married him.  He didn't approve of the Hollywood lifestyle so she pared down, lived in reduced circumstances, did her own shopping and cooking, didn't have a washing machine or dishwasher and helped Tom in "The Movement."  But The Movement needed money and that's how Jane came to do the Workout tapes.  She was into fitness and figured that was what she could do to contribute to the Revolution.  I would guess all of those women who bought her tapes didn't realize they were helping her leftist politics!  It was during this time that Jane started to do films with a message - "The China Syndrome (1979)," which actually foreshadowed what happened at Three Mile Island and "9 to 5 (1980)," which called attention to the sexual harassment of women office workers well before the #Metoo Movement.

Act Four - "Ted"

Tom Hayden was a controlling husband so Jane moved on to Ted Turner.  He called her the day after her divorce from Tom.  They fell in love, she gave up her career, and they had ten years together but she felt that to be with him she had to hide a part of herself. He never wanted to be alone and Jane's feminism was taking shape.

So as we move on to Act Five - what do you think that one will be called?  I remember saying to Hubby, I would imagine it will be called "Jane."  And I was right.

Act Five - "Jane"

Now at 80, Jane can look back and see that her life was defined by men.  But no more.  She always adopted the lives of the men she was with but finally realized that she didn't need a man and now at 80 her career is still going strong with the Netflix series "Grace and Frankie," reuniting with Robert Redford in "Our Souls at Night" and starring in the popular "Book Club."  She also looks great.  I want the name of her plastic surgeon.

Director Susan Lacy interviews Jane throughout the film and uses never-before-seen footage and interviews with friends and co-workers.  But it's Jane herself who makes this film so extraordinary.  She is open, candid and vulnerable. It's not all "Look at me, I'm Jane Fonda and I've had a great life!"  She has been a controversial figure and she knows it.  She has regrets.  She regrets going to North Vietnam and being used as propaganda (something many Americans still haven't forgiven her for); she regrets not being a better mother; and she regrets that she needed to have plastic surgery and "wasn't brave enough" to let herself age naturally, but in the end she says, "I am what I am," and is happy to have found herself.

Rosy the Reviewer Jane worth a two hour and twenty minute movie?  Yes, hers has been a life well-lived and she shows us that it's never too late to find ourselves.

Bad Samaritan (2018)

What do you do when you are a petty burglar and while robbing a home discover a woman being held captive there?

That's what happens to young Sean Falco (Robert Sheehan) who has figured out that being a valet in Portland is a good way to rob houses.  While people dine, he takes their car, and rather than parking it, heads to their house and robs them.  I remember saying to Hubby while watching this film that I must not have a criminal mind because it never occurred to me that a valet might do that.  Now I don't trust them!

However, when Sean arrives at arrogant and surly Cale Erendreich's (David Tennant) house he gets more than he bargained for.  He discovers a woman named Katie (Kerry Condon), chained and gagged and a very scary torture room in the garage.  What should he do?  He may be a thief but he's not a bad person, not really.  But how does he explain being in that house?  So he places an anonymous call to the police but Cale is one step ahead of him. Written by Brandon Boyce and directed by Dean Devlin, the film turns into a cat and mouse game as Sean tries to save the girl with Cale getting demonic delight by not only trying to ruin Sean's life but his family's and friends' lives as well.  Oh, yeah, Cale is also trying to kill everyone in his path too.

Doctor Who and "Broadchurch" fans will not recognize their hero, David Tennant.  He is one creepy guy in this film and he hams it up big time, but it's enjoyable (in a creepy way) seeing him have so much fun  The film plays like a Lifetime Movie, but, hey, I like Lifetime Movies and all in all it's a good little thriller with an engaging young leading man and a woman FBI agent who eventually gets the job done.

And let me just say, the moral of the story is - If you want the job done right, get a woman to do it!

Rosy the Reviewer says...far-fetched and a bit sleazy but a surprisingly good thriller.

***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***

124 to go!

Have YOU see this classic film?

Senso (1954)
("The Wanton Countess")

An Italian countess gives up everything for love. Yes, it's one of those kinds of movies.

But I love them!

Set in Venice and Verona during the Italian-Austrian War of Unification right before Giuseppe Garibaldi expelled Austrians and helped unite Venice with the rest of Italy, this is the story of a bored Italian Countess who meets and falls in love with a dashing Austrian soldier.  Sadly, the soldier is a cad. It's a romantic melodrama and this is the kind of movie I love.

The film begins during a performance of the opera "Il Trovatore," which is no surprise since director Luchino Visconti was one of Italy's most renowned directors of opera. The opera is interrupted by a demonstration by Italian Nationalists against the occupying Austrian troops who were attending the opera. And the film itself is a kind of opera as we watch Countess Livia Septieri (Alida Valli) embark on a self-destructive love affair.  She is a Garibaldi supporter who intercedes on her beloved cousin's behalf when he impulsively challenges an Austrian officer to a duel. She meets Franz Mahler, a young Austrian officer (Farley Granger), and is immediately attracted to him.  Though he is "the enemy," Livia throws caution to the wind and embarks on a love affair with Franz.  He is also a cad who uses Livia to get money to bribe a doctor to say he is unfit for battle.  When he disappears and then writes her a letter thanking her for the money, she travels to see him only to discover him drunk and with a prostitute.  He humiliates Livia by rubbing her nose in her own humiliation by making her sit at a table and dine with the prostitute. It's all very Anna Karenina except in this case "Don't mess with a woman scorned."

Valli is wonderfully dramatic as the lovelorn Livia and Granger is appropriately charming and handsome.  Visconti had originally wanted Ingrid Bergman for the part of Livia but Bergman was married to director Roberto Rossellini at the time and he didn't want her working for other directors.  And Brando?  Hard for me to imagine him mumbling around in the role of the dashing Mahler. And believe it or not, Granger was a more popular actor at the time.  Does anyone remember him now?

Why it's a Must See: "With screenplay credit for both Tennessee Williams and Paul Bowles -- among six writers in total - [this film] is a distinctly high-class melodrama."
---"1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die"

Rosy the Reviewer says...just my kind of film!  I love the old-fashioned costume melodramas that end tragically.  I'm weird that way.
(In Italian and German with English subtitles)

***The Book of the Week***

Perfectly Clear: Escaping Scientology and Fighting for the Woman I Love by Michelle LeClair (2018)

Yet another book on the evils of Scientology.

Don't get me wrong.  I am not making fun of this book, but this is certainly not the first book by someone wanting to break free from Scientology, most famously Leah Remini's book "Troublemaker" and "Ruthless," written by David Miscavige's own father, Miscavige being the head of the church. You would think with all of these books written about the evils of Scientology and what they do to you if you go against them, something significant would happen such as arrests or the Church going bankrupt.  Leah Remini has made calling Scientology out a lifelong mission and even had a regular TV show interviewing about the aftermath of a life in Scientology.  But even with that, nothing seems to happen.  Scientology just keeps chugging along. Like, why aren't we hearing from Kirstie Alley or John Travolta?

I have always been fascinated by cults and what draws people in.  I recently reviewed Catherine Oxenberg's book, "Captive," about her daughter's involvement with Nxivum and her efforts to save her.  What strikes me about that book and this one is that in both cases it was the mothers who introduced their daughters to the cults - Catherine was first interested in Nxivum and got her daughter involved.  However, when she became disenchanted with the group she left but her daughter didn't. In this book, LeClair's mother was a lifelong seeker and brought her daughter in.  Both books show how vulnerable young people are to this sort of thing especially when their own parents seem to give them the seal of approval.

If you have done any reading about Scientology at all you will already know what she reveals about the Church - the auditing with the E-Meter, the Sea Org, how the Church keeps people in line, nothing really new with that, but LeClair puts a new spin on the group as she sheds life on their intolerance toward homosexuality, which she experienced first hand.

LeClair was the former President of Scientology's international humanitarian organization and gave the group millions of her own dollars.  All of her life she had struggled with her feelings about other women and tried to live a conventional heterosexual life but an abusive marriage led her to find love elsewhere and to eventually find the love of her life - a woman.  Over the years she had tried to reconcile her sexual orientation with the anti-gay ideology of Scientology, but when she met her wife she eventually left the church not realizing what a price she would pay.  The police raided her home, her husband sued her for custody of their children and she lost her business, all, according to her, as part of the Church's plan to destroy her as they try to do with any who go against them.

Rosy the Reviewer says...a harrowing story. If you are interested in the inner workings of Scientology or in cults and how people get pulled in, this is a compelling story.

Thanks for reading!

See you next Friday 


"A Star is Born"


 The Week in Reviews
(What to See or Read and What to Avoid)

and the latest on

"My 1001 Movies I Must See Before 

I Die Project." 

If you enjoyed this post, feel free to copy and paste or click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at

Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.

Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 

Go to, find the movie you are interested in.  Scroll down below the synopsis and the listings for the director, writer and main stars to where it says "Reviews" and click on "Critics" - If I have reviewed that film, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.