Friday, May 10, 2019

"Long Shot" and The Week in Reviews

[I review "Long Shot" as well as DVDs "Mary Poppins Returns" and "Welcome to Marwen."  The Book of the Week is "Women Rowing North: Navigating Life's Currents and Flourishing as We Age" by Mary Pipher.  I also bring you up-to-date with "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project" with "No Man's Land."]



Long Shot


The unlikely romance between the beautiful U.S. Secretary of State and a schlubby journalist.

It's difficult to believe that the beautiful Charlize Theron (pronounced Thron) has never starred in a romantic comedy.  On a recent talk show she talked about this, saying that she has mostly played killers and ass-kickers.  But as I always say, the more beautiful the actor, the more he or she fears not being taken seriously so is drawn to parts where he or she looks less than beautiful and can emote dramatically.  Case in point, Charlize's Oscar came from the film "Monster," where she played the rather masculine and unattractive serial killer Aileen Wuornos.


So, Charlize finally gets to play against that usual type, this time playing Charlotte Field, the glamorous Secretary of State, who falls for Fred Flarsky (Seth Rogan), a nerdy but principled guy in this mostly fun rom-com.

Now let me rant a bit about this concept.  

Why is it perfectly OK for a gorgeous woman to fall for a geeky nerd who would not be called handsome no matter how you shave his neck, comb his hair and put him in a tux?  We think nothing of that.  But what if the movie was in reverse?  What if Chris Hemsworth fell in love with Olive Oyl, then what? I mean, no offense to Seth Rogan, but I am sure even he would say he is no George Clooney and the movie IS called "Long Shot," which, in part, refers to the likelihood of such a hook-up as Fred and Charlotte. I'm just saying, we can accept a beautiful woman falling for a less than handsome man, but get all sweaty when it's a handsome man falling for a homely woman.  OK, rant over.

Charlotte Field is the U.S. Secretary of State with ambitions to run for President. (As things have gone so far in this country, I would say another long shot reference)?  When the flunky, inept President (Bob Odenkirk), an ex-TV star (ring a bell?) tells her he is not seeking a second term so he can become a movie star, she seeks his endorsement.  Meanwhile, Fred has left his job as a journalist for an alt paper when he discovers the newspaper has been bought by a Murdoch-like mogul owner (Andy Serkis) of a newspaper congomerate. Fred's morals just won't let him work for such a man.  Fred and Charlotte meet at a fundraiser and the two realize that Charlotte was once Fred's babysitter.  He had a mad crush on her then and remembers her as a high principled teen. When Charlotte discovers that Fred is a writer, she hires him to help her with her speeches as she stumps for President and, well, you know how this is going to go...

And most of it is a fun journey.

I say most of it, because, well, I think comedies and I don't get along.  Or I am just a big grouch.  I haven't liked one for quite awhile, even ones that everyone else seemed to think were funny like "A Bad Moms Christmas" and  "Isn't it Romantic?"  Don't get me wrong, this one isn't really bad. Rogan is always fun to watch as he puts his foot in his mouth and now we know Charlize can do comedy. I mean, what can't she do? And I loved O'Shea Jackson Jr. as Lance, Fred's best friend, and the love-hate relationship between Charlotte's image-maker, Maggie (June Diane Raphael) and Fred is funny, though Raphael plays exactly the same character here that she plays on "Grace and Frankie." But I just didn't laugh much.  And isn't the "com" part of rom-com supposed to mean comedy?  And aren't comedies supposed to be funny?

Whether I laugh or not is one thing, but sometimes comedies also make me mad.  What makes me mad are comedies rooted in reality that jar you and stretch that realm of reality just to get a laugh, and this one has some of those. For example:

  • Fred jumps out of a window two stories up to escape a white supremanist group he has infiltrated and lands on a car  -- walking away unscathed.  Huh?
  • Charlotte is supposed to be a very moral, liberal public servant.  How did she get appointed Secretary of State by a President who is clearly a Donald Trump character?  I'm just asking.
  • And what's with the use of the "F" bomb?  OK, I guess it's kind of funny to have the Secretary of State say it - THE FIRST TIME.  But when it is thrown out there all of the time, it loses its shock value. I am certainly not a prude when it comes to swearing, but in this film it turned into a distraction.  And I am not even going to get into the raunchy stuff.  If it's a Seth Rogan movie, you know there is going to be raunch.

Grousing about the state of the current comedy genre aside, there is an enjoyable sweetness to the relationship between Charlotte and Fred, thanks to Charlize and Seth. 

Written by Dan Sterling and Liz Hannah and directed by Jonathan Levine, all in all, this film is in the right place. It has some things to say about our current political climate, the love story has charm, there are some laughs to be had, and the characters are mostly believable, except an aging TV star becoming the U.S. President?  Who would believe that?

Rosy the Reviewer says...a mostly charming little love story that works because of Rogan and Theron.



***Some Movies You Might Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did)!


On DVD





Mary Poppins Returns (2018)


The Banks children have grown up, but their lives haven't turned out as they had hoped, so it's time for Mary Poppins to return and spread some of her magic around once again.

Michael Banks (Ben Wishaw) has fallen on hard times.  Michael's wife has passed away leaving him to care for their children and his home is being repossesed.  He is hopeless with money because his wife always handled the practical side of the marriage.  He needs to pay the mortgage in full in five days or he loses his house. Jane (Emily Mortimer) is single and a labor organizer and is trying to help Michael.  They remember that their Dad was a banker and owned stock in the bank but naturally they can't find the paper that shows he did.  If he did, that would save the day, but they don't know where the stock certificates are.

Did I just say save the day?  It's time for Mary Poppins (Emily Blunt) to return!

Or is it?  I kind of wish Mary had stayed where she was - in the glow of Julie Andrews'  iconic performance.  And you can't help but compare this film to the original.

Emily Blunt is perfectly fine as Mary except when you compare her to Julie Andrews.  It just ain't the same.  Julie had a constant twinkle in her eye that made everything she did and said magical. Julie was fully invested as Mary Poppins.  She was Mary Poppins whereas I could feel Emily acting as Mary Poppins.

Also the music is forgettable.  When we walked out of the original Mary Poppins we were singing, "A spoonful of sugar makes the medicine go down, the medicine go downnn, the medicine go downnn..." and "Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious."  Now, I can't remember one song that was in this remake.  And believe it or not, there is actually a sing-along version of this film!

Directed by Rob Marshall who also directed "Chicago," there is nothing particularly wrong with this movie. It just lacked magic. And it was a sequel/remake, and you know how I feel about those!  Disney is in the midst of remaking all of its classic films and I am not particularly happy about that but the almight dollar calls, I guess.


But I feel bad about not really loving this film. I don't want to complain about musicals because in general musicals have gone the way of the dinosaur and I love musicals.  When I was growing up, musicals were a common occurrence.  Now they are rare.  And it's ironic, because in this time of such divisiveness, we need to see people spontaneously dancing in the street and singing love songs more than ever!

The film sports a star-studded cast.  In addition to Blunt, Winshaw and Mortimer, Lin-Manuel Miranda is a nice addition as Jack, the lamplighter and he actually sports a competent cockney accent. Colin Firth and Meryl Streep also make appearances, and it was fun seeing Dick Van Dyke.  But I wondered why Angela Lansbury had a cameo?  She wasn't in the original, was she?

However, despite my reservations, this sequel/remake (not sure what you would call it) written by David Magee, John DeLuca and Marshall, is a good one for today. It's a reminder that no matter how old we get we will always be that little child who could use a Mary Poppins who shows us that nothing is impossible.


Rosy the Reviewer says...I respect this film as a musical, but as a sequel/remake, I would prefer to just remember the original.




Welcome to Marwen (2018)


The strange tale of Mark Hogancamp (played by Steve Carell), who was beaten within an inch of his life and helped heal himself through his art.

Directed by Robert Zemekis, who has brought us some really wonderful movies, this one is a very strange film, indeed. It's based on the true story of Mark Hogencamp who was beaten up outside a bar for telling some guys he liked to wear women's shoes (something that is not explained or fleshed out at all in the film) and the beating resulted in him losing his memory.  So as a sort of rehabilitation, Hogancamp created a fictional doll-sized WW II Belgian town - Marwen - in his back yard with a set of dolls, a GI Joe doll, his alter ego, Hogie, an American pilot who was shot down by the Nazis and who runs a bar there called The Ripped Stocking, and the "Women of Marwen," several Barbie dolls, who all do battle with the Nazis. Hogancamp would pose the dolls and photograph them which became part of his therapy. An award-winning documentary - "Marwencol" - was made about Hogancamp and his art.

Co-written by Zemekis and Caroline Thompson, this biopic takes license with the story, animating the dolls and going back and forth between Hogancamp's actual life and the fictional world he has created with the dolls, but instead of generic Barbie dolls, Zemekis has fashioned the dolls after characters in the film who were heroine's for Hogancamp: Hogancamp's neighbor Nicol, played by Leslie Mann; Anna (Gwendoline Christie), a nurse who helped Hogancamp recover; G.I. Julie (Janelle Monae), his physical therapist; Roberta (Merritt Weaver), who works in the hobby shop where Mark gets his supplies; Carlala (Eiza Gonzales), the bartender at the bar where he was attacked; and Suzette (Leslie Zemekis), Mark's favorite porn actress.  There is also a witch named Deja (Diane Kruger), who keeps showing up. It's a kind of film within a film as the dolls weave in and out of Hogancamp's real life to re-enact life in the WW II town. 


The film is a worthy cause, I guess, telling Hogancamp's story and trying to show the healing power of art - but it just didn't work. It was overly sentimental except when the film went down some sexually kinky roads.  The whole thing just didn't make much sense. The story that the dolls tell is forgettable and, when woven into Hogancamp's story, the film was just a big jumble. Zemekis might have been hoping to produce another "Forrest Gump," but no such luck. This is just another example of a film that didn't need to be remade.  Why not just leave "Marwencol" alone?  And Steve Carell was a strange choice for Hogancamp. He made Hogancamp seem very creepy. I wouldn't think the real life Hogancamp would appreciate the characterization.


The film has a good message, "Women are the saviors of the world," (I like that), but as gun-toting dolls?


Rosy the Reviewer...creepy and sappy. Not a good mix.




***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***


96 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?



No Man's Land (2001)


During the Bosnian conflict, three soldiers find themselves stuck in "no man's land," that space between where the lines are drawn.

It's 1993 and a Bosnian relief squad is headed to the front but are ambushed by Serbs. Only two survive, Ciki (Branko Djuric, a dead ringer for Jon Hamm) and Cera (Filip Sovagovic), though Ciki is shot and Cera knocked unconscious.  A Serbian veteran and his partner, Nino (Rene Bitorajac), arrive to survey the damage.  Thinking that Cera is dead, they set a bomb underneath Cera hoping that when his compatriots try to move him, it will blow everyone to smithereens. It's a "bouncing bomb." Once set and weight is placed on it, nothing happens.  But as soon as the weight is released, kaboom! As soon as Cera moves off the bomb, it will explode. But Cera is not dead. Ciki shoots the veteran but Nino is left with them and the three must work together to survive.

U.N. forces arrive as does a British news crew.  When it becomes clear that the bomb cannot be disarmed, the three become victims of the politics and corruption of nationalism and war.

"No man's land" is a term used to describe the disputed ground between the front lines of two opposing armies.  This film shows that it is also a place where no man (or woman) should be - war itself.

Why it's a Must See: "[Written and directed by Danis Tanovic, this film] is a bleak affair, indeed, but a meaningful cinematic experience can be found in its dark, dark comedy of errors wherein forthright patriots festoon one another on the symbolic bayonets of their rifles."

Rosy the Reviewer says...a very tense and sad film that reminds us of the horrors of war.





***The Book of the Week***



Women Rowing North: Navigating Life's Currents and Flourishing as We Age by Mary Pipher (2019)


Despite ageism, misogyny and loss, we older women could be the happiest we have ever been. Find out how.

Pipher, who wrote "Reviving Ophelia," the definitive tome on raising teenage girls, now examines the cultural and developmental issues women face as they age.  And it's mostly good news.

But first, the bad news:

  • Loss of control
  • Loss of identity
  • Loss of loved ones
  • Health issues
  • Misogyny
  • Sexually devalued as in becoming invisible
  • Mother-in-law jokes and other old lady stereotyping

(Sigh)


Now for the good news:

  • We have choices
  • We replace old roles with new roles
  • We are happier than we were in our 20's, 30's and early 40's with the peak of happiness at the end of  our lives
  • Lower levels of anxiety, depression and stress
  • We can be advocates for change and create our own communities
  • We care less about our wrinkles and stretch marks
  • We have appreciation for family and friends
  • Some of us enjoy our grandchildren
  • We gain gratitude for life
  • We learn that the most important relationship we have is the one we have with ourselves
  • We can discover our true selves and are able to tell the truth...
  • Like telling people to shut-up with the old people and mother-in-law jokes already

See?  The list of good news about growing old is longer than the list of bad news!

Pipher shares her own journey and the stories of other women who are "rowing."  She chose the word 'rowing' instead of sailing or floating because, she says, we need to "make an effort, choose a positive attitude, and maintain a strong sense of direction as we travel toward winter and the land of snow and ice."

Though I think this is an important book, I do disagree with her on one point:

She talks about her "locker room," where we women of a certain age walk around naked, unselfconscious about our flabby thighs and wrinkled butts while those poor young women with the perfect bodies huddle in the corner changing their clothes because they are so self conscious about having perfect bodies.  

Well, you ain't gonna see this lady walking around in the locker room showing off her sagging boobs.  I am proud to have made it this far, and I think I am aging well, but I also do what I can to look good and refuse to give in to the inevitable until I have to.  I wear make-up, keep those grey hairs at bay (blondes DO have more fun!) and exercise and lift weights to keep the flab away as long as I can.  I may be old, but I don't want to look like I don't care how I look, and even if I am invisible to the younger generation, I am not invisible to myself. I am a longtime feminist and proud of it.  I understand the unreasonable expectations placed on women to look a  certain way, but I also feel that taking care of oneself, throwing on a bit of makeup if that enhances you, and dressing well shows the world you care about yourself.  My getting old hasn't changed that. (You can read more of my rant about this in one of my earlier blog posts - "How Not To Look Old.)"

What Pipher says "...If we can keep our wits about us, think clearly, and manage our emotions skillfully, we will experience a joyous time in our lives.  If we have planned carefully and packed properly, if we have good maps and guides, the journey can be transcendent."

Rosy the Reviewer says...just as "Reviving Ophelia" was the definitive book on teenage girls, this will surely be the definitive book about us Baby Boomer women. And no more old people and mother-in-law jokes!




Thanks for reading!




See you next Friday





for 



"Poms"





and

The Week in Reviews

(What To See and What To Avoid)



as well as


the latest on


"My 1001 Movies I Must See

Before I Die Project" 





If you enjoyed this post, feel free to click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rosythereviewer

Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.

Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 


Go to IMDB.com, find the movie you are interested in.  Scroll down below the synopsis and the listings for the director, writer and main stars to where it says "Reviews" and click on "Critics" - If I have reviewed that film, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.


Friday, May 3, 2019

"Little" and The Week in Reviews

[I review "Little" as well as the documentaries "Killing for Love" and "That Summer."  The Book of the Week is my new favorite cookbook "One -Pan Wonders."  I also bring you up-to-date with "My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project" with "The Battle of San Pietro."]




Little


A beautiful but hard-nosed CEO gets her comeuppance when she is unwillingly transformed into her geeky younger self.

Jordan Sanders (Regina Hall) was bullied in middle school when she was "little," so she vowed that when she was "big" she would get even.  And she does.  The "big" Jordan runs a successful gaming company and also runs her employees ragged.  When she comes to work, everyone heads for the hills.  No carbs allowed, no breaks, she insults her executive team for bad ideas, and she treats her assistant, April (Issa Rae), like crap.


One day while bullying a little girl who is practicing magic tricks with her magic wand outside the company where her Dad runs a food truck  - yes, Jordan also bullies little girls - the little girl asks Jordan why she is so mean and then puts a curse on her wishing Jordan was little. Wouldn't you know, the next day, when Jordan wakes up she has been transformed into her 13-year-old self (Marsai Martin) complete with geeky glasses and a mop of frizzy hair.  Once she proves to April that she is indeed Jordan but in a 13-year-old's body, April is assigned the duty of taking care of the company while the adult Jordan must go back and relive middle school (the local neighbor turned her into CPS which results in a very funny scene with Rachel Dratch as the CPS rep).


Hilarity ensues.  Well, kind of...


Remember "Big" starring Tom Hanks?  Well, this is the opposite of that.  He was a little boy in an adult body.  Now we have an adult in a little girl's body.  Written by Tina Gordon and Tracy Oliver and directed by Gordon, this is a cute concept that didn't quite make it to "Big" status.


Speaking of concepts, this was Marsai Martin's concept (she also plays the young Jordan), and she is one of the producers, making her the youngest producer ever in Hollywood.  And she is a commendable actress as well.  Likewise, you can always count on Regina Hall.  But Issa Rae saves the day here.  Most of the laughs come from her performance, with her under-her-breath asides and comic reactions. She makes it all work.

There are also some laughs to be had as the adult Jordan in the middle-schooler body must attend school and once again endure bullying. But she also befriends some "other kids" who are also unpopular and tries to help them make it through and in so doing learns about herself.  And there is also a female empowerment message as April is finally able to find her voice. But sadly there are also some cringeworthy scenes such as when thirteen-year-old Jordan gives her hunky adult teacher (Justin Hartley) some sexy come-on looks and when she sings drunkenly on a bar top, all very inappropriate behavior for a thirteen-year-old and worse, not very funny.


But, hey, it's a comedy that is better than most that have come down the pike of late. "Come down the pike?"  Did I just say that?

And there is a message: Don't be mean to little kids or you might just wake up as one!

Rosy the Reviewer says...though the film hits and misses, if you need an escape, there are some laughs to be had here.




***Some Movies You Might Have Missed***
(And Some You Will Be Glad You Did!)


On DVD




Killing for Love (2016)


A true crime documentary covering the 1985 murders of Derrick and Nancy Haysom who were supposedly killed by their daughter's boyfriend.  He was convicted but did he do it?

One of my guilty pleasures (I have many) is true crime.  I am guilty of being fascinated by the guilty.  I am obsessed with "Dateline," even though I know when it's a murder case involving a dead woman, it's always the husband who did it (don't these guys know about divorce)?

But in this case, it's patricide and matricide.

Elizabeth Haysom and Jens Soring were students at the University of Virginia in 1985.  Jens was a student from Germany who had never been away from home nor had he much in the way of sexual experience.  So he was swept off his feet by the beautiful upper class and worldly Elizabeth who supposedly groomed him to kill her parents.  She regaled him with stories of her mother having a sexual relationship with her and all kinds of other abuse.  Jens was so besotted he would do anything for her.  

When the two were finally arrested, Jens confessed to the murders but later recanted, saying Elizabeth had done it and he had given a false confession to protect her, feeling that he would also be protected because his father was a German diplomat.  He said she did it and she said he did it.  But since the movie began with a version of "I Put a Spell On You," it's clear that the film is sympathetic to Jens and the implication here is that she did it and tried to get him to take the blame.  She confesses to being a drug addict, abused by her mother and even an accessory after the fact, but according to her, Jens killed her parents.  

Written and directed by Marcus Vetter and Karin Steinberger, this is a well-made film, edited to dramatic effect.  The crime scenes are gruesome and Jens' interview 27 years later is compelling. This is a German film and comes from the place that Jens should at least be allowed to return to Germany for his sentence. He seems believable in his assertion it was she who killed her parents possibly with an accomplice, and he took the rap because he believed he would be sent back to Germany where his sentence would be lighter and then he and Elizabeth would be reunited.  Unfortunately that didn't happen.

We see actual court testimony by Elizabeth, but Elizabeth refused to be interviewed for this film, which is not surprising. But Jens' interview (in his native German) is fascinating, and when all is said and done, the film is persuasive in showing reasonable doubt, especially in light of recent DNA findings showing that two other men could have been at the crime scene.  No DNA was tied to Jens.  

This case has become a cause celebre as many have sided with Jens and lobbied for his release.  In fact, in 2010, while governer of Virginia, Tim Kaine approved Jens being sent back to Germany, but that was later rescinded by his Republican successor, Bob McDonnell.  Jens has been denied parole 14 times. 

Rosy the Reviewer says...if you like true crime, this is a good one and there is a moral to the story: be careful who you fall in love with.



That Summer (2017)



A prequel to the famous documentary "Grey Gardens."

This is a strange little film that begins with Peter Beard showing off his photographs.  Beard is a photographer famously associated with the Kennedys. Beard and Lee Radziwill (Jackie Kennedy Onassis's sister) had collaborated with the Maysles brothers (now famous documentarians) to make a film about Jackie's and Lee's childhood memories of visiting East Hampton as children and also include all of the changes that had occurred there due to rapid development.  They were going to touch on the lives of her relatives, the Beales, Big Edie and Little Edie, Lee's and Jackie's aunt and cousin who lived there, because Lee remembers visiting them. "I was really happy that summer." 

But when Beard and Radziwill discovered the squalor and eccentric life that the Beales were living in their big dilapidated estate in East Hampton that summer while working on the film, the Edies became the story instead. With the help from money given by Aristotle Onassis, Lee helped the Beales fix the plumbing, had electrical work done and the garbage and mold removed, so that they would avoid being evicted by the local authorities.  However, for some reason, the actual making of the film fell through and the footage that was taken that summer was lost for 45 years. Until now.

The Radziwill-Beard project fell through, but their idea turned out to be a windfall for the Maysles brothers who went back on their own and eventually made the wonderful "Grey Gardens (1975)," which featured Big Edie and Little Edie and which ultimately turned them into cult figures with a song and a Broadway musical written about them.  

This little film stands as a sort of prequel to "Grey Gardens" as it contains the lost footage that was shot when Lee and Peter Beard were working on their film. And Beale fans won't be disappointed.  There is lots of Big and Little Edie here.  Big Edie grouses and bickers with Little Edie, and Little Edie compares one of their cats to Ted Kennedy, sings a rendition of "My Adobe Hacienda," and sits in her "Disappointment Chair."


Directed by Goren Olsson, there is also some insight into Lee, the Bouvier sister who always lived in Jackie's shadow and about whom much less is known.  She comes across as a very charming and elegant woman as she spends time with both Edies.  She is accepting of them and kind, so the film doesn't feel exploitive of the Beales, as some critics claimed "Grey Gardens" was.  The Beales are caught even more off guard in this than in "Grey Gardens," possibly because they were related to Lee and felt comfortable around her. 

Rosy the Reviewer says...the Beales are interesting characters indeed, but the Radziwill connection is also interesting, and this is a nice accompaniment to "Grey Gardens.



***My 1001 Movies I Must See Before I Die Project***


97 to go!

Have YOU seen this classic film?



San Pietro (1945)
(AKA "The Battle of San Pietro")


A documentary short directed by John Huston early in his career that documented the taking of an Italian hill town from the Nazis by American soldiers in WW II.

The Americans won but at a terrible cost - 1000 American soldiers were lost.

Huston had already made "The Maltese Falcon" before he served in the U.S. Army during WW II making films for The Army Signal Corps. He was a captain when he made this film (he eventually rose to the rank of major), which was one of three propaganda films commissioned he made to gain support for the war. He narrated the film, and his purpose was to portray the experience of war seen from the viewpoint of those fighting it.  Ironically, though, the film wasn't released until after the final victory in Europe because the film also showed some failure in U.S. intelligence that led to many American deaths.

Why it's a Must See: "Made for the U.S. Army as a propaganda film, John Huston's The Battle of San Pietro remains the best war documentary ever made..."
---"1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die"

Best war documentary ever made?  

Not sure, but it's 30 minutes of actual war footage from WW II with a dramatic narration.  And in general the film is unapologetically overdramatic and pro-U.S.A.  I mean, the Mormon Tabernacle Choir sings over his final words at the end as he talks about how much the Italians saw us as saviors.  So, you decide.  

World War II has always been depicted as a noble war for the U.S. But as someone born after W.W. II, I realized while watching this film that even at my age that I have never lived through a war that was a noble war. I like to think that the U.S. was a helper, a savior during W.W. II, because that's how our participation in WW II has always been sold to us. We know all about "The Greatest Generation."  But we have learned that we waited until it was in our best interest to get involved. And since then, all of the wars we have been involved in have seemed to be self-serving and/or unnecessary.  General Sherman said, "War is hell."  He was right.  But for many more reasons than he probaby thought at the time. War is not only hell but very, very wrong. 


Rosy the Reviewer says...compelling...and sobering.




***The Book of the Week***




One-Pan Wonders: Fuss-Free Meals for Your Sheet Pan, Dutch Oven, Skillet, Roasting Pan, Casserole and Slow Cooker by Cook's Country (2016)



Who doesn't love a cookbook that only uses one pan or pot?

I know I do.  

It has everything I love in a cookbook:


  • Colorful full page illustrations
  • Fun to read introductions for each recipe
  • Easy-to-use index
  • Delicious recipes that are easy to prepare -- in just one pot or pan!


From "Baked Shrimp and Orzo with Feta and Tomatoes (all in one skillet) to "Pork Tenderloin with Green Beans and Potatoes (one sheet pan)" to "Baked Ziti with Spinach and Sausage (one Dutch oven)" to "Hands Off Spaghetti and Meatballs (one casserole dish)" to "Peruvian Roast Chicken with Swiss Chard and Sweet Potatoes (one roasting pan)" to "Spanish Chicken and Saffron Stew (slow cooker).  One pot or pan means easy prep and easy clean up.

And you vegetarians and pescatarians haven't been left out either - there's "Chickpea Tagine," "Baked Mac and Cheese" and "Lemon-Herb Cod Fillets with Crispy Garlic Potatoes," to name just a few.  Yum!

Rosy the Reviewer says...my new favorite cookbook!




Thanks for reading!



See you next Friday



for 


"Long Shot"


and

The Week in Reviews
(What To See and What To Avoid)


as well as


the latest on


"My 1001 Movies I Must See


Before I Die Project" 




If you enjoyed this post, feel free to click on the share buttons to share it on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and LinkedIn, email it to your friends and LIKE me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/rosythereviewer


Check your local library for DVDs and books mentioned.

Next time you are wondering whether or not to watch a particular film, check out my reviews on IMDB (The International Movie Database). 


Go to IMDB.com, find the movie you are interested in.  Scroll down below the synopsis and the listings for the director, writer and main stars to where it says "Reviews" and click on "Critics" - If I have reviewed that film, you will find Rosy the Reviewer alphabetically on the list.